Analysis of nitrate-nitrogen movement near high-capacity irrigation wells

Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 148-156

  Chen, Xunhong ^a   Ayers, Jerry F ^a,b,c   Gosselin, David C ^a,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS   (United States)

^e SOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MINES AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; IRRIGATION SYSTEM; MATHEMATICAL METHOD; NITRATE; NITROGEN;

AQUIFER; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; IRRIGATION SYSTEM; NITRATE; NITROGEN; NUMERICAL METHOD; PUMPING;

NEBRASKA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0031797978     PISSN: 10693629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.1998.tb00174.x     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Allen, M.B., III, I. Herrera, and G.F. Pinder. 1988. Numerical Modeling in Science and Engineering. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Anderson, M.P., and W.W. Woessner. 1992. Applied Ground-water Modeling. San Diego, California: Academic Press Inc.
3. Ayers, J.F., and D.C. Gosselin. 1995. Design of a multi-level monitoring well for continuous sample collection. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 15, no. 4: 119-124.
4. Ayers, J.F., X.H. Chen, and D.C. Gosselin. 1998. Behavior of nitrate-nitrogen movement around a pumping high-capacity well: A field example. Ground Water 36, no. 2: 325-337.
5. Bair, E.S., and T.D. Lahm. 1996. Variations in capture-zone geometry of a partially penetrating pumping well in an unconfined aquifer. Ground Water 34, no. 5: 842-852.
6. Carnahan, B., H.A. Luther, and J.O. Wilkes. 1969. Applied Numerical Methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
7. Cooley, R.L. 1992. A modular finite-element model (MODFE) for areal and axisymmetric ground-water flow problems, part 2: Derivation of finite-element equations and comparisons with analytical solutions, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations of the United States Geological Survey, Book 6, Ch. A4. Denver, Colorado: USGS.
8. Gosselin, D.C., J.F. Ayers, and Y.K. Zhang. 1994. Modeling concentration variations in high-capacity wells: Implications for ground-water sampling. Water Resources Bulletin 30, no. 5: 613-622.
9. Neuman, S.P. 1972. Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed response of the water table. Water Resources Research 8, no. 4: 1031-1045.
10. Neuman, S.P. 1974. Effect of partial penetration on flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response. Water Resources Research 10, no. 2: 303-312.
11. Pandit, A., and J.M.A. Aoun. 1994. Numerical modeling of axisymmetric flow. Ground Water 32, no. 3: 458-464.
12. Pinder, G.F., and W.G. Gray. 1977. Finite Element Simulation in Surface and Subsurface Hydrology. New York: Academic Press.
13. Reilly, T.E. 1984. A Galerkin finite-element flow model to predict the transient responses of a radially symmetric aquifer. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2198.
14. Reilly, T.E., and J. Gibs. 1993. Effects of physical and chemical heterogeneity on water-quality samples obtained from wells. Ground Water 31, no. 5: 805-813.
15. Schafer, D.C. 1996. Determining 3D capture zones in homogeneous, anisotropic aquifers. Ground Water 34, no. 4: 628-639.
16. Wang, H.F., and M.P. Anderson. 1982. Introduction to Ground-water Modeling: Finite Difference and Finite Element Methods. San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman and Co.