Comparison of four different antibiotics as prophylaxis in caesarean section

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 546-547

  Bilgin, T ^a   Ozan, H ^a   Dirgen, A ^a   Esmer, A ^a  

^a ULUDAG UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMIKACIN; ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; CEFTRIAXONE; CLINDAMYCIN; MEZLOCILLIN; SULTAMICILLIN;

ADULT; ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 0031775718     PISSN: 01443615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01443619866309     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Gordon H. R., Phelps D. and Blanchard K. (1979) Prophylactic cesarean section antibiotics: maternal and neonatal morbidity before or after cord clamping. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 53, 151-156.
2. Periti P., Mazzei T., Lamanna S. and Mini E. (1984) Single-dose ceftriaxone versus multidose cefotaxime prophylaxis in gynecologic and obstetrical surgery. Preliminary results of a multicenter prospective randomized study. Chemioterapia, 3, 299-304.
3. Polk H. C., Trachtenberg L. and Finn M. P. (1980) Antibiotic activity in surgical incisions: the basis for prophylaxis in selected operation. Journal of the American Medical Association, 244, 1353-1354.