Botanical dermatology

International Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 321-334

  McGovern, Thomas W ^a   Barkley, Theodore M ^b  

^a Irwin Army Community Hospital   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOTANY; CONTACT URTICARIA; DERMATITIS; DERMATOLOGY; HUMAN; PHOTOTOXICITY; REVIEW; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN DISEASE;

DERMATITIS, CONTACT; HUMANS; PLANTS; URTICARIA;

EID: 0031798546     PISSN: 00119059     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-4362.1998.00385.x     Document Type: Review

References (95)

1. Hansen M. Identification of plants. Semin Dermatol 1996; 15: 122-123.
2. Gillis WT. The systematics and ecology of poison-ivy and the poison-oaks (Toxicodendron, Anacardiaceae). Rhodora 1971; 73: 72-159, 161-273, 370-443, 465-540.
3. Anonymous. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Tokyo Code), 15th edn. Konigstein, Germany: Koeltz Scientific Books, 1994.
4. Woodland DW. Contemporary Plant Systematics, 2nd edn. Berrien Springs, MI: Andrews University Press, 1997.
5. Kulze A, Greaves M. Contact urticaria caused by stinging nettles. Br J Dermatol 1988; 119: 269-270.
6. Lahti A. Contact urticaria to plants. Clin Dermatol 1986; 4: 127-136.
7. Southcott RV, Haegi LAR. Plant hair dermatitis. Med J Aust 1992; 156: 623-632.
8. Lovell CR. Current topics in plant dermatitis. Semin Dermatol 1996; 15: 113-121.
9. Epstein WL. Plant-induced dermatitis. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16: 950-955.
10. Martinez TT, Jerome M, Barry RC, et al. Removal of cactus spines from the skin: a comparative evaluation of several methods. Am J Dis Child 1987; 141: 1291-1292.
11. Lindsey D, Lindsey W. Cactus spine injuries. Am J Emerg Med 1988; 6: 362-369.
12. Stoner JG. Miscellaneous dermatitis-inducing plants. Clin Dermatol 1986; 4: 94-101.
13. Webster GL. Irritant plants in the spurge family (Euphorbiaceae). Clin Dermatol 1986; 4: 36-45.
14. Taussig SJ, Batkin S. Bromelain, the enzyme complex of pineapple (Ananas comosus) and its clinical application, an update. J Ethnopharmacol 1988; 22: 191-203.
15. Williams SR, Clark RF, Dunford JV. Contact dermatitis associated with capsaicin: Hunan hand syndrome. Ann Emerg Med 1995; 25: 713-715.
16. Jones LA, Tandberg D, Troutman WG. Household treatment for "chile burns" of the hands. Clin Toxicol 1987; 25: 483-491.
17. Mabberley DJ. The Plant-Book, 1st edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
18. Gonzalez E, Gonzalez S. Drug photosensitivity, idiopathic photodermatoses, and sunscreens. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996; 35: 871-885.
19. Mitchell J, Rook A. Botanical Dermatology. Vancouver: Greengrass, 1979.
20. Pathak MA. Phytophotodermatitis. Clin Dermatol 1986; 4: 102-121.
21. White JC. Notes on dermatitis venenata. Boston Med Surg J 1897; 136: 177-179.
22. Stowers JJ. Dermatological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Report of the Annual Meeting. Br J Dermatol Syphilol 1897; 9: 275-285.
23. Klaber R. Phytophotodermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1942; 54: 193-211.
24. Kavli G, Volden G. Phytophotodermatitis. Photodermatol 1984; 1: 65-75.
25. Puig L, deMoragas JM. Enhancement of PUVA phototoxic effects following celery ingestion: cool broth also can burn. Arch Dermatol 1994; 130: 809-810.
26. Goskowicz MO, Friedlander SF, Eichenfield LF. Endemic "lime" disease: phytophotodermatitis in San Diego county. Pediatrics 1994; 93: 828-830.
27. Hann SK, Park Y, Im S, Byun SW. Angelica-induced phytophotodermatitis. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1991; 8: 84-85.
28. Nigg HN, Nordby HE, Beier RC, et al. Phototoxic coumarins in limes. Fd Chem Toxic 1993; 31: 331-335.
29. Ljunggren B. Severe phototoxic burn following celery ingestion. Arch Dermatol 1990; 116: 1334-1336.
30. Lovell CR. Plants and the Skin, 1st edn. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1993.
31. Birmingham J, Key MM, Tublich GE. Phototoxic bullae among celery harvesters. Arch Dermatol 1961; 83: 73.
32. Tunget CL, Turchen SG, Manoguerra AS, et al. Sunlight and the plant: a toxic combination: severe phytophotodermatitis from Cneoridium dumosum. Cutis 1994; 54: 400-402.
33. Elpern DJ, Mitchell JC. Phytophotodermatitis from mokihana fruits (Pelea aniata H. Mann, fam. Rutaceae) in Hawaiian lei. Contact Dermatol 1984; 10: 224-226.
34. Bhutani JK, Rao DS. Photocontact dermatitis caused by Parthenium hysterophorus. Dermatologica 1978; 157: 206-209.
35. Kavli G, Volden G, Raa J. Accidental induction of photocontact allergy to Heracleum laciniatum. Acta Dermato Venereologica 1982; 62: 435-438.
36. Ljunggren B. Psoralen photoallergy caused by plant contact. Contact Dermatol 1977; 3: 85-90.
37. Guin JD, Beaman JH. Toxicohendrons of the United States. Clin Dermatol 1986; 4: 137-148.
38. Brizicky GK. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Rhus (Anacardiaceae). J Arnold Arbor 1963; 44: 60-80.
39. Guin JD. The black spot test for recognizing poison ivy and related species. J Am Acad Dermatol 1980; 2: 332-333.
40. Fisher AA. Poison ivy/oak dermatitis. Part I: prevention - soap and water, topical barriers, hyposensitization. Cutis 1996; 57: 384-386.
41. Baer H. Chemistry and immunochemistry of poisonous Anacardiaceae. Clin Dermatol 1986; 4: 152-159.
42. Epstein WL. The poison ivy picker of Pennypack Park: the continuing saga of poison ivy. J Invest Dermatol 1987; 88: 7s-11s.
43. Lampe KF. Dermatitis-producing Anacardiaceae of the Caribbean area. Clin Dermatol 1986; 4: 171-182.
44. Beaman JH. Allergenic Asian Anacardiaceae. Clin Dermatol 1986; 4: 191-203.
45. Hurtado I. Poisonous Anacardiaceae of South America. Clin Dermatol 1986; 4: 183-190.
46. Findlay GH. Dermatitis of 'poison ivy' type from an indigenous South African plant - Smodingium argutum E. Mey (Anacardiaceae). S Afr Med J 1963; 37: 883-888.
47. Kawai K, Nakagawa M. Liew FM, Yasung H. Hyposensitization to urushiol among Japanese lacquer craftsmen; results of patch tests on students learning the art of lacquerware. Contact Dermatol 1991; 25: 290-295.
48. Nakamura T. Ginkgo tree dermatitis. Clin Dermatol 1985; 12: 281-282.
49. Tomb RR, Foussereau J, Sell Y. Mini-epidemic of contact dermatitis from ginkgo tree fruit (Ginkgo biloba L.) Contact Derm 1988; 19: 281-283.
50. Fisher AA. Poison ivy/oak/sumac. Part II: specific features. Cutis 1996; 58: 22-24.
51. Resnick SD. Poison-ivy and poison-oak dermatitis. Clin Dermatol 1986; 4: 208-212.
52. Mallory SB, Hurwitz RM. Black-spot poison-ivy dermatitis. Clin Dermatol 1986; 4: 149-151.
53. Marks JG, Fowler Jr, Sheretz EF, Rietschel RL. Prevention of poison ivy and poison oak allergic contact dermatitis by quaternium-18 bentonite. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 33: 212-216.
54. Watson ES. Toxicodendron hyposensitization programs. Clin Dermatol 1986; 4: 160-170.
55. Warshaw EM, Zug KA. Sesquiterpene lactone allergy. Am J Contact Derm 1996; 7: 1-23.
56. Wrangsjo K, Ros AM. Compositae allergy. Semin Dermatol 1996; 15: 87-94.
57. Ducombs G, Benezra C, Talaga P, et al. Patch testing with the "sesquiterpene lactone mix": a marker for contact allergy to Compositae and other sesquiterpene-lactone-containing plants. Contact Derm 1990; 22: 249-252.
58. Guin JD. Sesquiterpene-lactone dermatitis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 1989; 9: 447-461.
59. Hausen BM. A 6-year experience with Compositae mix. Am J Contact Derm 1996; 7: 94-99.
60. Green C, Ferguson J. Sesquiterpene lactone mix is not an adequate screen for Compositae allergy. Contact Derm 1994; 31: 151-153.
61. Fisher AA. Esoteric contact dermatitis. Part IV: devastating contact dermatitis in India produced by American Parthenium weed (The Scourge of India). Cutis 1996; 57: 297-298.
62. Schmidt RJ. Compositae. Clin Dermatol 1986; 4: 46-61.
63. Mitchell JC. Frullania (liverwort) phytodermatitis (woodcutter's eczema). Clin Dermatol 1986; 4: 62-64.
64. Paulsen E, Andersen KE. Compositae dermatitis in a Danish dermatology department in 1 year (II). Clinical features in patients with Compositae contact allergy. Contact Derm 1993; 29: 195-201.
65. Menz J, Winkelmann RK. Sensitivity to wild vegetation. Contact Derm 1987; 16: 169-173.
66. Manzano D, Aguirre A, Gardeazabal J, et al. Airborne allergic contact dermatitis due to wild plants. Contact Derm 1994; 31: 188-189.
67. Sharma SC, Tanwar RC, Kaur S. Contact dermatitis from chryanthemums in India. Contact Derm 1989; 21: 69-71.
68. Sharma SC, Kaur S. Airborne contact dermatitis from Compositae plants in northern India. Contact Derm 1989; 21: 1-5.
69. Ross JS, du Peloux Menage H, Hawk JLM. Sesquiterpene lactone contact sensitivity: clinical pattern of Compositae dermatitis and relationship to chronic actinic reticuloid syndrome. Contact Derm 1993; 29: 84-87.
70. Murphy GM, White IR, Hawk JLM. Allergic airborne contact dermatitis to Compositae with photosensitivity -chronic actinic dermatitis in evolution. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1990; 7: 38-39.
71. Frain-Bell W, Johnson BE. Contact allergic sensitivity to plants and the photosensitivity dermatitis and actinic reticuloid syndrome. Br J Dermatol 1979; 101: 503-512.
72. Srinivas CR, Balachandran C, Shenoi SD, Acharya S. Azathioprine in the treatment of Parthenium dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1991; 124: 394-395.
73. Delaney TA, Donnelly AM. Garlic dermatitis. Australas J Dermatol 1996; 37: 109-110.
74. Canduela V, Mongil I, Carrascosa . Garlic: always good for the health: Br J Dermatol 1995; 132: 161-162.
75. Acciai MC, Brusi C, Francalanci S, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis in caterers. Contact Derm 1993; 28: 48.
76. Apted JH. Contact dermatitis due to Alstroemeria (Peruvian Lily). Australas J Dermatol 1990; 31: 111-113.
77. Marks JG. Allergic contact dermatitis to Alstroemeria. Arch Dermatol 1988; 124: 914-916.
78. Gette MT, Marks JG. Tulip fingers. Arch Dermatol 1990; 126: 203-205.
79. Rycroft RJG. Dermatitis in florists. Semin Dermatol 1996; 15: 83-86.
80. Santucci B, Picardo M, Iavarone C, Trogolo C. Contact dermatitis to Alstroemeria. Contact Derm 1985; 12: 215-219.
81. Epstein E. Primula contact dermatitis: an easily overlooked diagnosis. Cutis 1990; 45: 411-416.
82. Santucci B, Picardo M. Occupational contact dermatitis to plants. Clin Dermatol 1992; 10: 157-165.
83. O'Malley MA, Thun M, Morrison J, et al. Surveillance of occupational skin disease using the supplementary data system. Am J Industr Med 1988; 13: 291-299.
84. Merrick C, Fenney J, Clarke EC, et al. A survey of skin problems in floristry. Contact Derm 1991; 24: 306.
85. Bethea LK, Schuman SH, Smith-Phillips SE, Kelly JW. South Carolina florists dermatitis: case report and survey results. J South Carolina Med Assoc 1988; 9: 446-448.
86. Thiboutot DM, Hamory BH, Marks JG. Dermatoses among floral shop workers. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990; 22: 54-58.
87. Hausen BM, Oestmann G. Untersuchungen uber die Haufigkeit berufsbedingter allergischer Hauterkrankungen auf einem Blumengrossmarkt. Dermatosen In Beruf und Umwelt 1988; 36: 117-124.
88. Hoogasian C. Dermatitis concerns spark industry study. Florist 1988; 21: 95-99.
89. Periera F. Hand dermatitis in florists. Contact Derm 1996; 34: 144-145.
90. Oltman J, Hensler R. Poison oak/ivy and forestry workers. Clin Dermatol 1986; 4: 213-216.
91. Epstein WL. Occupational poison ivy and oak dermatitis. Dermatol Clin 1994; 12: 511-516.
92. Pecegueiro M, Brandao FM. Airborne contact dermatitis to plants. Clin Dermatol 1985; 13: 277-279.
93. Hardin JW, Arena JM. Human Poisoning from Native and Cultivated Plants. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1969.
94. Seligman PJ, Mathias CGT, O'Malley MA, et al. Phytophotodermatitis from celery among grocery store workers. Arch Dermatol 1987; 123: 1478-1482.
95. Coffman K, Boyce WT, Hansen RC. Phytophotodermatitis simulating child abuse. Am J Dis Child 1985; 139: 239-240.