Modelling the training effects of kinaesthetic acuity measurement in children

Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 731-746

  Sims, K ^a   Morton, John ^a,b  

^a MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clumsy children; Kinaesthetic; Modelling; Motor skills; School children

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PROPRIOCEPTION; TRAINING;

CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; KINESTHESIS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MOTOR SKILLS; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR DISORDERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0031820373     PISSN: 00219630     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0021963098002649     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bairstow, P. J., & Laszlo, J. I. (1986). Measurement of kinaesthetic sensitivity: A reply to Doyle and colleagues. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 28, 194-197.
2. Cooper, R., Fox, J., Farringdon, J., & Shallice, T. (1996). A systematic methodology for cognitive modelling. Artificial Intelligence, 85, 3-44.
3. Doyle, A. J. R., Elliot, J. M., & Connolly, K. J. (1986). Measurement of kinaesthetic sensitivity. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 28, 188-193.
4. Elliot, J. M., Connolly, K. J., & Doyle, A. J. R. (1988). Development of kinaesthetic sensitivity and motor performance in children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 30, 80-92.
5. Henderson, S. F., & Sugden, D. A. (1992). The Movement Assessment Battery for Children. London: The Psychological Corporation.
6. Laszlo, J. I., (1986). Development of perceptual motor abilities in children from 5 years to Adults. In C. Pratt (Ed.), Research issues in child development (pp. 137-144). Sydney: Allan & Unwin Australia Pty. Ltd.
7. Laszlo, J. I., & Bairstow, P. J. (1985). Test of kinaesthetic sensitivity. London: Holt. Rinehart & Winston.
8. Morton, J. (1986). Developmental contingency modelling. In P. L. C. Van Geert (Ed.), Theory building in developmental psychology (pp. 141-165). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
9. Morton, J., & Frith, U. (1995). Causal modelling: A structural approach to developmental psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Manual of developmental psychopathology, Vol. 1 (pp. 357-390). New York: Wiley.
10. Pentland, A. P. (1980). Maximum likelihood estimation: The best PEST. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 377-379.
11. Polatajko, H. J., Macnab, J. J., Anslett, B., Mallay-Miller, T., Murphy, K. & Noh, S. (1995). A clinical trial of the processoriented-treatment approach for children with developmental coordination disorder. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 37, 310-319.
12. Sims, K., Henderson, S. E., Hulme, C., & Morton J. (1996a). The remediation of clumsiness - 1: An evaluation of Laszlo's kinaesthetic approach. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 38, 976-987.
13. Sims, K., Henderson, S. E., Morton, J., & Hulme, C. (1996b). The remediation of clumsiness 2: Is kinaesthesis the answer? Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 38, 988-997.
14. Stott, D. H., Moyes, F. A., & Henderson, S. F. (1984). Test of Motor Impairment: Henderson revision. Guelph, Canada: Brook Educational Publishing.
15. Taylor, M. M., & Creelman, C. D. (1967). PEST: Efficient estimates on probability functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41, 377-379.
16. Woodworth, R. S., & Schlosberg, H. (1954). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt.