|
Volumn 46, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 452-458
|
Is quantitative antibiogram a reliable epidemiologic typing method of Pseudomonas aeruginosa outbreaks? Comparison with pulse field gel electrophoresis;L'antibiogramme quantitatif est-il un marqueur epidemiologique fiable des infections a Pseudomonas aeruginosa ? Comparaison a l'electrophorese en champ pulse
a a a a a a |
Author keywords
Epidemiology; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Quantitative antibiogram; Serotyping
|
Indexed keywords
BETA LACTAM ANTIBIOTIC;
ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY;
BACTERIAL INFECTION;
BACTERIUM ISOLATION;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COMPUTER PROGRAM;
CONFERENCE PAPER;
EPIDEMIC;
GEL ELECTROPHORESIS;
HUMAN;
HUMAN CELL;
PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA;
RELIABILITY;
SEROTYPE;
BETA-LACTAM RESISTANCE;
BRONCHOALVEOLAR LAVAGE FLUID;
CROSS INFECTION;
DRUG RESISTANCE, MICROBIAL;
ELECTROPHORESIS, GEL, PULSED-FIELD;
FRANCE;
HUMANS;
MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS;
PHYLOGENY;
PNEUMONIA, BACTERIAL;
PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA;
PSEUDOMONAS INFECTIONS;
RECOVERY ROOM;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
SENTINEL SURVEILLANCE;
SEROTYPING;
|
EID: 0031826644
PISSN: 03698114
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Conference Paper |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (14)
|