What have new efforts to change professional practice achieved?

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Supplement

Volumn 91, Issue 35, 1998, Pages 20-25

  Grimshaw, Jeremy M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DOCTOR NURSE RELATION; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PEER REVIEW; PHARMACIST; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PUBLICATION; REVIEW;

DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INFORMATION SERVICES; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MEDICAL AUDIT; PHARMACISTS; TEACHING MATERIALS;

EID: 0031812404     PISSN: 02675331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (3)

1. Antman EM, Lau J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller F, Chalmers TC. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA 1992;268:240-8
2. Lomas J. Teaching old (and not so old) docs new tricks: effective ways to implement research findings. In: Dunn EV, Norton PG, Stewart M, Tudiver F, Bass MJ, eds. Disseminating research/changing practice. Research Methods For Primary Care, Vol. 6. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1994
3. Bero L, Rcnnie D. The Cochrane Collaboration. Preparing, maintaining and disseminating systematic review of the effects of health care. JAMA 1995;274:1935-8