Approximations of open quotient and speed quotient from glottal airflow and EGG waveforms: Effects of measurement criteria and sound pressure level

Journal of Voice

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 31-43

  Sapienza, Christine M ^a   Stathopoulos, Elaine T ^b   Dromey, Christopher ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Criterion; Electroglottography; Glottal airflow; Sound Pressure Level

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLOTTIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LARYNGOGRAPHY; MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; SOUND PRESSURE; WAVEFORM;

EID: 0031813458     PISSN: 08921997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0892-1997(98)80073-8     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Timcke R, Von Leden H, Moore P. Laryngeal vibrations: measurement of the glottic wave. Arch Otolaryngol 1958; 68:1-19.
2. Childers DG. Laryngeal pathology detection. CRC Crit RevBioengin 1977:2:375-426.
3. Childers DG, Smith AM, Moore GP. Relationships between electroglottograph, speech and vocal cord contact. Folia Phoniatr 1984;36:105-18.
4. Anastaplo S, Karnell MP. Synchronous video-stroboscopic and electroglottographic examination of glottal opening. J Acoustical Soc Am 1988;83:1883-90.
5. Fog-Pederson M. Electroglottography compared with synchronous stroboscopy in normal persons. Folia Phoniatr 1977;29:191-99.
6. Fourcin AM. Laryngeal examination of vocal fold vibration. In: Wyke B, ed. Ventilatory and phonatory control system. London: Singular Publishing Group, 1974:315-33.
7. Lecluse FLE, Brocaar MP, Verschurre J. The electroglottograph and its relation to glottal activity. Folia Phoniatr 1975;27:215-24.
8. Baer T, Titze I, Yoshioka H. Multiple simultaneous measures of vocal fold activity. In: Bless DM, Abbs JH, eds. Vocal fold physiology: contemporary research and clinical issues. San Diego, Calif: College-Hill Press, 1983:229-37.
9. Dejonckere PH. Comparison of two methods of photoglottography in relation to electroglottography. Folia Phoniatr 1981;33:338-47.
10. Titze IR, Baer T, Cooper D, Scherer R. Automated extraction of glottographic waveform parameters and regression of acoustic and physiologic variable. In: Bless DM, Abbs JH, eds. Vocal fold physiology: contemporary research and clinical issues. San Diego, Calif: College-Hill Press, 1983: 146-55.
11. Scherer RC, Vail VJ, Rockwell B. Examination of the laryngeal adduction measure EGGW. In: Harris KS, Bell-Berti F, Raphael LJ, eds. Producing speech: contemporary issues. New York, NY: American Institute of Physics, 1995:269-90.
12. Childers DG, Hicks DM, Moore, GP, Eskenazi L, Lalwani AL. Electroglottography and vocal fold physiology. J Speech Hear Res 1990;33:245-54.
13. Rothenberg M. Some relations between glottal airflow and vocal fold contact area. Asha Rep 1981;11:88-96.
14. Rothenberg M, Mahshie J. Monitoring vocal fold abduction through vocal fold contact area. J Speech Hear Res 1988;31:338-51.
15. Hertegard S, Gauffin J, Karlsson I. Physiological correlates of the inverse filtered airflow waveform. J Voice 1992;6(3): 224-34.
16. Dromey C Stathopoulos ET, Sapienza CM. Glottal airflow and electroglottographic measures of vocal function at multiple intensities. J Voice 1992;6:1,44-54.
17. Stathopoulos ET, Sapienza CM. Respiratory and laryngeal function of women and men during vocal intensity variation. J Speech Hear Res 1993a;36:64-75
18. Stathopoulos ET, Sapienza CM. Respiratory and laryngeal measures of children during vocal intensity variation. J Acoust Soc Amer 1993b; 94:2531-43.
19. Colton RH. Glottal waveform variations associated with different vocal intensity levels. In: Transcripts of the Symposium on Care of the Professional Voice. Part I: scientific paper, New York, New York: The Voice Foundation, 1984:26.
20. Higgins M, Saxman J. A comparison of selected phonatory behaviors of healthy aged and young adults. J Speech Hear Res 1991;34:1000-10.
21. Perkell JS, Holmberg EB, Hillman RE. A system for signal processing and data extraction from aerodynamic, acoustic and electroglottographic signals in the study of voice production. J Acoust Soc Amer 1991;89:4,1777-81.
22. Milenkovic P. CSpeech 3.0. University Wisconsin-Madison, Madison: 1989.
23. Milenkovic P. Glottal inverse filtering by joint estimation of an AR model system with a linear input model. IEEE Trans Acoust, Speech Sig Proc 1986;1:19,26-41.
24. Kempster G, Preston J, Mack R, Larson C. A preliminary investigation relating laryngeal muscle activity to changes in EGG waveforms. In: Baer T, Sasaki C, Harris K, eds. Laryngeal function in phonation and respiration, Boston, MA: College-Hill Press, 1987:339-48.
25. Childers DG, Krishnamurthy AK. A critical review of electroglottography. Crit Rev of Biomed Eng 1985;12:131-61.
26. Colton RH, Conture EG. Problems and pitfalls of electroglottography. J Voice 1990;4:10-24.
27. Baken RJ. Electroglottography. J Voice 1992;6,2:98-110.
28. Sapienza CM, Stathopoulos ET. Comparison of maximum flow declination rate: children versus adults. J Voice 1994;8,3:240-7.
29. Gauffin J, Sundberg J. Spectral correlates of glottal voice source waveform characteristics. J Speech Hear Res 1989;32:556-65.
30. Scherer R. Physiology of phonation: a review of basic mechanics. In: Ford CN, Bless DM, eds. Phonosurgery assessment and surgical management of voice disorders. New York, New York: Raven Press, 1991:77-93.
31. Sundberg J. The science of the singing voice. Dekalb: Ill: Northern Illinois University Press, 1987.
32. Holmberg EB, Hillman RE, Perkell JS. Glottal airflow and transglottal air pressure measurements for male and female speakers in soft, normal and loud voice. J Acoust Soc Amer 1988;84:511-29.
33. Childers DG, Hicks DM, Moore GP, Alaska YA. A model for vocal fold vibratory motion, contact area, and the electroglottogram. J Acoust Soc Amer 1986;80:1309-20.