Sinusoidal intrathecal infusion for assessment of CSF dynamics in kaolin-induced hydrocephalus

Acta Neurochirurgica

Volumn 140, Issue 10, 1998, Pages 1069-1075

  Brinker, T ^a   Beck, H ^a   Klinge, P ^b   Kischnik, B ^c   Oi, S ^d   Samii, M ^a  

^a NORDSTADT HOSPITAL   (Germany)

^b HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^c SICAN GmbH   (Germany)

^d TOKAI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

CSF dynamics; CSF outflow study; Hydrocephalus; Rats

Indexed keywords

KAOLIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID FLOW; CISTERNA MAGNA; CONTROLLED STUDY; HYDROCEPHALUS; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; INTRATHECAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; TIME;

ANIMALS; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID PRESSURE; COMPLIANCE; HYDROCEPHALUS, NORMAL PRESSURE; INJECTIONS, SPINAL; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; KAOLIN; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY;

EID: 0031793114     PISSN: 00016268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s007010050216     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Balachandra S and Anand S (1993) Intracranial compensatory mechanisms for volume perturbations: a theoretical analysis. Neurol Res 15:204-208
2. Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ (1997) Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study: prediction of outcome after shunting by resistance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid. J Neurosurg 87: 687-693
3. Borgesen SE and Gjerris F (1982) The predictive value of conductance to outflow of CSF in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brain 105:65-86
4. Borgesen SE, Gjerris, F, Sorensen SC (1979) Cerebrospinal fluid conductance and compliance of the craniospinal space in normal-pressure hydrocephalus. A comparison between two methods for measuring conductance to outflow. J Neurosurg 51: 521-525
5. Borgesen SE, Gjerris, F, Srensen SC (1978) The resistance to cerebrospinal fluid absorption in humans. A method of evaluation by lumbo-ventricular perfusion, with particular reference to normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand 57: 88-96
6. Brinker T, Ludemann W, Berens von Rautenfeld D, Samii M (1997) Dynamic properties of lymphatic pathways for the absorption of cerebrospinal fluid. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 94: 493-498
7. Charlton JD, Johnson RN, Pederson NE, Mann JD (1983) Assessment of cerebrospinal fluid compliance and outflow resistance: analysis of steady-state response to sinusoidal input. Ann Biomed Eng 11: 551-561
8. S. Delwel E, De Jong D, Avezaat C (1993) The relative prognostic-value of CSF outflow resistance measurement in shunting for normal hydrocephalus. In: Avezaat C, van Eijndhoven J, Maas A, Tans J (eds) Intracranial pressure VIII. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 816-820
9. Gonzalez-Darder J, Barbera J, Cerda-Nicolas M, Segura D, Broseta J, Barcia-Salorio JL (1984) Sequential morphological and functional changes in kaolin-induced hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 61:918-924
10. Gonzalez-Darder JM, Barcia-Salorio JL, Barbera J, Broseta J (1988) Intraventricular transplantation of omentum for treatment of hydrocephalus. An experimental study in doys. Acta Neurochir [Suppl] (Wien) 43: 159-161
11. Greitz D, Greitz T, Hindmarsh T (1997) A new view on the CSF-circulation with the potential for pharmacological treatment of childhood hydrocephalus [see comments]. Acta Paediatr 86: 125-132
12. Guinane JE (1974) Cerebrospinal fluid resistance and compliance in subacutely hydrocephalic cats. Neurology 24: 138-42
13. Johnson RN, Maffeo CJ, Mann JD, Butler AB, Bass NH (1978) Intracranial pressure regulation: a comparative model of cerebrospinal fluid systems. TIT J Life Sci 8: 79-92
14. Kosteljanetz M, Nehen AM, Kaalund J (1990) Cerebrospinal fluid outflow resistance measurements in the selection of patients for shunt surgery in the normal pressure hydrocephalus syndrome. A controlled trial. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 104: 48-53
15. Mann JD, Butler AB, Rosenthal JE, Maffeo CJ, Johnson RN, Bass NH (1978) Regulation of intracranial pressure in rat, dog, and man. Ann Neurol 3: 156-165
16. Marmarou A, Shulman K, Rosende RM (1978) A nonlinear analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid system and intracranial pressure dynamics. J Neurosurg 48: 332-344
17. Nelson J and Goodman S (1971) An evaluation of the cerebral infusion test for hydrocephalus. Neurology 21: 1037-1053
18. Pawlowski G, Sliwka S, Traczewski W, Kucinski L (1990) The sinusoidal infusion test-an additional filling test for evaluating the mechanisms of the volume-pressure compensation in the intracranial cerebrospianl fluid space. Neurol Neurochir Pol 24: 55-60
19. Sullivan HG, Miller JD, Griffith RLd, Carter W, Jr., Rucker S (1979) Bolous versus steady-state infusion for determination of CSF outflow resistance. Ann Neurol 5: 228-238
20. Tans J (1979) Differentiation of normal pressure hydrocephalus and cerebral atrophy by computed tomography and spinal infusion test. J Neurol 222: 109-118
21. Tans JT and Poortvliet DC (1989) Relationship between compliance and resistance to outflow of CSF in adult hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 71: 59-62
22. Vannesta JA (1994) Three decades of normal pressure hydrocephalus: are we wiser now? [editorial] [see comments]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 57: 1021-1025
23. Vorstrup S, Christensen J, Gjerris F, Sorensen PS, Thomsen AM, Paulson OB (1987) Cerebral blood flow in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus before and after shunting. J Neurosurg 66: 379-387