Comparison between two devices for measuring hip joint motions

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 497-505

  Bierma Zeinstra, S M A ^a   Bohnen, A M ^a   Ramlal, R ^a   Ridderikhoff, J ^a   Verhaar, J A N ^a   Prins, A ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; ELECTRONICS; FEMALE; GONIOMETRY; HIP; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JOINT MOBILITY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; SITTING; SUPINE POSITION;

EID: 0031782014     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/026921598677459668     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Altman R, Alarcon G, Appelrouth D et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for classification and reporting of osteoarthrosis of the hip. Arthritis Rheum 1991; 34: 505-14.
2. Lequesne M. La coxarthrose: critères de diagnostic; etiologie sur 200 cas; role de la dysplasie congenitale. In: Peyron JG ed. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Paris: Ciba-Geigy, 1980.
3. Lea RD, Gerhardt JJ. Current concept review. Range-of-motion measurements. J Bone Joint Surg 1995; 77-A: 784-98.
4. Ellis MI, Stowe J. The hip. Clin Rheum Dis 1982; 8: 655-75.
5. Adams MA, Dolan P, Marx C, Hutton WC. An electronic inclinometer technique for measuring lumbar curvature. Clin Biomech 1986; 1: 130-34.
6. Mayer TG, McClean TJ, Ericksson RP, Offord KP. Use of noninvasive techniques for quantification of spinal range of motion in normal subjects and chronic low-back dysfunction patients. Spine 1984; 9: 588-95.
7. Keeley J, Mayer TG, Cox R, Gatchel RJ, Smith J, Mooney V. Quantification of lumbar function. Part 5: Reliability of range of motion measures in the sagittal plane and an in vivo torso rotation measurement technique. Spine 1986; 11: 31-35.
8. Clarke GR, Willis LA, Fish WW, Nichols PJ. Assessment of movement at the glenohumeral joint. Orthopaedics (Oxford) 1974: 55-71.
9. Petherick M, Rhenault W, Kimble S, Lechner C, Senar V. Concurrent validity and intertester reliability of universal and fluid-based goniometers for active elbow range of motion. Phys Ther 1988; 68: 966-69.
10. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Joint motion: method of measuring and recording. Chicago: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1965.
11. Boone DC, Azen SP. Normal range of motion of joints in male subjects. J Bone Joint Surg 1979; 61-A: 756-59.
12. James B, Parker AW. Active and passive mobility of lower limb joints in elderly men and women. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1989; 68: 162-67.
13. Roach KE, Miles TP. Normal hip and knee active range of motion: the relationship to age. Phys Ther 1991: 71: 656-65.
14. Svenningsen S, Terjesen T, Auflem M, Berg V. Hip motion related to age and sex. Acta Orthop Scand 1989; 60: 97-100.
15. Walker JM, Sue D, Miles-Elkousy N, Ford G, Trevelyan H. Active mobility of the extremities in older subjects. Phys Ther 1984; 64: 919-23.
16. Gajdosik RL, Bohannon RW. Clinical measurement of range of motion. Review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity. Phys Ther 1987; 67: 1867-72.
17. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-10.
18. Bellamy N. Musculoskeletal clinical metrology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1993
19. Bovens AM, Baak van MA, Vrencken JG, Wijnen JA, Verstappen FT. Variability and reliability of joint measurements. Am J Sports Med 1990; 18: 58-63.
20. Ekstrand J, Wiktorsson M, Oberg B, Gillquist J. Lower extremity goniometric measurements: a study to determine their reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982; 63: 171-75.
21. Youdas JW, Bogard CL, Suman VJ. Reliability of goniometric measurements and visual estimates of ankle joint active range of motion obtained in a clinical setting. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 1113-18.