A partial matching theory of the mirror effect in immediate probed recognition

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 1196-1213

  Murray, David J ^a   Burhop, Jason ^a   Centa, Stephen ^a   Chande, Nikil ^a   Oinonen, Kirsten ^a   Thomas, Terry ^a   Wilkie, Treena ^a   Farahmand, Bahar ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MICROCOMPUTER; NORMAL HUMAN; RECOGNITION; SPEECH ARTICULATION;

EID: 0031793983     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03201195     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. BAHRICK, H. P., & BAHRICK, P. O. (1964). A re-examination of the interrelations among measures of retention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 318-324.
2. BROWN, J., LEWIS, V. J., & MONK, A. F. (1977). Memorability, word frequency, and negative recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 461-473.
3. CLARK, S. E., & GRONLUND, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37-60.
4. ELLIOTT, P. B. (1964). Tables of d′. In J. A. Swets (Ed.), Signal detection and recognition by human observers (pp. 651-84). New York: Wiley.
5. GLANZER, M., & ADAMS, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 8-20.
6. GLANZER, M., & ADAMS, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 5-16.
7. GLANZER, M., ADAMS, J. K., IVERSON, G. J., & KIM, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 100, 546-567.
8. GREENE, R. L. (1996). Mirror effect in order and associative information: Role of response strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 687-695.
9. HEIT, E., & JONES, C. M. (1997, March). Two-process models of recognition memory: Recall-to-accept or recall-to-reject? Paper presented at a meeting of the Experimental Psychology Society, Oxford.
10. HINTZMAN, D. L., CAULTON, D. A., & CURRAN, T. (1994). Retrieval constraints and the mirror effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 275-289.
11. HOCKLEY, W. E. (1994). Reflections of the mirror effect for item and associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 22, 713-722.
12. KUČERA, H., & FRANCIS, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence: Brown University Press.
13. LAMING, J., & LAMING, D. (1996). J. Plateau: On the measurement of physical sensations and on the law which links the intensity of these sensations to the intensity of the source. J. Plateau: Report on "Psychological study: Theoretical and experimental research on the measurement of sensations, particularly sensations of light and fatigue" by Mr. Delboeuf. Psychological Research, 59, 134-144.
14. LOGIE, R. H., DELLA SALA, S., LAIACONA, M., CHALMERS, P., & WYNN, V. (1996). Group aggregates and individual reliability: The case of verbal short-term memory. Memory & Cognition, 24, 305-321.
15. MANDLER, G., GOODMAN, G. O., & WILKES-GIBBS, D. L. (1982). The word-frequency paradox in recognition. Memory & Cognition, 10, 33-42.
16. MCCORMACK, P. D., & SWENSON, A. L. (1972). Recognition memory for common and rare words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 95, 72-77.
17. MURRAY, D. J. (1987). A perspective for viewing the integration of probability theory into psychology. In L. Krüger, G. Gigerenzer, & M. S. Morgan (Eds.), The probabilistic revolution: Vol. 2. Ideas in the sciences (pp. 73-100). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. MURRAY, D. J. (1993). A perspective for viewing the history of psychophysics. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 16, 115-186.
19. MURRAY, D. J. (1995). Gestalt psychology and the cognitive revolution. London: Prentice-Hall, Harvester Wheatsheaf.
20. MURRAY, D. J., BIRCH, D. E., CHASE, R. S., EYOLFSON, B. H., & SIMMS, K. A. M. (1991). The effect of vocalization at presentation on short-term recognition of three-digit numbers. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 462-473.
21. MURRAY, D. J., BOUDREAU, N., BURGGRAF, K. K., DOBELL, L., GUGER, S. L., LEASK, A., STANFORD, L., TATE, T. L., & WHEELER, M. (in press). A grouping interpretation of the modality effect in immediate probed recognition. Memory & Cognition.
22. MURRAY, D. J., ROWAN, A. J., & SMITH, K. H. (1988). The effect of articulatory suppression on short-term recognition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 424-436.
23. NEATH, I., & NAIRNE, J. S. (1995). Word-length effects in immediate memory: Overwriting trace decay theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 429-441.
24. POSTMAN, L., & UNDERWOOD, B. J. (1973). Critical issues in interference theory. Memory & Cognition, 1, 19-40.
25. RAO, K. V., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1984). Study-phase processing and the word frequency effect in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 386-394.
26. ROEDIGER, H. L., & MCDERMOTT, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 803-814.
27. SHIFFRIN, R. M., & STEYVERS, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM - Retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 145-166.
28. SNODGRASS, J. G., & CORWIN, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50.
29. VAN ZANDT, T. & RATCLIFF, R. (1995). Statistical mimicking of reaction time data: Single-process models, parameter variability, and mixtures. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 20-54.
30. VOKEY, J. R., & READ, J. D. (1992). Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces. Memory & Cognition, 20, 291-302.
31. WICKELGREN, W. A., & NORMAN, D. A. (1966). Strength models and serial position in short-term memory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 3, 316-347.