Luminal cross-sectional area and tension-strain relation of the porcine bile duct

Neurogastroenterology and Motility

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 203-209

  Duch, B U ^a,b   Petersen, J A K ^a   Gregersen, H ^a,b  

^a Institute of Experimental Clinical Research   (Denmark)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Biomechanical wall properties; Impedance planimetry; Isolated bile duct; Strain; Tension

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT; COMMON BILE DUCT; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEPATIC DUCT; NONHUMAN; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; SWINE;

ANIMALS; BALLOON DILATATION; BIOMECHANICS; COMMON BILE DUCT; HEPATIC DUCT, COMMON; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE, SMOOTH; PRESSURE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SWINE;

EID: 0031832879     PISSN: 13501925     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2982.1998.00099.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Elbrønd H, Tøttrup A, Forman A. Mechanical properties of isolated smooth muscle from rabbit sphincter of Oddi and duodenum. Scand J Gatstroenterol 1991; 26:287-94.
2. Strah KM, Pappas TN, Melendez RL, Debas HT. Contrasting cholinergic dependence of pancreatic and gallbladder responses to cholecystokinin. Am J Physiol 1986; 250:665-9.
3. Grace PA, Poston GJ, Williamson RCN. Biliary motility. Gut 1990; 31:571-82.
4. Ogawa Y, Tanaka M. Biliary pressure variation in coordination with migrating motor complex of duodenum in patients with cholecystectomy and effects of morphine and cerulein. Dig Dis Sci 1992; 37:1531-6.
5. Mochinaga N, Sarna SK, Condon RE, Dodds WJ, Matsumoto T. Gastroduodenal regulation of common duct bile flow in the dog. Gastroenterology 1988; 94:755-61.
6. Severi C, Grider JR, Makhlouf GM. Functional gradients in muscle cells isolated from gallbladder, cystic duct, and common bile duct. Am J Physiol 1988; 225:G647-52.
7. Fung YC. Biomechanics. Motion, Flow, Stress, and Growth. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990.
8. Gregersen H, Kassab G. Biomechanics of the gastrointestinal tract. Neurogastroenterol Mot 1996; 8:277-97.
9. Gregersen H, Andersen MB. Impedance measurement system for quantification of cross-sectional area in the gastrointestinal tract. Med Biol Eng Comput 1991; 29:108-10.
10. Gregersen H, Jorgensen CS, Dall FH. Biomechanical wall properties in the isolated perfused porcine duodenum: an experimental study using impedance planimetry. J Gastrointestinal Motility 1992; 4:125-35.
11. Gregersen H, Orvar K, Christensen J. Biomechanical properties of duodenal wall and duodenal tone during phase I and Phase II of the MMC. Am J Physiol 1992; 263:G795-801.
12. Gregersen H, Kraglund K, Djurhuus JC. Variations in duodenal cross-sectional area during the interdigestive motility complex. Am J Physiol 1990; 259:G26-31.
13. Gregersen H, Stødkilde-Jørgensen H, Djurhuus JC, Mortensen SO. A method for investigation of compliance in luminal organs. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1988; 9 (Suppl. A): 61-4.
14. Gregersen H, Djurhuus JC. Impedance planimetry: A new approach to biomechanical intestinal wall properties. Dig Dis Sci 1991; 9:332-40.
15. Storkholm JH, Villadsen GE, Jensen SL, Gregersen H. Passive elastic wall properties in the isolated guinea-pig small intestine. Dig Dis Sci 1995; 40:976-82.
16. Gregersen H, Jensen LS, Djurhuus JC. Changes in esophageal wall biomechanics after portal vein banding and variceal sclerotherapy measured by a new technique. An experimental study in rabbits. Gut 1988; 29:1699-704.
17. Harris JH, Therkelsen EE, Zinner NR. Electrical measurement of ureteral flow. In: Boyarsky S, Tanagho EA, Gottschalk CW, Zimskind PD, eds. Urodynamics. London: Academic Press, 1971: 465-72.
18. Duch BU, Petersen JAK, Vinter-Jensen L, Gregersen H. Elastic properties in the circumferential direction in isolated rat small intestine. Acta Physiol Scand 1996; 157:157-63.
19. Steiner D, Henning R, Lierse W. Bioconstruction of the extrahepatic biliary duct system in minipigs. Acta Anat 1989; 136:159-64.
20. Schulte SJ, Baron RL, Teefey SA, et al. CT of the extrahepatic bile ducts: wall thickness and contrast enhancement in normal and abnormal ducts. Am J Roentgenol 1990; 154:79-85.
21. Ogawa Y, Tanaka M. Biliary pressure variation in coordination with migration motor complex of duodenum in patients with cholecystectomy and effects of morphine and cerulein. Dig Dis Sci 1992; 37:1531-6.
22. Hauge CW, Mark JB. Common bile duct motility and sphincter mechanism. Ann Surg 1965; 162:1028-38.
23. Torsoli A, Corazziari E, Habib FI, Cicala M. Pressure relationships within the human bile tract. Scand J Gastroenterol 1990; 25 (Suppl. 175):52-7.
24. Csendes A, Sepúlveda A, Burdiles P, et al. Common bile duct pressure in patients with common bile duct stones with or without acute suppurative cholangitis. Arch Surg 1988; 123:697-9.
25. Storkholm JH, Jørgensen CS, Dall FH, Jensen SL, Gregersen H. Differences exist in passive elastic wall properties between segments of isolated guinea-pig distal ileum and duodenum in vitro. Neurogastroenterol Mot. 1994; 6:21-7.
26. Gregersen H, Giversen IM, Rasmussen LM, Tottrup A. Biomechanical wall properties and collagen content in the partially obstructed opossum esophagus. Gastroenterology 1992; 103:1547-51.
27. Lose G, Colstrup G, Saksager K, Kristensen JK. New probe for measurement of related values of cross-sectional area and pressure in a biological tube. Med Biol Eng Comput 1986; 24:488-92.
28. Gregersen H, Jørgensen CS, Dall FH, Jensen SL. Characteristics of spontaneous and evoked motility in the isolated perfused duodenum. J Appl Physiol 1992; 73:9-19.
29. Mortensen SO, Djurhuus JC, Rask-Andersen H. A system for measurements of micturition urethral cross-sectional areas and pressures. Med Biol Eng Comput 1983; 21: 482-8.
30. Dobrin PB. Mechanical properties of arteries. Physiol Rev 1978; 58:397-460.
31. Gregersen H, Knudsen L, Eika B, Salling Nerstrøm L, Rasmussen L, Jensen LS. A time-dependent study of passive esophageal wall properties and collagen content in rabbits with esophageal varices. Dig Dis Sci 1991; 36:1050-6.