Social monogamy and extra-pair fertilization in an Australian lizard, Tiliqua rugosa

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 63-72

  Bull, C Michael ^a   Cooper, Steven J B ^b   Baghurst, Ben C ^a  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM   (Australia)

Author keywords

Extra pair fertilization; Lizards; Microsatellite DNA; Monogamy

Indexed keywords

EXTRA-PAIR COPULATION; LIZARD; MONOGAMY;

AUSTRALIA;

TILIQUA RUGOSA;

EID: 0031794241     PISSN: 03405443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002650050515     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Birkhead TR, MØller AP (1992) Sperm competition in birds: evolutionary causes and consequences. Academic Press, London
2. Birkhead TR, MØller AP (1996) Monogamy and sperm competition in birds. In: Black JM (ed) Partnerships in birds: the study of monogamy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 323-343
3. Black JM (1996) Introduction: pair bonds and partnerships. In: Black JM (ed) Partnerships in birds: the study of monogamy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3-20
4. Bull CM (1987) A population study of the viviparous Australian lizard Trachydosaurus rugosus (Scincidae). Copeia 1987:749-757
5. Bull CM (1988) Mate fidelity in an Australian lizard Trachydosaurus rugosus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:45-49
6. Bull CM (1990) Comparisons of displaced and retained partners in a monogamous lizard. Aust Wildl Res 17:135-140
7. Bull CM (1994) Population dynamics and pair fidelity in sleepy lizards. In: Vitt LJ, Pianka ER (ed) Lizard ecology: historical and experimental perspectives. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 159-174
8. Bull CM (1995) Population ecology of the sleepy lizard, Tiliqua rugosa, at Mt Mary, South Australia. Aust J Ecol 20:393-402
9. Bull CM, Baghurst BC (1998) Home range overlap of mothers and their offspring in the sleepy lizard, Tiliqua rugosa. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:357-362
10. Bull CM, Pamula Y (1996) Sexually dimorphic head sizes and reproductive success in the sleepy lizard Tiliqua rugosa. J Zool 240:511-521
11. Bull CM, Pamula Y (in press) Enhanced vigilance in monogamous pairs of the lizard, Tiliqua rugosa. Behav Ecol
12. Bull CM, McNally A, Dubas G (1991) Asynchronous seasonal activity of male and female sleepy lizards. Tiliqua rugosa. J Herpetol 25:436-441
13. Bull CM, Bedford GS, Schulz BA (1993a) How do sleepy lizards find each other? Herpetologica 49:294-300
14. Bull CM, Pamula Y, Schulze LR (1993b) Parturition in the sleepy lizard Tiliqua rugosa. J Herpetol 27:489-492
15. Clutton-Brock TH (1989) Mammalian mating systems. Proc R Soc Lond B 235:339-372
16. Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
17. Cogger HG (1992) Reptiles and amphibians of Australia, 5th edn. Reed, Sydney
18. Cooper SJB, Bull CM, Gardner M (1997) Characterization of microsatellite loci from the socially monogamous lizard Tiliqua rugosa using a PCR-based isolation technique. Mol Ecol 6:793-795
19. Cooper WE, Vitt LJ (1997) Maximizing male reproductive success in the broad-headed skink (Eumeces laticeps): preliminary evidence for mate guarding, size-assortative pairing, and opportunistic extra-pair mating. Amphib Reptil 18:59-73
20. Cowles RB (1944) Parturition in the yucca night lizard. Copeia 1944:98-100
21. Crews D (1975) Psychobiology of reptilian reproduction. Science 189:1059-1065
22. Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215-223
23. Fricke HW (1986) Pair swimming and mutual partner guarding in monogamous butterflyfish (Pisces: Chaetodontidae): a joint advertisement of territory. Ethology73:307-333
24. Gagneux P, Woodruff DS, Boesch C (1997) Furtive mating in female chimpanzees. Nature 387:358-359
25. Gowaty PA (1996) Battles of the sexes and origins of monogamy. In: Black JM (ed) Partnerships in birds: the study of monogamy. Oxford University Press. Oxford, pp 21-52
26. Grist SA, Firgaira FA, Morley AA (1993) Dinucleotide repeat polymorphisms isolated by the polymerase chain reaction. Biotechniques 15:304-309
27. Hasegawa M (1985) Effects of brooding on egg mortality in the lizard Eumeces okadae on Miyake-Jima, Izu Islands. Copeia 1985:497-500
28. Hoggren M, Tegelstrom H (1995) DNA fingerprinting shows within-season multiple paternity in the adder (Vipera berus). Copeia 1995:271-277
29. Hutchinson MN (1993) Family Scincidae. In: Glasby CJ, Ross GJB, Beesley PL (ed) Fauna of Australia, vol 2A, Amphibia and Reptilia. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, pp 261-279
30. Kenward RE, Hodder KH (1996) Ranges V. An analysis system for biological location data. NERC, Wareham, UK
31. Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR, Ballinger RE (1997) Neonate-female associations in Xenosaurus newmanorum: a case of parental care in a lizard? Herpetol Rev 28:22-23
32. Luiselli L (1995) The mating strategy of the European adder, Vipera berus. Acta Oecol 16:375-388
33. Madsen T, Shine R, Loman J, Hakansson T (1992). Why do female adders copulate so frequently? Nature 355:440-441
34. McComb K (1987) Roaring by red deer stags advances the date of oestrous in hinds. Nature 330:648-649
35. Olsson M (1995) Territoriality in Lake Eyre dragons Ctenophorus maculosus: are males "superterritorial"? Ethology 101:222-227
36. Olsson M, Gullberg A, Tegelstrom H (1994) Sperm competition in the sand lizard, Lacerta agilis. Anim Behav 48:193-200
37. Olsson M, Madsen T (1995) Female choice on male quantitative traits in lizards - why is it so rare? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:179-184
38. Olsson M, Shine R, Madsen T, Gullberg A, Tegelstrom H (1996) Sperm selection by females. Nature 383:585
39. Petney TN, Bull CM (1984) Microhabitat selection by two reptile ticks at their parapatric boundary. Aust J Ecol 9:233-239
40. Stamps JA (1983) Sexual selection, sexual dimorphism, and territoriality. In: Huey RB, Pianka ER, Schoener TW (ed) Lizard ecology: studies of a model organism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp 169-204
41. Tegelstrom H, Hoggren M (1994) Paternity determination in the adder (Vipera berus), DNA fingerprinting or random amplified polymorphic DNA? Biochem Genet 32:249-256
42. Vitt LE, Cooper WE (1989) Maternal care in skinks (Eumeces). J Herpetol 23:29-34
43. Wickler W, Seibt U (1983) Monogamy: an ambiguous concept. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 33-50
44. Yeatman EM (1988) Resource partitioning by three congeneric species of skink (Tiliqua) in sympatry in South Australia. PhD thesis, Flinders University of South Australia