Short-term effectiveness of medial efferents does not predict susceptibility to temporary threshold shift in the guinea pig

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 118, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 681-684

  Zennaro, Olivier ^a   Erre, Jean Paul ^a   Aran, Jean Marie ^a   Dauman, René ^a,b  

^a INSERM   (France)

^b Hospital and University Centre   (France)

Author keywords

Cochlea; Distorsion products; Efferents; Noise induced hearing loss; Temporary threshold shift

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; ATTENUATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; EFFERENT NERVE; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FREQUENCY MODULATION; GUINEA PIG; HEARING LOSS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND INTENSITY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; GUINEA PIGS; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; NEURONS, EFFERENT; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PROGNOSIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0031789480     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016489850183179     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Guinan JJ Jr. Physiology of olivocochlear efferents. In: Dallos P, Popper AN, Fay RF (eds). The cochlea. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996: 435-502.
2. Puel JL, Rebillard G. Effect of contralateral sound stimulation on the distorsion product 2f1-f2: evidence that the medial efferent system is involved. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87: 1630-5.
3. Moulin A, Collet L, Duclaux R. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distorsion products in humans. Is the medial efferent system involved? Hear Res 1993; 65: 193-210.
4. Rajan R. Efferent and priming modulation of noise-induced hearing loss. In: Axelsson A, Borchgrevink H, Hamernick RP, Hellström PA, Henderson D, Salvi RJ, eds. Scientific basis of noise-induced hearing loss. New York: Thieme, 1996: 159-71.
5. Harris FP, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Stagner BB, Coats AC, Martin GK. Acoustic distorsion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitude as a function of f2/f1 ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85: 220-9.
6. Avan P, Bonfils P, Loth D. Effects of acoustic overstimulation on distorsion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. In: Axelsson A, Borchgrevink H, Hamernick RP, Hellström PA, Henderson D, Salvi RJ, eds. Scientific basis of noise-induced hearing loss. New York: Thieme, 1996: 65-81.
7. Brown AM, McDowell B, Forge A. Acoustic distorsion products can be used to monitor the effects of chronic gentamicin treatment. Hear Res 1989; 42: 143-56.
8. Subramaniam M, Salvi RJ, Spongr VP, Henderson D, Powers NL. Changes in distorsion product otoacoustic emissions and outer hair cells following interrupted noise exposures. Hear Res 1994; 74: 204-16.
9. Rajan R. Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on temporary threshold shifts in auditory sensitivity. I. Dependence on electrical stimulation parameters. J Neurophysiol 1988; 60: 549-68.
10. Dancer A, Decory L. Prediction of NIHL based on animal studies: species differences and their implication. In: Vallet, ed. Noise as a public health problem. INRETS, Arcueil, vol. 3, 1993: 128-35.
11. Puel JL, Pujol R. Recent advances in cochlear neurobiology: cochlear efferents and acoustic trauma. In: Vallet M, ed. Noise as a public health problem. Arcueil, France, INRETS, 1993: 136-51.