Variation in the feeding of 0+ cyprinid fish in a regulated river: Mesohabitat scale effects

Folia Zoologica

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 61-64

  Garner, Paul ^a  

^a FRESHWATER BIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cover; Cyprinidae; Diet; Electric fishing; Point sampling

Indexed keywords

DIET; PREY SELECTION; STOMACH CONTENT;

UK, ENGLAND, GREAT OUSE RIVER;

ABRAMIS BRAMA; ALBURNUS ALBURNUS; GOBIO GOBIO; LEUCUSCUS CEPHALUS; RUTILUS RUTILUS;

EID: 0031782510     PISSN: 01397893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. BASS, J. A. B., LEACH, D. & PINDER, L. C V., 1947: Temporal and spatial variation in zooplankton in the River Great Oust, an ephemeral food resource for larval and juvenile fish. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management., 13: 245-258.
2. COPR, G. H., 1992: An empirical model for predicting microhabitat of 0+ juvenile fishes in a lowland river catchment. Oecologia. 91: 338-345.
3. COPP, G. H. & GARNER, P., 1995: Evaluating the microhabitat use of freshwater fish larvae and juveniles with point abundance sampling by electrofishing. Folia Zool., 44: 145-158.
4. COPP, G. H. & KOVÁČ, V., 1996: When do fish with indirect development become juveniles ? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 53: 746-752.
5. DOWNING, J. A., PERUSSE, M. & FRENETTE, Y., 1987: Effect of interreplicate variance on Zooplankton sampling design and data analysis. Limnology & Oceanography. 32: 673-680.
6. GARNER, P., 1996: Microhabitat use and diet of 0+ cyprinid fishes in a lentic, regulated reach of the River Great Ouse, UK. J. Fish. Biol., 48: 367-382.
7. GARNER, P., BASS, J. A. B. & COLLETT, G. D., 1996. The effects of weed cutting upon the biota of a large regulated river. Aquatic Conservation. 6: 21-30.
8. HOFER, R. & UDDIN, N., 1985: Digestive processes during the development of the roach, Rutilus rutilus (L.). J. Fish. Biol., 26: 683-689.
9. MANN. R. H. K., BASS, J. A B., LEACH, D. & PINDER, L. C. V., 1997: Temporal and spatial variations in the diet of 0 group roach (Rutilus rutilus) larvae and juveniles in the River Great Ouse in relation to prey availability. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 13: 287-294.
10. MAY, R. M., 1979: The structure and dynamics of ecological communities. In: Anderson, R. M., Turner B. D. & Taylor, L. R. (eds.). Population Dynamics. Blackwell Scientific Publ., Oxford: 385-407.
11. SCHIEMER, F. & WAIDBACHER, H., 1992: Strategies for the Conservation of a Danubian Fish Fauna. In: Boon, P. J., Calow, P. & Petts, G. E. (eds.), River Conservation and Management. Wiley, Chichester, U.K: 363-382.
12. SCOTT, A., 1987: Prey selection by juvenile cyprinids from running water. Journal of Freshwater Biology, 17: 129-742.
13. WIESER, W., 1991: Limitations of energy acquisition and energy use in small poikilotherms: evolutionary implications. Functional Ecology, 5: 234-240.
14. WINFIELD, I. J., 1986: The influence of simulated aquatic macrophytes on the Zooplankton consumption rate of juvenile roach Rutilus rutilus, rudd Scardinius erythrophthalmus and perch Perca fluviatilis. J. Fish. Biol., 29: 37-48.