The Barath Cutting Balloon versus conventional angioplasty - A randomized study comparing acute success rate and frequency of late restenosis

Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 79-85

  Mølstad, Per ^a   Myreng, Yngvar ^a   Golf, Svein ^a   Sirnes, Per A ^a   Kassis, Eli ^b   Abilgaard, Ulrik ^b   Andersen, Poul E ^c   Thuesen, Leif ^d  

^a Feiring Heart Clinic   (Norway)

^b GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^d AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Coronary angiography; Coronary angioplasty; Stents

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; BALLOON CATHETER; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DILATATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESTENOSIS; STENT;

EID: 0031801056     PISSN: 14017431     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14017439850140229     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall, 1991: 455-460.
2. Barath P, Fishbein MC, Van S, Forrester JS. Cutting balloon: A novel approach in percutaneous angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1991; 68: 1249-1252.
3. Beatt KJ, Serruys PW, Luitjen HE, et al. Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: the paradox of increased lumen diameter and restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 258-266.
4. Bonan R, Joyal M, Untenberg C, et al. Multicentric experience with a cutting balloon for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. In hospital results and restenosis rate (abstr). Eur Heart J 1994; 15: 335.
5. Ellis SG, Muller DWM. Arterial injury and the enigma of coronary restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 275-277.
6. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 496-501.
7. Funamoto M, Tsuchikane E, Moriguchi K, Otsuji S, Tateyama H, Awata N. Cutting balloon angioplasty vs. plain old balloon angioplasty randomized study in type B/C lesions (CAPAS) (abstr). J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 316A.
8. Hearn JA, King 3d SB, Douglas Jr JS, Carlin SF, Lembo NJ, Ghazzal ZM. Clinical and angiographic outcomes after coronary artery stenting for acute or threatened closure after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Initial results with a balloon-expandable, stainless steel design. Circulation 1993; 88: 2086-2096.
9. Hirshfeld JW, Schwartz JS, Jugo R, et al. Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: a multivariate statistical model to relate lesion and procedure variables to restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18; 647-656.
10. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Popma JJ, et al. Chronic arterial responses to stent implantation; a serial intravascular ultrasound analysis of Palmaz-Schatz stents in native coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 1134-1139.
11. Hosokawa H, Suzuki T, Tani T. A randomized study of cutting balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty: preliminary results (abstr). J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 69A.
12. Kuntz RE, Safian RD, Levine MJ, Reis GJ, Diver DJ, Baim DS. Novel approach to the analysis of restenosis after the use of three new coronary devices. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 1493-1499.
13. Menard S. Applied logistic regression analysis. Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, 07-106. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 1995: 19-24.
14. Popma JJ, Kuntz RE. Pharmacological restenosis trials. In: Topol EJ, Serruys PW, ed. Interventional Cardiology. Philadelphia: Current Medicine; 1994: 4.2-4.15.
15. Rensing BJ, Hermans WR, Deckers JW, de Feyter PJ, Tijssen JG, Serruys PW. Lumen narrowing after percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty follows a near gaussian distribution: a quantitative angiographic study in 1445 successfully dilated lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 939-945.
16. Ryan TJ, Bauman WB, Kennedy JW, et al. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures. Circulation 1993; 88: 2987-3007.
17. Schwartz R, Homes D, Topol E. The restenosis paradigm revisited: An alternative proposal for cellular mechanisms. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20: 1284-1293.
18. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 489-495.
19. Serruys PW, Luijten HE, Beatt KJ, et al. Incidence of restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty: a time-related phenomenon. A quantitative angiographic study in 342 consecutive patients at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months. Circulation 1988; 77: 361-371.
20. Sirnes PA, Golf S, Myreng Y, et al. Stenting in chronic coronary occlusion (SICCO): A randomized, controlled trial of adding stent implantation after successful angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 1441-1451.
21. Sirnes PA, Myreng Y, Mølstad P, Golf S. Reproducibilty of quantitative coronary analysis: assessment of variability due to frame selection, different observers and different cinefilmless laboratories. Int J Card Imaging 1996; 12: 197-203.
22. Unterberg C, Buchwald AB, Barath P, Schmidt T, Kreuzer H, Wiegand V. Cutting balloon coronary angioplasty - initial clinical experience. Clin Cardiol 1993; 16: 660-664.
23. Weintraub WS, Kosinski AS, Brown CL, King III SB. Can restenosis after coronary angioplasty be predicted from clinical variables? J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 6-14.