Duplex criteria for grading internal carotid artery stenosis >50% based on multiregression analysis

Journal of Neuroimaging

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 132-135

  Zbornikova, Vera ^a,c   Johansson, Ingegerd ^b  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b University of Health Sciences   (Sweden)

^c LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Carotid artery; Duplex scanning; Multiregression analysis; Stenosis >50

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BRAIN ANGIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY OCCLUSION; MALE; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; PULSE PRESSURE; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; COMMON CAROTID ARTERY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ECHOGRAPH; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; PEAK SYSTOLIC VELOCITY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 0031807127     PISSN: 10512284     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jon199883132     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Nicolaides A, Shifrin E, Bradbury A, et al. Angiographic and duplex grading of internal carotid stenosis: Can we overcome the confusion? J Endovasc Surg 1996;3:158-165
2. Blackshear WM, Phillips DJ, Thiele B, et al. Detection of carotid occlusive disease by ultrasonic imaging and pulsed Doppler spectrum analysis. Surgery 1979;86:698-706
3. Roederer GO, Langlois YE, Jaeger K, et al. A simple parameter for accurate classification of severe carotid artery disease. Bruit 1984;8:174-178
4. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. MRC European carotid surgery trial: interim result for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991;337:1235-1243
5. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445-453
6. Suwanvela N, Can U, Furie KL, et al. Carotid Doppler ultrasound criteria for internal carotid artery stenosis based on residual lumen diameter calculated from en bloc carotid endarterectomy specimen. Stroke 1996;27:1965-1969
7. Zbornikova V, Lassvik C, Johansson I. Prospective evaluation of the accuracy of duplex scanning with spectral analysis in carotid artery disease. Clin Physiol 1985;5:257-269
8. Zbornikova V. Carotid artery disease assessed by ultrasonic duplex scanning: a methodological and clinical study [thesis]. Linkoping, Sweden: Linköping University; 1985
9. Zbornikova V, Skoglund L, Lassvik C. Progression of non-operated symptomatic and contralateral asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis ≥50%: long-term follow-up assessed by duplex scanning. J Vasc Invest 1997;3:130-136
10. Blackshear WM, Phillips DJ, Chikos PM, et al. Carotid artery velocity pattern in normal and stenotic vessels. Stroke 1980;11:67-71
11. Norrving B, Cronqvist S. Doppler examination of the carotid arteries: a comparative study with angiography. Acta Neurol Scand 1981;64:241-252
12. Knox RA, Breslau PJ, Strandness Jr DE. A simple parameter for accurate detection of severe carotid disease. Br J Surg 1982;69:230-233
13. Zbornikova V, Lassvik C. Duplex scanning in presumably normal patients of different ages. Ultrasound Med Biol 1986;12:371-378
14. Spencer MP, Whisler D. Transorbital Doppler diagnosis in intracramal arterial stenosis. Stroke 1986;17:916-921