Evaluation of resource selection methods with different definitions of availability

Journal of Wildlife Management

Volumn 62, Issue 2 SUPPL., 1998, Pages 793-801

  Mcclean, Seth A ^a   Rumble, Mark A ^a   King, Rudy M ^a   Baker, William L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

Author keywords

Availability; Merriam's turkeys; Poults; Resource selection analysis

Indexed keywords

HABITAT AVAILABILITY; MERRIAM'S WILD TURKEY; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY; WILD TURKEY;

BLACK HILLS; SOUTH DAKOTA; USA;

MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO; MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO MERRIAMI;

EID: 0031812388     PISSN: 0022541X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3802356     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. AEBISCHER, N. J., P. A. ROBERTSON, AND R. E. KENWARD. 1993. Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74: 1313-1325.
2. AITCHISON, J. 1985. The statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman & Hall, New York, New York, USA.
3. ALLDREDGE, J. R., AND J. T. RATTI. 1986. Comparison of some statistical techniques for analysis of resource selection. Journal of Wildlife Management 50:157-165.
4. AND 1992. Further comparison of some techniques for analysis of resource selection. Journal of Wildlife Management 56:1-9.
5. ALLDREDGE, w. A., R. D. DEBLINGER, AND J. PETERSON. 1991. Birth and fawn bed site selection by pronghoms in a sagebrush-steppe community. Journal of Wildlife Management 55:222-227.
6. BUTTERY, R. F., AND B. C. GILLAM. 19S3. Forest ecosystems. Pages 43-71 in R. L. Hoover and D. L. Wills, editors. Managing forested lands for wildlife. Colorado Division of Wildlife in cooperation with U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Denver, Colorado, USA.
7. CONOVER, W. J. 19SO. Practical nonparametric statistics. Second edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.
8. ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARCH INSTITUTE. 1992. Understanding GIS: the ARC/INFO method. ESRI, Redlands, California, USA.
9. FLEISS, J. L. 1981. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Second edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.
10. HEALY, W. M. 1985. Turkey poult feeding activity, invertebrate abundance, and vegetation structure. Journal of Wildlife Management 49:466-472.
11. HEISEY, D. M. 1985. Analyzing selection experiments with log-linear models. Ecology 66:17441748.
12. HOBBS, T. N., AND T. A. IlANLEY. 1990. Habitat evaluation: do use/availability data reflect carrying capacity? Journal of Wildlife Managment 54:515-522.
13. HOCHBERG, Y, AND A. C. TAMHANE. 1987. Multiple comparison procedures. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.
14. HURST, G. A. 1992. Foods and feeding. Pages 66-83 in J. G. Dickson, editor. The wild turkey: biology and management. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA.
15. JELINSKI, D. E. 1991. On the use of chi-square analyses in studies of resource utilization. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21:58-65.
16. JOHNSON, D. H. 1980. Comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61:65-71.
17. JOHNSON, G. D., AND M. S. BOYCE. 1990. Feeding trials with insects in the diet of sage grouse chicks. Journal of Wildlife Management 54:89-91.
18. KINCAID, W. B., AND E. BRYANT. 1983. A geometric method for evaluating the null hypothesis of random habitat utilization. Ecology 64:1463-1470.
19. MANLY, B. F. J. 1991. Randomization and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman & Hall, New York, New York, USA.
20. L. L. MCDONALD, AND D. L. THOMAS. 1993. Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. Chapman & Hall, New York, New York, USA.
21. MIELKE, P. W, JR. 1986. Non-metric statistical analyses: some metric alternatives. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 13:377-387.
22. AND K. J. BERRY. 1982. An extended class of permutation techniques for matched pairs. Communications Statistics-Theory Methods A 11: 1197-1207.
23. MILLER, R. G., JR. 1981. Simultaneous statistical inference. Second edition. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
24. MORRISON, D. F. 1967. Multivariate statistical methods. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, USA.
25. NEU, C. W., C. R. BYERS, AND J. M. PEEK. 1974. A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. Journal of Wildlife Management 38:541-545.
26. ORIANS, G. H., AND J. F. WITTENBERGER. 1991. Spatial and temporal scales in habitat selection. American Naturalist 137:529-549.
27. PEREIRA, J. M., AND R. M. ITAMI. 1991. GIS-based habitat modeling using logistic multiple regression: a study of the Mt. Graham red squirrel. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 57:1475-1486.
28. PORTER, W. F. 1992. Habitat requirements. Pages 202-213 in J. G. Dickson, editor. The wild turkey: biology and management. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA.
29. AND K. E. CHURCH. 1987. Effects of envi' ronmental pattern on habitat preference analysis. Journal of Wildlife Management 51:681-685.
30. ROBBINS, C. T. 1983. Wildlife feeding and nutrition. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
31. RUMBLE, M. A. 1990. Ecology of Merriam's turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo merriami) in the Black Hills, SD. Dissertation, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, USA.
32. AND S. H. ANDERSON. 1992. Stratification of habitats for identifying habitat selection by Merriam's turkeys. Great Basin Naturalist 52:1-6.
33. AND 1993. Habitat selection of Merriam's turkey hens with poults in the Black Hills, South Dakota. Great Basin Naturalist 53:131-136.
34. AND 1996. Feeding ecology of Merriam's turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo merriami) in the Black Hills, South Dakota. American Midland Naturalist 136:157-171.
35. STATISTICAL PACKAGE FOR THE SOCIAL SCIENCES. 1993. SPSS for windows: base system user's guide. Release 6.0. SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
36. TANGRI, D., AND R. V. S. WRIGHT. 1993. Multivariate analysis of compositional data: applied comparisons favour standard principal components analysis over Aitchison's loglinear contrast method. Archaeometry 35:103-112.
37. THOMAS, D. L., AND E. J. TAYLOR. 1990. Study designs and tests for comparing resource use and availability. Journal of Wildlife Management 54:' 322-330.