Variation in water-use efficiency and its relation to carbon isotope ratio in cotton

Crop Science

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 782-787

  Saranga, Yehoshua ^a   Flash, Igal ^a   Yakir, Dan ^b  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON ISOTOPE; COTTON; CULTIVAR; DROUGHT RESISTANCE; GENETIC VARIANCE; GOSSYPIUM BARBADENSE; GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; STRESS TOLERANCE; WATER;

GOSSYPIUM; GOSSYPIUM BARBADENSE; GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM; HIRSUTUM;

EID: 0031813444     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800030027x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Cornish, K., J.W. Radin, E.L. Turcotte, Z. Lu, and E. Zeiger. 1991. Enhanced photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of Pima cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) bred for increased yield. Plant Physiol. 97:484-489.
2. Downton, W.J.S., W.J.R. Grant, and S.P. Robinson. 1985. Photosynthetic and stomatal responses of spinach leaves to salt stress. Plant Physiol. 78:85-88.
3. Ehleringer, J.R. 1989. Carbon isotope ratios and physiological processes in arid land plants, p. 41-54. In P.W. Rundel et al. (ed.) Stable isotopes in ecological research. Springer-Verlag, New York.
4. Ehleringer, J.R., A.E. Hall, and G.D. Farquhar (ed.). 1993. Stable isotopes and plant carbon-water relations. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
5. 2 under different environmental conditions. Oecologia 52:121-124.
6. Farquhar, G.D., M.H. O'Leary, and J.A. Berry. 1982b. On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and intercellular carbon dioxide concentration of leaves. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 9:121-137.
7. Farquhar, G.D., J.R. Ehleringer, and K.T. Hubick. 1989. Carbon isotope discrimination in photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Molec. Biol. 40:503-537.
8. Gerik, T.J., J.R. Gannaway, K.M. El-Zik, K.M. Faver, and P.M. Thaxton. 1996. Identifying high yield cotton varieties with carbon isotope analysis, p. 1297-1300. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., vol. 3. Nat. Cotton Council Am., Memphis, TN.
9. Lu, Z., J. Chen, R.G. Percy, M.R. Sharifi, P.W. Rundel, and E. Zeiger. 1996. Genetic variation in carbon isotope discrimination and its relation to stomatal conductance in Pima cotton (Gossypium barbadense). Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 23:127-132.
10. McDaniel, R.G. 1995. Carbon isotopes and cotton breeding, p. 1127-1129. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., vol. 2. Nat. Cotton Council Am., Memphis, TN.
11. Petersen, K.L., M. Fuchs, S. Moreshet, Y. Cohen, and H. Sinoquet. 1992. Computing transpiration of sunlit and shaded cotton foliage under variable water stress. Agron. J. 84:91-97.
12. Pettigrew, W.T., and W.R. Meredith Jr. 1994. Leaf gas exchange parameters vary among cotton genotypes. Crop Sci. 34:700-705.
13. Radin, J.W. 1992. Reconciling water-use efficiencies of cotton in field and laboratory. Crop Sci. 32:13-18.
14. Radin, J.W., Z. Lu, R.G. Percy, and E. Zeiger. 1994. Genetic variability for stomatal conductance in Pima cotton and its relation to improvements of heat adaptation. Proc. Natl, Acad. Sci. (USA) 91:7217-7221.
15. Rosenow, D.T., J.E. Quisenberry, C.W. Wendt, and L.E. Clark, 1983. Drought tolerant sorghum and cotton germplasm. Agric. Water Manag. 7:207-222.
16. SAS Institute. 1995. JMP user's guide. Version 3.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
17. Seemann, J.R., and C. Critchley. 1985. Effects of salt stress on growth, ion content, stomatal behavior and photosynthetic capacity of salt-sensitive species, Phaseolus vulgaris L. Planta 164:151-162.
18. Stanhill, G. 1991. Irrigation in Israel. Contribution No. 3247-E, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel.
19. Yakir, D., M.J. De Niro, and J.E. Ephrath. 1990. Effect of water stress on oxygen, hydrogen and carbon isotope ratios in two species of cotton plants. Plant Cell Environ. 13:949-955.