Economic assessment in radiology;Evaluation economique en radiologie

Journal de Radiologie

Volumn 79, Issue 7, 1998, Pages 645-650

  Durand Zaleski, I ^a   Dallo Palma, L ^b   Dixon, A K ^c   Reiser, M ^d   Soimakallio, S ^e   Choix, C ^a  

^a HENRI MONDOR HOSPITAL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^d LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^e Hôpital Universitaire de Kuopio   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; PERFORMANCE; RADIOLOGY; REVIEW; ARTICLE; COST; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EVALUATION; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; STANDARD;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; EVALUATION STUDIES; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; RADIOLOGY;

EID: 0031827169     PISSN: 02210363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Fineberg HV, Bauman R, Sosman M. Computerized cranial tomography : effect on diagnostic and therapeutic plans. JAMA 1977;238:224-7.
2. Kent DL, Larson EB. Disease, levels of impact and quality of research methods. Three dimensions of clinical efficacy assessment applied to magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 1992;27:245-54.
3. Mackenzie R, Dixon AK. Measuring the effects of imaging : an evaluation framework. Clin Radiol 1995;50:513-8.
4. Dixon AK, Southern JP, Teale A et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of head and spine : effective for the clinician or the patient ? Br Med J 1991;302:78-82.
5. Mackenzie R, Dixon AK, Keenes GS, Hollingworth W, Lomas DJ, Villar RN. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee : assessment of effectiveness. Clin Radiol 1996;51:245-50.
6. Gorry GA, Pauker SG, Schawarz WB. The diagnostic importance of the normal finding. N Engl J Med 1978;298:486-9.
7. Hillman BJ. Outcomes research and cost-effectiveness analysis for diagnostic imaging. Radiology 1994;193:307-10.
8. England W, Roberts S, Grim C. Surgery or angioplasty for cost effective renal revascularization ? Med Decis Making 1987;7:84-91.
9. Smith WL, Erkonen WE, Hough DE. Calculating the costs of an undergraduate medical education in radiology. Invest Radiol 1994;29:856-8.
10. Barrett B, Parfney P, Foley R, Detsky A. An economic analysis of strategies for the use of contrast media for diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Med Decis Making 1994;14:325-35.
11. Posnett J, Jan S. Indirect cost in economic evaluation: the opportunity cost of unpaid inputs. Health Economics 1996;5:13-23.
12. Jordan JF, Marks MP, Lane B, Steinberg GK. Cost-effectiveness of endovascular therapy in the surgical management of cerebral arteriovenous malformation. AJNR 1996;17:247-4.
13. Leung DP, Dixon AK. Clinico-radiological meetings : are they worthwhile ? Clin Radiol 1992;46:279-80.
14. McEwan DW, Dyck DR, Greenberg ID et al. Diagnostic imaging management in Manitoba. RadioGraphics 1994;14:1109-18.
15. Vanninen R, Manninen H, Soimakallio S. Imaging of carotid artery stenosis : clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness. AJNR 1995;16:1875-83.
16. Behrenbeck T, Gerber TC, Rumberger J. Electron beam CT and cost-efficient diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Radiology 1996;36:327-36.
17. Feig SA. Mammographic screening of women aged 40-49 years. Benefit, risk and cost considerations. Cancer (Suppl) 1995;76:2097-106.