Computed radiography versus screen-film mammography in detection of simulated microcalcifications: A receiver operating characteristic study based on phantom images

Academic Radiology

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 173-180

  Shaw, C C ^a   Wang, T P ^a   King, J L ^a   Breltenstein, D S ^a   Chang, T S ^a   Harris, K M ^a   Baratz, A B ^a   Ganott, M A ^a   Reginella, R ^a   Sumkin, J H ^a   Gur, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast; Breast radiography; Calcification; Comparative studies; Diagnostic radiology; Observer performance; Radiography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SIMULATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC;

EID: 0031825755     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(98)80281-X     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Shapiro S Venet W Strax P Venet L Current results of the breast cancer screening randomized trial: the Health Insurance Plan (HIP) of Greater New York study Day NE Miller AB Screening for breast cancer 1988 Hogrefe International Boston, Mass
2. Rowlands JA Hunter DM Araj N X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: a photoinduced discharge readout method for digital mammography Med Phys 18 1991 421 431
3. Yaffe MJ Direct digital mammography using a scanned-slot CCD imaging system Med Prog Technol 19 1993 13 21
4. (abstr) Karellas A Harris LJ D'Orsi CJ Small field digital mammography with a 2,048 × 2,048 pixel charge coupled device Radiology 177 P 1990 288
5. (abstr) Williams MB Liu H Fajardo LL Tran J Spivey BA Imaging properties of a prototype digital detector for full-breast mammography Radiology 197 P 1995 291
6. (abstr) Shaw CC Wang TP Breitenstein DS Herron JM Gur D A high resolution storage phosphor imaging system for mammographic imaging Med Phys 22 1995 997
7. Workman A Cowen AR Brettle DS Physical evaluation of computed radiography as a mammographic x-ray imaging system Br J Radiol 67 1994 988 996
8. Kimme-Smith C Bassett LW Gold RH Gormley L Digital mammography: a comparison of two digitization methods Invest Radiol 24 1989 869 875
9. Oestmann JW Kopans D Hall DA McCarthy KA Rubens JR Greene R A comparison of digitized storage phosphors and conventional mammography in the detection of malignant microcalcifications Invest Radiol 23 1988 725 728
10. Kitahama H Efficacy of storage phosphor-based digital mammography in diagnosis of breast cancer: comparison with filmscreen mammography Nippon Acta Radiol 51 1991 547 560
11. Higashida Y Moribe N Morita K Detection of subtle microcalcifications: comparison of computed radiography and screen-film mammography Radiology 183 1992 483 486
12. Brettle DS Ward SC Parkin GJ Cowen AR Sumsion HJ A clinical comparison between conventional and digital mammography utilizing computed radiography Br J Radiol 67 1994 464 468
13. Chan HP Niklason LT Ikeda DM Lam KL Adler DD Digitization requirements in mammography: effects on computed-aided detection of microcalcifications Med Phys 21 1994 1203 1211
14. Bunch PC Objective imaging characteristics of mammographic screen-film systems Proc SPIE 2708 1996 241 271