Population genetic structure of tecate cypress (Cupressaceae)

Southwestern Naturalist

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 363-373

  Truesdale, Harold D ^a   Mcclenaghan Jr , Leroy R ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CUPRESSUS FORBESII;

EID: 0031785222     PISSN: 00384909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. ARMSTRONG, W. P. 1978. Southern California's vanishing cypresses. Fremontia 6:24-29.
2. AYALA, F. J., J. R. POWELL, M. L. TRACY, C. A. MOURAO, AND S. PEREZ-SALAS. 1972. Enzyme variability in the Drosophila willistoni group. IV. Genetic variation in natural populations of Drosophila willistoni. Genetics 70:113-139.
3. BARTEL, J. A. 1996. Cupressaceae. In: Hickman, J. C., editor. The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. Pp. 111-114.
4. BEAUCHAMP, R. M. 1986. A flora of San Diego County, California. Sweetwater River Press, San Diego, California.
5. BROWN, A. H. D. 1979. Enzyme polymorphism in plant populations. Theoretical Population Biology 15:1-42.
6. CHAKARBORTY, R. 1980. Gene diversity analysis in nested, subdivided populations. Genetics 96:721-726.
7. CHELIAK, W. M., J. WANG, AND J. A. PITEL. 1988. Population structure and genic diversity in tamarack, Larix laricina (Du Roi) K. Koch. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 18:1218-1224.
8. CONKLE, M. T. 1986. Electrophoretic analysis of variation in native Monterey cypress (Cupressus macrocarpa Hartw.). In: Elias, T. S., editor. Proceedings for the California Native Plant Society Symposium. Sacramento, California. Pp. 249-256.
9. CONKLE, M. T., P. D. HODGKISS, L. B. NUNNALLY, AND S. C. HUNTER. 1982. Starch gel electrophoresis of conifer seeds: a laboratory manual. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Research Paper, PSW-64:1-18.
10. DUNN, A. T. 1984. A preliminary report on the ecology and management of the Tecate cypress in San Diego County. Descanso District Office, Cleveland National Forest, Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Alpine, California.
11. DUNN, A. T. 1985. The Tecate cypress. Fremontia 13: 3-7.
12. DUNN, A. T. 1986a. Population dynamics of Tecate cypress. In: Elias, T. S., editor. Proceedings for the California Native Plant Society Symposium. Sacramento, California. Pp. 367-376.
13. DUNN, A. T. 1986b. Fire history in San Diego County. Fremontia 14:24-27.
14. ELLSTRAND, N. C. 1992. Gene flow by pollen: implications for plant conservation genetics. Oikos 63: 77-86.
15. FOWLER, D. P., AND F. W. MORRIS. 1977. Genetic diversity in red pine: evidence for low heterozygosity. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 7:341-347.
16. GOTTLIEB, L. D. 1981. Electrophoretic evidence and plant populations. In: Reinhold, L., J. B. Harborne, and T. Swain, editors. Progress in phytochemistry Vol. 7. Pergamon, Oxford, United Kingdom. Pp. 1-46.
17. GOVINDARAJU, D. R. 1989. Estimates of gene flow in forest trees. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 37:345-357.
18. GRIFFIN, J. R., AND W. B. CRITCHFIELD. 1972. The distribution of forest trees in California. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Research Paper PSW-82.
19. GURIES, R. P., AND F. T. LEDIG. 1982. Genetic diversity and population structure in Pitch pine (Pinus rigida Mill.). Evolution 36:387-402.
20. HAMRICK, J. L. 1982. Plant population genetics and evolution. American Journal of Botany 69:1685-1693.
21. HAMRICK, J. L., AND M. J. W. GODT. 1996. Conservation genetics of endemic plants. In: Avise, J. C., and J. L. Hamrick, editors. Conservation genetics: case histories from nature. Chapman and Hall, New York. Pp. 281-304.
22. HAMRICK, J. L., AND M. D. LOVELESS. 1986. The influence of seed dispersal mechanisms on the genetic structure of plant populations. In: Estrada, A., and T. H. Fleming, editors. Frugivores and seed dispersal. Junk, The Hague, The Netherlands. Pp. 211-223.
23. HAMRICK, J. L., M. J. W. GODT, AND S. L. SHERMAN-BROYLES. 1992. Factors influenceing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New Forests 5:95-124.
24. HAMRICK, J. L., Y. B. LINHART, AND J. B. MITTON. 1979. Relationships between life history characteristics and electrophoretically detectable variation in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10:173-200.
25. HAMRICK, J. L., J. B. MITTON, AND Y. B. LINHART. 1981. Levels of genetic variation in trees: influence of life history characteristics. In: Conkle, M. T., editor. Isozymes of North American forest trees and forest insects. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experimental Station, Berkeley, California. Pp. 35-41.
26. KELLEY, W. A., AND R. P. ADAMS. 1977. Preparation of extracts from Juniper leaves for electrophoresis. Phytochemistry 16:513-516.
27. KIMURA, M. 1983. The neutral theory of evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
28. KRUCKEBERG, A. R. 1984. California serpentines: flora, vegetation, geology, soils and management. University of California Publications in Botany Vol. 78, University of California Press, Berkeley.
29. LEVIN, D. A., AND H. W. KERSTER. 1971. Neighborhood structure in plants under diverse reproductive methods. American Naturalist 105:345-354.
30. LOVELESS, M. D., AND J. L. HAMRICK. 1984. Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15:65-95.
31. MANLY, B. F. J. 1991. Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in biology. Chapman and Hall, London, United Kingdom.
32. MANTEL, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27:209-220.
33. MILLAR, C. I., S. H. STRAUSS, M. T. CONKLE, AND R. D. WESTFALL. 1988. Allozyme differentiation and biosystematics of the California closed-cone pines (Pinus subsect. Oocarpae). Systematic Botany 13: 351-370.
34. MINNICH, R. A. 1983. Fire mosaics in southern California and northern Baja California. Science 219: 1287-1294.
35. MITTON, J. B. 1983. Conifers. In: Tanksley, S. D., and T. J. Orton, editors. Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding, Part B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Pp. 295-328.
36. MITTON, J. B., AND M. C. GRANT. 1984. Associations among protein heterozygosity growth rate, and developmental homeostasis. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15:429-499.
37. NEI, M. T. 1977. F-statistics and analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Annals of Human Genetics 41:225-233.
38. NEI, M. T. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583-590.
39. NEI, M. T., T. MARUYAMA, AND R. CHAKRABORTY. 1975. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29:1-10.
40. NOREEN, E. W. 1989. Computer-intensive methods for testing hypotheses: an introduction. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
41. PLESSAS, M. E., AND S. H. STRAUSS. 1986. Allozyme differentiation among populations, stands, and cohorts in Monterey pine. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 16:791-798.
42. SARGENT, C. S. 1965. Manual of the trees of North America (exclusive of Mexico) Vol 1. Dover Publishing, Inc., New York.
43. SCHOEN, D. J. 1982. Genetic variation and the breeding system of Gilia achilleifolia. Evolution 36:361-370.
44. SELANDER, R. K. 1976. Genic variation in natural populations. In: Ayala, F. J., editor. Molecular evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. Pp. 32-45.
45. SELANDER, R. K., M. H. SMITH, S. Y. YANG, W. E. JOHNSON, AND J. B. GENTRY. 1971. Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the genus Peromyscus I. Variation in the old-field mouse (Peromyscus polionotus). Studies in Genetics VI, University of Texas Publication, 7103:49-90.
46. SHEA, K. L. 1987. Effects of population structure and cone production on outcrossing rates in Englemann spruce and subalpine fir. Evolution 41: 124-136.
47. SLATKIN, M. 1987. Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236: 787-792.
48. SLATKIN, M. 1994. Gene flow and population structure. In: Real, L. A., editor. Ecological genetics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. Pp. 3-17.
49. SMOUSE, P. E., J. C. LONG, AND R. R. SOKAL. 1986. Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Systematic Zoology 35:627-632.
50. SOKAL, R. R., AND F. J. ROHLF. 1981. Biometry. Second ed. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, California.
51. SPRENGER, C. 1986. The northernmost Tecate cypress. Fremontia 4:8-11.
52. SWOFFORD, D. L., AND R. B. SELANDER. 1981. BIOSYS-1. A computer program for the analysis of allelic variation in genetics. Release 1. Urbana: University of Illinois.
53. TEMPLETON, A. R. 1980. Modes of speciation and inferences based on genetic distances. Evolution 34:719-729.
54. VAN DIJK, H., K. WOLFF, AND A. DE VRIES. 1988. Genetic variability in Plantago species in relation to their ecology. 3. Structure of populations of P. major, P. lanceolata and P. coronopus. Theoretical Applied Genetics 75:518-528.
55. VOGL, R. J., W. P. ARMSTRONG, K. L. WHITE, AND K. L. COLE. 1977. The closed-cone pines and cypresses. In: Barbour, M., and J. Majors, editors. Terrestrial vegetation of California. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Pp. 295-358.
56. WATT, W. B. 1985. Bioenergetics and evolutionary genetics: opportunities for new synthesis. American Naturalist 125:118-143.
57. WOLF, C. B. 1948. Taxonomic and distributional studies of the New World Cypresses. El Aliso 1:1-250.
58. WHEELER, N. C., AND R. P. GURIES. 1982. Population structure, genic diversity, and morphological variation in Pinus contorta Dougl. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 12:595-606.
59. WHEELER, N. C., R. P. GURIES, AND D. M. O'MALLEY. 1983. Biosystematics of the genus Pinus, Subsection Contortae. Biochemical Systematic Ecology 11:333-340.
60. WRIGHT, S. 1951. The genetical structure of populations. Annuals of Eugenics 15:323-354.
61. WRIGHT, S. 1965. The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 9:395-420.
62. YEH, F. C., AND J. T. ARNOTT. 1986. Electrophoretic and morphological differentiation of Picea sitchensis, Picea glauca, and their hybrids. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 16:791-798.
63. YEH, F. C., AND D. O. O'MALLEY. 1980. Enzyme variations in natural populations of Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco, from British Columbia. 1. Genetic variation in coastal populations. Silvae Genetica 29:3-4.
64. ZEDLER, P. H. 1981. Vegetation change in chaparrel and desert communities in San Diego County, California. In: West, D. C., H. H. Shugart, and D. B. Botkin, editors. Forest succession. Springer Verlag, New York. Pp. 406-430.
65. ZEDLER, P. H. 1986. Closed cone conifers of the chaparrel. Fremontia 14(3):14-17.
66. ZEDLER, P. H., C. R. GAUTIER, AND P. JACKS. 1984. Edaphic restriction of Cupressus forbesii (Tecate cypress) in southern California, U.S.A. A hypothesis. In: Margaris, N. S., M. Arianoustou-farragitaki, and W. C. Oechel, editors. Being alive on the land. Tasks for vegetation science, Vol. 13. Junk, The Hague, The Netherlands. Pp. 237-243.
67. ZOUROS, E. W., AND D. FOLTZ. 1987. The use of allelic isozyme variation for the study of heterosis. In: Rattazzi, M. C., J. G. Scandalios, and G. S. Whitt, editors. Current Topics in Biological and Medical Research, Vol. 13. Alan R. Liss, New York.