The physiology of ileo-anal pouch function

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 176, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 384-389

  Levitt, Michael D ^a   Kuan, Melvyn ^a  

^a SIR CHARLES GAIRDNER HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOMATOUS POLYP; ANUS SPHINCTER; BACTERIAL GROWTH; HUMAN; ILEOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; ILEUM POUCH; INTESTINE MOTILITY; MALABSORPTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SMOOTH MUSCLE; ULCERATIVE COLITIS;

EID: 0031789683     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00194-9     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Parks A.G., Nicholls R.J. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. BMJ. 2:1978;85-88.
2. Mikkola K., Luukkonen P., Jarvinen H.J. Long term results of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Int J Colorect Dis. 10:1995;10-14.
3. Becker J.M., McGrath K.M., Meagher M.F., et al. Late functional adaptation after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Surgery. 110:1991;718-724.
4. Becker J.M., Hillard A.E., Mann F.A., et al. Functional assessment after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and endorectal ileoanal pull through. World J Surg. 9:1985;598-605.
5. Hallgren T.A., Fasth S.B., Nordgren S., et al. Manovolumetric characteristics and functional results in three different pelvic pouch designs. Int J Colorect Dis. 4:1989;156-160.
6. Johnston D., Holdsworth P.J., Nasmyth D.G., et al. Preservation of the entire anal canal in conservative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis a pilot study comparing end-to-end ileo-anal anastomosis without mucosal resection with mucosal proctectomy and endo-anal anastomosis . Br J Surg. 74:1987;940-944.
7. Keighley M.R., Yoshioka K., Kmiot W., Heyen F. Physiological parameters influencing function in restorative proctocolectomy and ileo-pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 75:1988;997-1002.
8. Lewis W.G., Miller A.S., Williamson M.E.R., et al. The perfect pelvic pouch - what makes the difference? Gut. 37:1995;552-556.
9. Tuckson W., Lavery I., Fazio V., et al. Manometric and functional comparison of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with and without anal manipulation. Am J Surg. 161:1991;90-94.
10. Oresland T., Fasth S., Nordgren S., et al. Pouch size, the important functional determinant after restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg. 77:1990;265-269.
11. Keighley M.R.B. Abdominal mucosectomy reduces the incidence of soiling and sphincter damage after restorative proctocolectomy and J-pouch. Dis Colon Rectum. 30:1987;386-390.
12. Mikkola K., Luukkonen P., Jarvinen H.J. Long-term results of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Int J Colorect Dis. 10:1995;10-14.
13. Sharp F.R., Bell G.A., Seal A.M., Atkinson K.G. Investigations of the anal sphincter before and after restorative proctocolectomy. Am J Surg. 153:1987;469-472.
14. Hallgren T.A., Fasth S., Oresland T., Hulten L. Ileal pouch anal function after endo anal mucosectomy and handsewn ileoanal anastomosis without mucosectomy. Euro J Surg. 191:1995;915-921.
15. Pricolo V.E., Potenti F.M., Luks F.I. Selective preservation of the anal transition zone in ileoanal pouch procedures. Dis Colon Rectum. 39:1996;871-877.
16. Horgan P.G., O'Connell P.R., Shinkwin C.A., Kirwan W.O. Effect of anterior resection on anal sphincter function. Br J Surg. 76:1989;783-786.
17. Stryker S.J., Philips S.F., Dozois R.R., et al. Anal and neorectal function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg. 203:1986;55-61.
18. Emblem R., Stein R., Morkrid L. Anal sphincter function after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy and ileo anal anastomosis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 24:1989;171-178.
19. Neal D.E., Williams N.S., Johnston D. Rectal, bladder and sexual function after mucosal proctectomy with and without a pelvic reservoir for colitis and polyposis. Br J Surg. 69:1982;599-604.
20. Oresland T., Fasth S., Akervall S., et al. Manovolumetric and sensory characteristics of the ileal J-pouch compared with healthy rectum. Br J Surg. 77:1990;803-806.
21. Heald R.J., Allen D.R. Stapled ileo-anal anastomosis a technique to avoid mucosal proctectomy in the ileal pouch operation . Br J Surg. 73:1986;571-572.
22. Lavery I.C., Tuckson W.B., Easley K.A. Internal anal sphincter function after total abdominal colectomy and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without mucosal proctectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 32:1989;950-953.
23. Becker J.M., LaMorte W., Stmarie G., Ferzoco S. Extent of smooth muscle resection during mucosectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis affects anorectal physiology and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 40:1997;653-660.
24. Kerlin P., Phillips S. Variability of motility in the ileum and jejunum in healthy humans. Gastroenterology. 82:1982;694-700.
25. Quigley E.M.M., Borody T.J., Phillips S.F., et al. Motility of the terminal ileum and ileocecal sphincter in healthy humans. Gastroenterology. 87:1984;857-866.
26. Stryker S.J., Borody T.J., Phillips S.F., et al. Motility of the small intestine after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg. 201:1985;351-356.
27. Chaussade S., Merite F., Hautefeuille M., et al. Motility of the jejunum after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anastomosis. Gut. 30:1989;371-375.
28. Groom S., Kamm M.A., Nicholls R.J. Relationship of small bowel motility and ileoanal reservoir function. Gut. 35:1994;523-529.
29. Akwari O.E., Kelly K.A., Phillips S.F. Myoelectric and motor patterns of continent pouch and conventional ileostomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 150:1980;363-371.
30. Berglund B., Kock N.G., Myrvold N.E. Volume capacity and pressure characteristics of the continent ileostomy reservoir. Scand J Gastroenterol. 19:1984;683-690.
31. Harms B.A., Pahl A.C., Starling J.R. Comparison of clinical and compliance characteristics between S and W ileal reservoirs. Am J Surg. 159:1990;34-40.
32. Levitt M.D., Kamm M.A., Groom J., et al. Ileoanal pouch compliance and motor function. Br J Surg. 79:1992;126-128.
33. O'Connell P.R., Pemberton J.H., Kelly K.A. Motor function of the ileal J pouch and its relation to clinical outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. World J Surg. 11:1987;735-741.
34. Rabau M.Y., Percy J.P., Parks A.G. Ileal pelvic reservoir a correlation between motor patterns and clinical behaviour . Br J Surg. 69:1982;391-395.
35. Taylor B.M., Cranley B., Kelly K.A., et al. A clinico-physiological comparison of ileal pouch-anal and straight ileoanal anastomosis. Ann Surg. 198:1983;462-468.
36. Levitt M.D., Kamm K.A., vander Sijp J.R., Nicholls R.J. Ambulatory pouch and anal motility in patients with ileo-anal reservoirs. Int J Colorect Dis. 9:1994;40-44.
37. Lubowski D.Z., Meagher A.P., Smart R.C., Butler S.P. Scintigraphic assessment of colonic function during defecation. Int J Colorect Dis. 10:1995;91-93.
38. O'Connell P.R., Kelly K.A., Brown M.L. Scintigraphic assessment of neo rectal motor function. J Nuclear Med. 27:1986;460-464.
39. Levitt M.D., Kamm M.A., Nicholls R.J. Pouch dynamics - a simple test of ileo-anal pouch evacuation. Int J Colorect Dis. 6:1991;158-160.
40. Gadacz T.R., Kelly K.A., Phillips S.F. The continent ileal pouch absorptive and motor features . Gastroenterology. 72:1997;1287-1291.
41. Nicholls R.J., Belliveau P., Neill M., et al. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir a pathophysiological assessment . Gut. 22:1981;462-468.
42. Hylander E., Rannem T., Hegnhoj J., Kirkegaard P. Absorption studies after ileal J-pouch anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. A prospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 26:1991;65-72.
43. O'Connell P.R., Rankin D.R., Weiland L.H., Kelly K.A. Enteric bacteriology, absorption, morphology and emptying after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 73:1986;909-914.
44. Sandborn W.J., Tremaine W.J., Batts K.P., et al. Fecal bile acids, short chain fatty acids and bacteria after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis do not differ in patients with pouchitis. Dig Dis Sci. 40:1995;1474-1483.
45. Welkos S.L., Toskes P.P., Baer H., Smith G.W. Importance of anaerobic bacteria in the cobalamin malabsorption of the experimental rat blind loop syndrome. Gastroenterology. 80:1981;313-320.
46. Christl S.U., Shapach W. Metabolic consequences of total colectomy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 32:(suppl 222):1997;20-24.
47. Natori H., Utsunomiya J., Yamamura T., et al. Fecal and stomal bile acid composition after ileostomy or ileoanal anastomosis in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis and adenomatosis coli. Gastroenterology. 102:1992;1278-1288.
48. Salemans J.M., Nagergast F.M., Tangerman A., et al. Postprandial conjugated and unconjugated serum bile acid levels after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 28:1993;786-790.
49. Gracey M., Papadimitriou J., Burke V., et al. Effects on small-intestinal function and structure induced by feeding a deconjugated bile salt. Gut. 14:1973;519-528.
50. Bayat M., Brynskov J., Dige-Petersen H., et al. Direct and quantitative vitamin B12 absorption measurement in patients with disorders of the distal part of the bowel. Comparison of the stool spot test (SST) with whole body counting in patients with ileal pelvic reservoir, ileostomy or Crohn's disease. Int J Colorect Dis. 9:1994;68-72.
51. M'Koma A.E. Follow up results of haematology data before and after restorative proctocolectomy. Clinical outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 37:1994;932-937.
52. M'Koma A.E., Lindquist K., Lijequist L. Biochemical laboratory data in patients before and after restorative proctocolectomy. A study on 83 patients with a follow-up of 36 months. Ann Chirugie. 48:1994;525-534.
53. Cummings J.H. Short chain fatty acids in the human colon. Gut. 22:1981;763-779.
54. Nasmyth D.G., Godwin P.G.R., Dixon M.F., et al. Ileal ecology after pouch-anal anastomosis or ileostomy a study of mucosal morphology, fecal bacteriology, fecal volatile acids and their interrelationship . Gastroenterology. 96:1989;817-824.
55. Frankel W.L., Zhang W., Singh A., et al. Mediation of the trophic effects of short-chain fatty acids on the rat jejunum and colon. Gastroenterology. 106:1994;375-380.
56. Cherbut C., Aube A.C., Blottiere H.M., Galmiche J.P. Effects of short chain fatty acids on gastrointestinal motility. Scand J Gastroenterol. 32:(suppl 222):1997;58-61.
57. Fich A., Phillips S.F., Hakm N.S., et al. Stimulation of ileal emptying by short chain fatty acids. Dig Dis Sci. 34:1989;1516-1520.
58. Kamath P.S., Hoepfner M.T., Phillips S.F. Short chain fatty acids stimulate motility in the canine ileum. Am J Physiol. 253:1987;427-433.
59. Kamath P.S., Phillips S.F., Zinsmeister A.R. Short chain fatty acids stimulate motility in humans. Gastroenterology. 95:1988;146-150.
60. DeSilva HJ, Ireland A, Kettlewell M, et al. Short chain fatty acid irrigation in severe pouchitis. NEJM. 1989;321:1416-1417. Letter.
61. Tonelli F., Dolara P., Batignani G., et al. The effects of short chain fatty acids on mucosal proliferation and inflammation of ileal pouches in patients with ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum. 38:1995;974-978.
62. Ambrose W.L., Pemberton J.H., Phillips S.F., et al. Fecal short-chain fatty acid concentrations and effect on ileal pouch function. Dis Colon Rectum. 36:1993;235-239.
63. Kmiot W.A., O'Brien J.D., Awad R., Keighley M.R. Estimation of small bowel transit time following colectomy and ileal reservoir construction. Br J Surg. 79:1992;697-700.
64. Santavirta J. Lactulose hydrogen and [14c] xylose breath tests in patients with ileo anal anastomosis. Int J Colorect Dis. 6:1991;208-211.
65. Michelasi F., Stella M., Block G.E. Prospective assessment of functional results after ileal J pouch-anal restorative proctocolectomy. Arch Surg. 128:1993;889-895.
66. Nasmyth D.G., Johnston D., Godwin P.G.R., et al. Factors influencing bowel function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 73:1986;469-473.
67. Pemberton J.H., Kelly K.A., Beart B.W. Jr, et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Long term results. Ann Surg. 206:1987;504-513.
68. Nicholls R.J., Pezim M.E. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis a comparison of three reservoir designs . Br J Surg. 72:1985;470-474.
69. Rosemurgy A.S., Schraut W.F., Block G.E. The physiologic effects of ileal reservoirs and efferent conduits complementing ileoanal anastomosis an experimental study in dogs . Surgery. 94:1983;697-703.
70. Becker J.M., Hillard A.E., Mann F.A., et al. Functional assessment after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy and endorectal ileoanal pull through. World J Surg. 9:1985;598-605.
71. Thompson W.H.F., Simpson A.H.R.W., Wheeler J.C. Mathematical prediction of ileal pouch capacity. Br J Surg. 74:1987;567-568.
72. Everett W.G. Experience of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir. Br J Surg. 76:1989;77-81.
73. Harms B.A., Hamilton J.W., Yamamodo D.T., Starling J.R. Quadruple loop (W) ileal pouch reconstruction after proctocolectomy analysis and functional results . Surgery. 102:1987;561-567.
74. Levitt M.D., Cohen L.D., Mahendrarajah K., Gibbs N. A comparison of J and W pouches using an isolated ileal reservoir in pigs. Aust NZ J Surg. 64:1994;488-490.
75. Keighley M.R.B., Yoshioka K., Kmiot W. Prospective randomized trial to compare the stapled double lumen pouch and the sutured quadruple pouch for restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg. 75:1988;1008-1011.
76. Miller A.S., Williamson M.E.R., Lewis W.G., et al. Prospective controlled trial of duplicated (J) versus quadruplicated (W) ileal reservoirs for ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg. 83:(suppl 1):1996;1. Abstract.
77. Beart R.W. Jr, Dozois R.R., Wolff B.G., Pemberton J.H. Mechanisms of rectal continence. Lessons from the ileo-anal procedure. Am J Surg. 149:1985;31-34.
78. Winslet MC, Flinn R, Keighley MRB. Factors influencing the outcome of restorative proctocolectomy. Gut. 1987;28:A1365-A1366. Abstract.