Comparing correlated areas under the ROC curves of two diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias

Biometrics

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 453-470

  Zhou, Xiao Hua ^a,b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b REGENSTRIEF INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Areas under the ROC curve; Diagnostic tests; EM; Likelihood; Missing data; Verification bias

Indexed keywords

MEDICAL IMAGING;

AREA UNDER THE RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVE; DIAGNOSTIC TESTS; EM; LIKELIHOOD; MISSING AT RANDOMS; MISSING DATA; PAIRED DESIGN; RELATIVE ACCURACY; VERIFICATION BIAS;

DIAGNOSIS;

ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS CANCER;

EID: 0031777126     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3109755     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical Data Analysis. New York: John Wiley.
2. Baker, S. G. (1995). Evaluating multiple diagnostic tests with partial verification. Biometrics 51, 330-337.
3. Baker, S. G. and Laird, N. M. (1988). Regression analysis for categorical variables with outcome subject to non-ignorable nonresponse. Journal of American Statistical Association 83, 62-69.
4. Bamber, D. (1975). The area above ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristics graph. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 12, 387-415.
5. Begg, C. B. (1987). Biases in the assessment of diagnostic tests. Statistics in Medicine 6, 411-423.
6. Campbell, G. (1994). Advances in statistical methodology for evaluation of diagnostic and laboratory tests. Statistics in Medicine 13, 499-508.
7. DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M., and Clarke-Pearson, D. L. (1988). Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44, 837-845.
8. Gray, R., Begg, C. B., and Greenes, R. A. (1984). Construction of receiver operating characteristic curves when disease verification is subject to selection bias. Medical Decision Making 4, 151-164.
9. Hanley, J. A. and McNeil, B. J. (1983). A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 143, 29-36.
10. Ibrahim, J. G. and Lipsitz, S. R. (1996). Parameter estimation from incomplete data in binomial regression when the missing-data mechanism is non-ignorable. Biometrics 52, 1071-1078.
11. Little, R. J. A. and Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: John Wiley.
12. Megibow, A. J., Zhou, X. H., Rotterdam, H., et. al. (1995). Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CT versus MR imaging in evaluation of respectability. Radiology 195, 327-332.
13. Metz, C. E. (1978). Basic principles of ROC analysis. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 8, 283-298.
14. Metz, C. E., Kronman, H., Shen, J., and Wang, P. (1984). A new approach for testing the significance of differences between ROC curves measured from correlated data. In Information Processing in Medical Imaging: Proceeding of the Eighth Conference, F. Deconick (ed), 432-445. The Hague: Martinus Nyhoff.
15. Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika 63, 581-592.
16. Rubin, D. B., Stern, H. S., and Vehovar, V. (1995). Handling "don't know" survey responses: The case of Solvenian plebiscite. Journal of the American Statistical Society 90, 822-828.
17. SAS Institute. (1990a). SAS/STAT User's Guide, Volume 1, Version 6, 4th edition. Gary, North Carolina: SAS Institute.
18. SAS Institute. (1990b). SAS/STAT User's Guide, Volume 2, Version 6, 4th edition. Gary, North Carolina: SAS Institute.
19. Toledano, A. Y. (1993). Generalized estimating equations for repeated ordinal categorical data, with application to diagnostic medicine. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston.
20. Zhou, X. H. (1996). A nonparametric ML estimate of a ROC curve area corrected for verification bias. Biometrics 52, 310-316.