Comparison of 2 homogeneous high-density lipoprotein cholesterol assays

Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 122, Issue 11, 1998, Pages 1005-1009

  Hoang, Mai P ^a   Hirany, Shaina V ^b   Parupia, Joseph ^c   Devaraj, Sridevi ^a   Jialal, Ishwarlal ^a,b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^b PARKLAND HEALTH AND HOSPITAL SYSTEM   (United States)

^c VA NORTH TEXAS HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIGH DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; TRIACYLGLYCEROL;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CHOLESTEROL BLOOD LEVEL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL LABORATORY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; HYPERTRIGLYCERIDEMIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUANTITATIVE ASSAY; REFERENCE VALUE; TRIACYLGLYCEROL BLOOD LEVEL;

CHOLESTEROL; CHOLESTEROL, HDL; CLINICAL CHEMISTRY TESTS; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; HYPERTRIGLYCERIDEMIA; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TRIGLYCERIDES;

EID: 0031797458     PISSN: 00039985     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. The Expert Panel. Summary of the second report of the NCEP expert panel on detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel II). JAMA. 1993;269:3015-3023.
2. Warnick GR, Cheung MC, Albers JJ. Comparison of current methods for high density lipoprotein cholesterol quantification. Clin Chem. 1979;25:596-604.
3. Warnick GR, Wood PD. National Cholesterol Education Program recommendations for measurement of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol executive summary. Clin Chem. 1995;41:1427-1433.
4. Harris N, Galpchian V, Rifai N. Three routine methods for measuring high-density lipoprotein cholesterol compared with the reference method. Clin Chem. 1996;42:738-743.
5. Huang Y, Kao J, Tsai K. Evaluation of two homogeneous methods for measuring high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Clin Chem. 1997;43:1048-1055.
6. Okamoto Y, Tanaka S, Nakano H. Direct measurement of HDL cholesterol preferable to precipitation method [letter]. Clin Chem. 1995;41:1784.
7. Nauck M, Marz W, Haas B, Wieland H. Homogenous assay for direct determination of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol evaluated. Clin Chem. 1996; 42:424-429.
8. 2+ method. Clin Chem. 1997;43:816-823.
9. Nauck M, Marz W, Jarausch J, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a homogeneous assay for HDL-cholesterol without sample pretreatment. Clin Chem. 1997; 43:1622-1629.
10. Sugiuchi H, Uji Y, Okabe H, et al. Direct measurement of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in serum with polyethylene glycol-modified enzymes and sulfated α-cyclodextrin. Clin Chem. 1995;41:717-723.
11. Hubbard RS, Hirany SV, Devaraj S, Martin L, Parupia J, Jialal I. Evaluation of a rapid homogeneous method for direct measurement of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Am J Clin Pathol. 1998. In press.
12. Jialal I, Hirany SV, Devaraj S, Sherwood TA. Comparison of an immunoprecipitation method for direct measurement of LDL cholesterol and beta-quantification (ultracentrifugation). Am J Clin Pathol. 1995;41:232-240.
13. Bachorik PS, Ross JW. National Cholesterol Education Program recommendations for the measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: executive summary. Clin Chem. 1995;41:1414-1420.
14. Reed RG. In search of the ideal measure of high density lipoprotein. Clin Chem. 1997;43:1809-1810.