A method for auditing the quality of medical files: An audit of 467 medical cases within the framework of the PMSI quality control;Methode d'audit de la qualite du dossier medical: Audit de 467 dossiers medicaux dans le cadre du controle de qualite PMSI

Sante Publique

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 5-15

  Boulay, F ^a   Chevallier, T ^a   Gendreike, Y ^a   Mailland, V ^a   Joliot, Y ^b   Sambuc, R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CÔTE D'AZUR   (France)

^b Ctr Hosp de Saion de Provence

^c AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Audit; DRG system; Hospital; Medical record; Quality assurance

Indexed keywords

ACCREDITATION; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSIS RELATED GROUP; HOSPITAL SERVICE; MEDICAL RECORD; PRIVATE HOSPITAL; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; QUALITY CONTROL; FRANCE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL STAFF; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARD;

ACCREDITATION; FRANCE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HOSPITALS, PRIVATE; HOSPITALS, PUBLIC; HUMANS; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0031818175     PISSN: 09953914     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Agence Nationale pour le Developpement de l'Evaluation Medicale (ANDEM). L'evaluation des pratiques professionnelles dans les établissements de santé, l'audit clinique. Paris, ANDEM ed, 1994, 69 p
2. Agence Nationale pour le Développement de l'Evaluation Medicale (ANDEM). Evaluation de la tenue du dossier du malade, l'évaluation des pratiques professionnelles dans les établissements de santé. Paris, ANDEM ed, 1994, 69 p.
3. Audet AM, Goodnough LT, Parvin CA. « Evaluating the appropriateness of red blood cell transfusions: the limitations of retrospective medical record reviews ». Int J Qual Health Care 1996, 8, 41-9.
4. Baigne RJ, Dowling BL, Birch D, Dehn TCB. « An audit of the quality of operation notes in two district general hospitals : Are we following Royal College guidelines ? ». Ann Royl Coll of Surg of Engl (Suppl) 1994, 76, 8-10.
5. Donabedian A. The information in . The methods and findings of quality assessment and monitoring : An illustrated analysis. Donabedian A ed. Health Administration Press. Ann Arbor Michigan 1985, 349-75.
6. Heath DA. « Random review of hospital patient records ». Br Med J 1990, 300, 651-2.
7. Holt PE, Anderson B. « Medical record content : Recurring area of concern in hospital analysis ». Aust Clin Rev 1992, 12, 109-14.
8. Kingsley DI, « The importance of documentation in peer review ». New Jersey Med 1989, 86, 185-6.
9. Lyons JF, Payne BC. The relation of physician's medical recording performance to their medical care performance. Med Care 1974, 72, 714-20.
10. Roger France FH. Le résumé du dossier médical. Indicateur informatisé de performance et de qualité des soins. Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain, Thèse d'Agrégation, 1982, 333 p.
11. Rosenfeld LS Quality of medical care in hospitals. AM J Public Heatth 1957, 47, 856-65.
12. Williams JG, Kingham MJ, Morgan JM, Davies AB, « Retrospective review of hospital patient records » Br Med J 1990, 300, 991-3.