Learning from the pupil: A spatial visual channel in the absence of V1 in monkey and human

Brain

Volumn 121, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 1065-1072

  Weiskrantz, Lawrence ^a   Cowey, Alan ^a   Mare, Carolyne Le ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Blindsight; Gratings; Pupillometry; Residual vision; Visual cortex

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; GRATING; HUMAN; LEARNING; LIGHT; MALE; MONKEY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL; PUPIL REFLEX; PUPILLOMETRY; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ANIMALS; BLINDNESS; COLOR; HUMANS; LIGHT; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; PUPIL; REFLEX, PUPILLARY; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0031804454     PISSN: 00068950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/brain/121.6.1065     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Barbur JL, Forsyth PM. Can the pupil response be used as a measure of the visual input associated with the geniculo-striate pathway? Clin Vision Sci 1986; 1: 107-11.
2. Barbur JL, Thomson WD. Pupil response as an objective measure of visual acuity. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1987; 7: 425-29.
3. Barbur JL, Ruddock KH, Waterfield VA. Human visual responses in the absence of the geniculo-calcarine projection. Brain 1980; 103: 905-28.
4. Barbur JL, Thomson WD, Forsyth PM. A new system for the simultaneous measurement of pupil size and two-dimensional eye movements. Clin Vision Sci 1987; 2: 131-42.
5. Barbur JL, Watson JD, Frackowiak RS, Zeki S. Conscious visual perception without V1. Brain 1993; 116: 1293-302.
6. Barbur JL, Harlow JA, Weiskrantz L. Spatial and temporal response properties of residual vision in a case of hemianopia. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1994a; 343: 157-66.
7. Barbur JL, Harlow JA, Sahraie A, Stoerig P, Weiskrantz, L. Responses to chromatic stimuli in the absence of V1: pupillometric and psychophysical studies. In: Vision science and its applications. Opt Soc Am Technical Digest 1994b; 2: 312-5.
8. Blythe IM, Bromley JM, Kennard C, Ruddock KH. Visual discrimination of target displacement remains after damage to the striate cortex in humans. Nature 1986; 320: 619-21.
9. Blythe IM, Kennard C, Ruddock KH. Residual vision in patients with retrogeniculate lesions of the visual pathways. Brain 1987; 110: 887-905.
10. Brent PJ, Kennard C, Ruddock KH. Residual colour vision in a human hemianope: spectral responses and colour discrimination. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1994; 256: 219-25.
11. Cowey A, Stoerig P. The neurobiology of blindsight. Trends Neurosci 1991; 14: 140-5.
12. Cowey A, Stoerig P. Visual detection in monkeys with blindsight. Neuropsychologia 1997; 35: 929-39.
13. Finlay AL, Jones SR, Morland AB, Ogilvie JA, Ruddock KH. Movement in the normal visual hemifield induces a percept in the 'blind' hemifield of a human hemianope. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1997; 264: 267-75.
14. Frederici AD. Syntactic and semantic processes in aphasic deficits: the availability of prepositions. Brain Lang 1982; 15: 245-58.
15. Miller M, Pasik P, Pasik T. Extrageniculostriate vision in the monkey. VII. Contrast sensitivity functions. J Neurophysiol 1980; 43: 1510-26.
16. Pasik P, Pasik T. Visual functions in monkeys after total removal of visual cerebral cortex. Contrib Sensory Physiol 1982; 7: 147-200.
17. Rodman HR, Gross CG, Albright TD. Afferent basis of visual response properties in area MT of the macaque. I. Effects of striate cortex removal. J Neurosci 1989; 9: 2033-50.
18. Schacter DL. Consciousness and awareness in memory and amnesia: critical issues. In: Milner AD, Rugg MD. editors. Neuropsychology of consciousness. London: Academic Press; 1992. p. 179-200.
19. Schacter DL, McAndrews MP, Moscovitch M. Access to consciousness: dissociations between implicit and explicit knowledge in neuropsychological syndromes. In: Weiskrantz L, editor. Thought without language. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1988. p. 242-78.
20. Shimamura AP. Priming effects of amnesia: evidence for a dissociable memory function. Q J Exp Psychol 1986; 38A: 619-44.
21. Stoerig P, Cowey A. Increment-threshold spectral sensitivity in blindsight: evidence for colour opponency. Brain 1991; 114: 1487-512.
22. Stoerig P, Cowey A. Wavelength descrimination in blindsight. Brain 1992; 115: 425-44.
23. Tyler LK. The distinction between implicit and explicit language function: evidence from aphasia. In: Milner AD, Rugg MD, editors. Neuropsychology of consciousness. London: Academic Press; 1992. p. 159-79.
24. Warrington EK, Weiskrantz L. New method of testing long-term retention with special reference to amnesic patients. Nature 1968; 217: 972-4.
25. Weiskrantz L. Blindsight. A case study and implications. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1986.
26. Weiskrantz L. Outlooks for blindsight: explicit methodologies for implicit processes. The Ferrier lecture, 1989. [Review]. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1990; B239: 247-78.
27. Weiskrantz L. Disconnected awareness for detecting, processing, and remembering in neurological patients. [Review]. J R Soc Med 1991; 84: 466-70.
28. Weiskrantz L, Harlow A, Barbur JL. Factors affecting visual sensitivity in a hemianopic subject. Brain 1991; 114; 2269-82.
29. Weiskrantz L, Barbur JL, Sahraie A. Parameters affecting conscious versus unconscious visual discrimination with damage to the visual cortex (V1). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92: 6122-6.