Automated electrocardiograph ST segment trending monitors: Accuracy in detecting myocardial ischemia

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 4-10

  Leung, Jacqueline M ^a   Voskanian, Alen ^a   Bellows, Wayne H ^b   Pastor, Darwin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b KAISER PERMANENTE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HOLTER MONITORING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ST SEGMENT; ST SEGMENT DEPRESSION; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION;

AGED; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY, AMBULATORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0031807123     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199807000-00003     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Biagini A, L'Abbate A, Testa R, et al. Unreliability of conventional visual electrocardiographic monitoring for detection of transient ST-segment changes in a coronary care unit. Eur Heart J 1984;5:784-91.
2. Leung J, O'Kelly B, Browner W, et al. Prognostic importance of postbypass regional wall motion abnormalities in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Anesthesiology 1989;71:16-25.
3. Ellis J, Shah M, Briller J, et al. A comparison of methods for the detection of myocardial ischemia during noncardiac surgery: automated ST-segment analysis systems, electrocardiography, and transesophageal echocardiography. Anesth Analg 1992;75: 764-72.
4. Burns M, Downs W. Clinical evaluation of a bedside ST-segment monitor: computers in cardiology. IEEE 1989:97-100.
5. London M, Ahlstrom L. Validation testing of the spacelabs PC2 ST-segment analyzer. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1995;9: 684-93.
6. Haggmark S, Hohner P, Ostman M. Comparison of hemodynamic, electrocardiographic, mechanical and metabolic indicators of intraoperative myocardial ischemia in vascular surgical patients with coronary artery disease. Anesthesiology 1989;70: 19-25.
7. Smith J, Cahalan M, Benefiel D, et al. Intraoperative detection of myocardial ischemia in high-risk patients: electrocardiography versus two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation 1985;72:1015-21.
8. London M, Tubau J, Wong M, et al. The "natural history" of segmental wall motion abnormalities in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 1990;73:644-55.
9. Battler A, Froelicher V, Gallagher K. Dissociation between regional myocardial dysfunction and ECG changes during ischemia in the conscious dog. Circulation 1980;62:735-44.
10. Sugishita Y, Koseki S, Matsuda M, et al. Dissociation between regional myocardial dysfunction and ECG changes during myocardial ischemia induced by exercise in patients with angina pectoris. Am Heart J 1983;106:1-8.
11. Hauser A, Gangadharan V, Ramos R, et al. Sequence of mechanical, electrocardiographic and clinical effects of repeated coronary artery occlusion in human beings: echocardiographic observations during coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 5:193-7.
12. Eisenberg M, London M, Leung J, et al. Monitoring for myocardial ischemia during noncardiac surgery: a technology assessment of transesophageal echocardiography and 12-lead electrocardiography. JAMA 1992;268:210-6.
13. Lam J, Chaitman B. Exercise lead systems and newer electrocardiographic parameters. J Cardiac Rehabil 1984;4:507-16.
14. Fleiss J. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981.
15. Landis J, Koch G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.
16. Kotrly K, Kotter G, Mortara D, Kampine JP. Intraoperative detection of myocardial ischemia with an ST segment trend monitoring system. Anesth Analg 1984;63:343-5.
17. Griffin R, Kaplan J. Myocardial ischaemia during non-cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia 1987;42:155-9.
18. Krucoff M, Jackson Y, Kehoe M, Kent K. Quantitative and qualitative ST segment monitoring during and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1990;81(Suppl IV): IV20-6.
19. Wohlgelernter D, Cleman M, Highman H, et al. Regional myocardial dysfunction during coronary angioplasty: evaluation by two-dimensional echocardiography and 12 lead electrocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:1245-54.
20. Slogoff S, Keats A, David Y, Igo S. Incidence of perioperative myocardial ischemia detected by different electrocardiographic systems. Anesthesiology 1990;73:1074-81.
21. Berson A, Pipberger H. The low-frequency response of electrocardiographs, a frequent source of recording errors. Am Heart J 1966;71:779-89.
22. Arbeit S, Rubin I, Gross H. Dangers in interpreting the electrocardiogram from the oscilloscope monitor. JAMA 1970;211: 453-6.
23. Tayler D, Vincent R. Artifactual ST segment abnormalities due to electrocadiograph design. Br Heart J 1985;54:121-8.
24. Kaplan J, Thys D. Electrocardiography. In: Miller R, ed. Anesthesia. 3rd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1990;1101-28.
25. Deleted in proof.
26. Baig M, Cowan J, Perrins E. Comparison of unipolar and bipolar ventricular paced evoked responses. Br Heart J 1992;68:398-402.
27. Chaitman B, Hanson J. Comparative sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiographic lead systems. Am J Cardiol 1981;47:1335-49.