Temporal modulation enhances the efficiency of spatial offset discriminations by 6-month-olds

Vision Research

Volumn 38, Issue 14, 1998, Pages 2127-2134

  Dannemiller, James L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Spatial offset discrimination; Temporal modulation; Vernier stimulus

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFANT; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; TIME; VISUAL STIMULATION;

CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FLICKER FUSION; HUMANS; INFANT; MOTION PERCEPTION; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0031814232     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00406-9     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Manny R., Klein S. The development of Vernier acuity in infants. Curr Eye Res. 3:1984;453-462.
2. Shimojo S., Held R. Vernier acuity is less than grating acuity in 2- and 3-month-olds. Vis Res. 27:1987;77-86.
3. Shimojo S., Birch E., Gwiazda J., Held R. Development of Vernier acuity in human infants. Vis Res. 24:1984;721-728.
4. Skoczenski A., Aslin R. Spatiotemporal factors in infant position sensitivity: single bar stimuli. Vis Res. 32:1992;1761-1769.
5. Skoczenski A.M., Aslin R.N. Assessment of Vernier acuity development using the 'equivalent intrinsic blur' paradigm. Vis Res. 35:1995;1879-1887.
6. Zanker J., Mohn G., Weber U., Zeitler-Driess K., Fahle M. The development of Vernier acuity. Vis Res. 32:1992;1557-1564.
7. Aslin R.N., Shea S.L. Velocity thresholds in human infants: implications for the perception of motion. Dev Psychol. 26:1990;589-598.
8. Banton T., Bertenthal B. Infants' sensitivity to uniform motion. Vis Res. 36:1996;1633-1640.
9. Dobkins K.R., Teller D.Y. Infant contrast detectors are selective for direction of motion. Vis Res. 36:1996;281-294.
10. Roessler J., Dannemiller J. Infants' sensitivity to slow displacements over the first six months. Vis Res. 37:1997;417-423.
11. Wattam-Bell J. Development of motion-specific cortical responses in infancy. Vis Res. 31:1991;287-297.
12. Wattam-Bell J. The development of maximum displacement limits for discrimination of motion direction in infancy. Vis Res. 32(4):1992;621-630.
13. Hartmann E.E., Banks M.S. Temporal contrast sensitivity in human infants. Vis Res. 32:1992;1163-1168.
14. Teller D.Y., Lindsey D.T., Mar C.M., Succop A., Mahal M.R. Infant temporal contrast sensitivity at low temporal frequencies. Vis Res. 32:1992;1157-1162.
15. Swanson W.H., Birch E.E. Infant spatiotemporal vision: dependence of spatial contrast sensitivity on temporal frequency. Vis Res. 30:1990;1033-1048.
16. Geisler W.S. Sequential ideal observer analysis of visual discriminations. Psychol Rev. 96:1989;276-314.
17. Gros B.L., Pope D.R., Cohn T.E. Relative efficiency for the detection of apparent motion. Vis Res. 36:1996;2297-2302.
18. Teller D.Y. The forced-choice preferential looking procedure: A psychophysical technique for use with human infants. Infant Behav Dev. 2:1979;135-153.
19. Breitmeyer B.G., Ganz L. Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression and information processing. Psychol Rev. 83:1976;1-33.
20. Green M. Masking by light and the sustained-transient dichotomy. Percept Psychophys. 35:1984;519-535.
21. Freedland R.L., Dannemiller J.L. Detection of stimulus motion in 5-month-old infants. J Exp Psychol: Human Perception and Performance. 13:1987;566-576.