Skin sensitization: Risk assessment

International Journal of Cosmetic Science

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 141-150

  Basketter, D A ^a  

^a UNILEVER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Local lymph node assay; Risk assessment; Skin sensitization

Indexed keywords

CONTACT ALLERGEN;

CONTACT ALLERGY; CONTACT DERMATITIS; EXPOSURE; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE; NONHUMAN; PATCH TEST; PROVOCATION TEST; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN SENSITIZATION;

EID: 0031803963     PISSN: 01425463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-2494.1998.171746.x     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Wahlberg, J.E. and Boman, A. Guinea pig maximisation test. In Current Problems in Dermatology, (K.E. Andersen and H.I. Maibach, eds), Vol. 14, pp. 59-106. Karger, New York (1985).
2. Botham, P.A., Basketter, D.A., Maurer, Th., Mueller, D., Potokar, M. and Bontinck, W.J. Skin sensitization - a critical review of predictive test methods in animal and man. Food Chem. Toxicol. 29, 275-86 (1991).
3. Cronin, M.T.D. and Basketter, D.A. Multivariate QSAR analysis of a skin sensitization database. SAR and QSAR in Environ. Res. 2, 159-79 (1994).
4. Kimber, I., Dearman, R.J., Scholes E.W. and Basketter, D.A. The local lymph node assay: developments and applications. Toxicology, 93, 13-31 (1994).
5. Kimber, I. and Maurer, Th. The Toxicology of Contact Hypersensitivity. Taylor & Francis, London (1996).
6. Gerberick, G.F., Robinson, M.K. and Stotts, J. An approach to allergic contact sensitization risk assessment of new chemicals and product ingredients. Am. J. Contact Dermatitis 4, 205-11 (1993).
7. Calvin, G. Risk management case history - detergents. In Risk Management of Chemicals, M.L. Richardson, (ed.), pp. 120-36. Royal Society of Chemistry, London (1992).
8. Upadhye, M.R. and Maibach, H.I. Influence of area of application of allergen on sensitization in contact dermatitis, Contact Dermatitis 27, 281-6 (1992).
9. Magnusson, B. and Kligman, A.M. Allergic Contact Dermatitis in the Guinea Pig. Charles C. Thomas, Philadelphia (1970).
10. Buehler, E.V. A rationale for the selection of occlusion to induce and elicit delayed contact hypersensitivity in the guinea pig. In Current Problems in Dermatology, (K.E. Andersen and H.I. Maibach, eds), vol. 14, pp. 39-58. Karger, New York (1985).
11. Robinson, M.K., Nusair, T.L., Fletcher, E.R. and Ritz, H.L. A review of the Buehler guinea pig skin sensitization test and its use in a risk assessment process for human skin sensitization. Toxicology 61, 91-107 (1990).
12. Basketter, D.A. and Scholes, E.W. A comparison of the local lymph node assay with the guinea pig maximisation test for the detection of a range of contact allergens. Food Chem. Toxicol. 30, 65-9 (1992).
13. Ritz, H.L., Connor, D.S. and Sauter, E.D. Contact sensitization of guinea-pigs with unsaturated and halogenated sultones. Contact Dermatitis 1, 349-51 (1975).
14. Basketter, D.A. and Goodwin, B.F.J. Investigation of the prohapten concept. Cross reactions between 1,4-substituted benzene derivatives in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 19, 248-53 (1989).
15. Basketter, D.A., Briatico-Vangosa, G., Kaestner, W., Lally, C. and Bontinck, W. Nickel, cobalt and chromium in consumer products: a role in allergic contact dermatitis? Contact Dermatitis 28, 15-25 (1993).
16. Andersen, K.E. and Maibach, H.I. Guinea pig sensitization assays: An overview. In Contact allergy predictive tests in guinea pigs, Current Problems in Dermatology, K.E. Andersen and H.E. Maibach eds), vol. 14, pp. 263-90, Karger, New York (1985).
17. Robinson, M.K., Stotts, J. Danneman, P.J., Nusair, T.L. and Bay, P.H.S. A risk assessment process for allergic contact sensitization. Food Chem. Toxicol. 27, 479-89 (1989).
18. Basketter, D.A. and Gerberick, G.F. Interlaboratory evaluation of the Buehler test. Contact Dermatitis 35, 146-51 (1996).
19. Basketter, D.A., Cookman, G., Gerberick, G.F., Hamaide, N. and Potokar, M. Skin sensitization thresholds: Determination in predictive models. Food Chem. Toxicol. 35, 417-25 (1997).
20. Kimber, I. and Weisenberger, C. A murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergens. Arch. Toxicol. 63, 274-82 (1989).
21. Basketter, D.A., Gerberick, G.F., Kimber, I. and Loveless, S.E. The local lymph node assay - a viable alternative to currently accepted skin sensitization tests. Food Chem. Toxicol. 34, 985-97 (1996).
22. Chamberlain, M. and Basketter, D.A. The local lymph node assay: status of validation. Food Chem. Toxicol. 34, 999-1002 (1996).
23. Botham, P.A., Hilton, J., Evans, C.D., Lees, D. and Hall, T.J. Assessment of the relative skin sensitizing potency of 3 biocides using the murine local lymph node assay. Contact Dermatitis, 25, 172-7 (1991).
24. Basketter, D.A., Roberts, D.W., Cronin, M. and Scholes, E.W. The value of the local lymph node assay in quantitative structure activity investigations. Contact Dermatitis 27, 137-42 (1992).
25. Kimber, I., Hilton, J., Dearman, R.J., Gerberick, G.F., Ryan, C.A., Basketter, D.A., Scholes, E.W., Ladics, G.S., Loveless, S.E., House, R.V. and Guy, A. An international evaluation of the local lymph node assay and comparison of modified procedures. Toxicology 103, 63-73 (1995).
26. Loveless, S.E., Ladics, G.S., Gerberick, G.F., Ryan, C.A., Basketter, D.A., Scholes, E.W., House, R.V., Hilton, J., Dearman, R.J. and Kimber, I. Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial. Toxicology 108, 141-52 (1996).
27. Kimber, I. and Basketter, D.A. Contact sensitization: A new approach to risk assessment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 3, 385-95 (1997).
28. Hilton, J., Dearman, R.J., Harvey, P., Evans, P., Basketter, D.A. and Kimber, I. Estimation of relative skin sensitizing potency using the local lymph node assay: A comparison of formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde. Am. J. Contact Derm. 9, 29-33 (1998).
29. Basketter, D.A., Rodford, RA, Kimber, I., Fallows, M., Smith, I., Wahlberg, J.E. Skin sensitisation risk assessment: a comparative evaluation of three isothiazolinone biocides. Contact Dermatitis (submitted) (1998).
30. Basketter, D.A., Dearman, R.J., Hilton, J. and Kimber, I. Dinitrohalobenzenes: evaluation of relative sensitization potential using the local lymph node assay. Contact Dermatitis 36, 97-100 (1997).
31. Basketter, D.A. The value of animal assays and the quenching phenomenon. Proceedings of the Fragrance Symposium, (P.J. Frosch, J.D. Johansen and I. White, eds), pp. 166-74. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (1997).
32. Basketter, D.A. Current trends in the assessment of contact sensitising potential. Toxicology (submitted) (1998).
33. Stotts, J. Planning, conduct, and interpretation of human predictive sensitization patch tests. In Current Concepts in Cutaneous Toxicity. (V.A. Drill and P. Lazar, eds), pp. 41-55. Academic Press, New York (1980).
34. Nusair, T.L., Danneman, P.J., Stotts, J. and Bay, P.H.S. Consumer products: risk assessment process for contact sensitization. Toxicologist 8, 258-64 (1988).
35. Chan, P.D., Baldwin, R.C., Parson, R.D., Moss, J.N., Sterotelli, R, Smith, J.M. and Hayes, A.W. Kathon biocide: manifestation of delayed contact dermatitis in guinea pigs is dependent on the concentration for induction and challenge. J. Invest. Dermatol. 81, 409-11 (1983).
36. Cardin, C.W., Weaver, J.E. and Bailey, P.T. Dose response assessments of Kathon biocide. (II) Threshold prophetic patch testing. Contact Dermatitis 15, 10-6 (1986).
37. Weaver, J.E., Cardin, C.W. and Maibach, H.I. Dose response assessments of Kathon biocide. I. Diagnostic use and diagnostic threshold patch testing with sensitized humans. Contact Dermatitis 12, 141-5 (1985).
38. Frosch, P.J., Lahti, A., Hannuksela, M., Andersen, K.E., Wilkinson, J.D., Shaw, S. and Lachapelle, J.M. Chloromethylisothiazolone/methylisothiazolone (CMI/MI) use test with a shampoo on patch test positive subjects. Results of a multicentre double blind crossover trial. Contact Dermatitis 32, 210-7 (1995).
39. de Groot, A.C. and Weyland, J.W. Kathon CG: a review. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 18, 350-8 (1988).
40. de Groot, A.C. Methylisothiazolinone/methylchloroisothiazolinone (Kathon CG) allergy: an updated review. Am. J. Contact Dermatitis 1, 151-6 (1990).
41. Robinson, M.K., Parsell, K.W., Breneman, D.L. and Cruze, C.A. Evaluation of the primary skin irritation and allergic contact sensitization potential of transdermal triprolidone. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 17, 103-19 (1991).
42. de Groot, W.H. Sulphonation Technology in the Detergent Industry. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1994).