Telepresence

Human Factors

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 354-375

  Draper, John V ^a,c   Kaber, David B ^b,d,e   Usher, John M ^b,f,g  

^a OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^d Process Systems Division ^*

^e TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CYBERNETICS; MACHINE; REMOTE SENSING; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0031773280     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/001872098779591386     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (AGARD). (1980). Fidelity of simulation for pilot training (AGARD-AR-159). Neuilly-sur-Seine, France: Author.
2. Akin, D. L., Minsky, M. L., Thiel, E. D., & Kurtzman, C. R. (1983). Space applications of automation, robotics, and machine intelligence systems (ARAMIS) Phase II, Volume 3: Executive summary (Tech. Report NASA-CR-3736). Huntsville, AL: NASA, Marshall Space Flight Center.
3. Barfield, W., Rosenberg, C., & Kraft, C. (1990). Relationship between scene complexity and perceptual performance for computer graphics simulations. Displays and Technology Applications, 11, 179-185.
4. Biocca, F, & Delaney, B. (1995). Immersive virtual reality technology. In F. Biocca & M. R. Levy (Eds.), Communication in the age of virtual reality (pp. 57-124). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Corliss, W. R., & Johnsen, E. G. (1968). Teleoperator controls: An AEC-NASA technology survey (Tech. Report NASA-SP-5070). Washington, DC: NASA.
6. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 815-822.
8. Draper, J. V. (1995). Teleoperators for advanced manufacturing: Applications and human factors challenges. International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, 5, 53-85.
9. Draper, J. V., & Blair, L. M. (1996). Workload, flow, and telepresence during teleoperation. In Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Vol. 2, pp. 1030-1035). New York: IEEE Robotics and Automation Society.
10. Durlach, N. I., & Mavor, A. S. (Eds.). (1995). Virtual reality: Scientific and technological challenges. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press.
11. Endsley, M. R. (1988). Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 97-101). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
12. Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32-64.
13. Fischer, P., Daniel, R., & Siva, K. V. (1990). Specification and design of input devices for teleoperation. In Proceedings of the 1990 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 540-545). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Computer Society.
14. Fontaine, G. (1992). The experience of a sense of presence in intercultural and international encounters. Presence, 1, 482-490.
15. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
16. Goertz, R. C. (1963). Manipulators used for handling radioactive materials. In E. Bennett, J. Degan, & J. Spiegel (Eds.), Human factors in technology (pp. 425-443). New York: McGraw-Hill.
17. Held, R. M., & Durlach, N. I. (1992). Telepresence. Presence, 1, 109-112.
18. Hendrix, C., & Barfield, W. (1995). Presence in virtual environments as a function of visual and auditory cues. In Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium '95 (pp. 74-82). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Computer Society.
19. Hendrix, C., & Barfield, W. (1996). Presence within virtual environments as a function of visual display parameters. Presence, 5, 274-289.
20. Jackson, S. A., & Roberts, G. C. (1992). Positive performance states of athletes: Toward a conceptual understanding of peak performance. Sport Psychologist, 6, 156-171.
21. Jansen, J. F., & Kress, R. L. (1996). Hydraulically powered dissimilar teleoperated system controller design. In Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 2484-2491). New York: IEEE Robotics and Automation Society.
22. Johnsen, E. G., & Corliss, W. R. (1971). Human factors applications in teleoperator design and operation. New York: WileyInterscience.
23. Kaber, D. B., Macedo, J. A., & Endsley, M. R. (1996). Human factors investigation of automated compensation for incongruent display and control axes in teleoperations: Part II. Dynamic misalignments. In R. Koubek & W. Karwowski (Eds.), Manufacturing agility and hybrid automation - I (pp. 473-477). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
24. Kruk, R. V., Runnings, D. W., McKinnon, G. M., & Lippay, A. L. (1985). Simulation fidelity. Is it real or is it virtual? In Proceedings of the Human Factors Association of Canada 18th Annual Meeting (pp. 115-118). Rexdale, Ontario, Canada: Human Factors Association of Canada.
25. Lintern, G., Sheppard, D. J., Parker, D. L., Yates, K. E., & Nolan, M. D. (1989). Simulator design and instructional features for air-to-ground attack: A transfer study. Human Factors, 31, 87-99.
26. Loomis, J. M. (1992). Distal attribution and presence. Presence, 1, 113-119.
27. Lumelsky, V. (1991). On human performance in telerobotics. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 21, 971-982.
28. Massimino, M. J., & Sheridan, T. B. (1993). Sensory substitution for force feedback in teleoperation. In H. G. Stassen (Ed.), Analysis, design, and evaluation of man-machine systems 1992 (pp. 109-114). Oxford: Pergamon.
29. Milgram, P., Yin, S., & Grodski, J. J. (1997). An augmented reality based teleoperation interface for unstructured environments. In Proceedings of the ANS 7th Topical Meeting on Robotics and Remote Systems (pp. 966-973). LaGrange Park, IL: American Nuclear Society.
30. Minsky, M. (1980, June). Telepresence. Omni, 45-51.
31. Mühlbach, L., Böcker, M., & Prussog, A. (1995). Telepresence in videocommunications: A study on stereoscopy and individual eye contact. Human Factors, 37, 290-305.
32. Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human information-processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214-255.
33. Nemire, K., Jacoby, R. H., & Ellis, S. R. (1994). Simulation fidelity of a virtual environment display. Human Factors, 36, 79-93.
34. Pepper, R. L., & Cole, R. E. (1978). Display system variables affecting operator performance in undersea vehicles and work systems (Report NOSC TR-269). San Diego, CA: Naval Ocean Systems Center.
35. Price, D., & Barrell, J. (1980). An experiential approach with quantitative methods: A research paradigm, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 20, 75-95.
36. Privette, G. (1983). Peak experience, peak performance, and flow: A comparative analysis of positive human experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1361-1368.
37. Privette, G., & Bundrick, C. M. (1987). Measurement of experience: Construct and content validity of the experience questionnaire. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 65, 315-332.
38. Psotka, J., & Davison, S. (1993). Cognitive factors associated with immersion in virtual environments. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute.
39. Rosenberg, L, B. (1993a). The effect of interocular distance upon operator performance using stereoscopic displays to perform virtual depth tasks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Annual Symposium '93 (pp. 27-32). Piscataway. NJ: IEEE Computer Society.
40. Rosenberg, L. B. (1993b). Virtual fixtures as tools to enhance operator performance in telepresence environments. In W. S. Kim (Ed.), Telemanipulator technology and space telerobotics (pp. 10-21). Bellingham, WA: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
41. Rosenberg, L. B. (1993c). Virtual fixtures: Perceptual tools for telerobotic manipulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Annual Symposium '93 (pp. 76-80). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Computer Society.
42. Sato, K., Kimura, M., & Abe, A. (1992). Intelligent manipulator system with nonsymmetric and redundant master-slave. Journal of Robotic Systems, 9, 281-290.
43. Schloerb, D. W. (1995). A quantitative measure of telepresence. Presence, 4, 64-80.
44. Sheridan, T. B. (1988). Teleoperation scorecard: Deja vu and really new. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Teleoperation and Control (pp. 3-9). Bristol, England: IFS.
45. Sheridan, T. B. (1992a). Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence, 1, 120-126.
46. Sheridan, T. B. (1992b). Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Sheridan, T. B. (1996). Further musings on the psychophysics of presence. Presence, 5, 241-246.
48. Sheridan, T. B., Kruser, D. S., & Deutsch, S. (Eds.). (1987). Human Factors in Automated and Robotic Space Systems: Proceedings of a Symposium. Washington, DC: National Research Council, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on Human Factors.
49. Singer, M. J., Witmer, B. G., & Bailey, J. H. (1994). Development of "presence" measures for virtual environments. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting (p. 983). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
50. Slater, M., & Usoh, M. (1993). Representation systems, perceptual position, and presence in immersive virtual environments. Presence, 2, 221-233.
51. Slater, M., Usoh, M., & Steed, A. (1994). Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence, 3, 130-144.
52. Smets, G. J. F., & Overbeeke, K. J. (1995). Visual resolution and spatial performance: The trade-off between resolution and interactivity. In Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium '95 (pp. 67-73). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Computer Society.
53. Smith, K. U. (1972). Cybernetic psychology. In R. N. Singer (Ed.), The psychomotor domain (pp. 285-348). New York: Lea and Febiger.
54. Smith, K. U., & Smith, W. M. (1962). Perception and motion: An analysis of space-structured behavior. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
55. Smith, T. J., Henning, R. A., & Smith, K. U. (1995). Performance of hybrid automated systems - A social cybernetic analysis. International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, 5, 29-51.
56. Smith, T. J., Keran, C. M., Koehler, E. J., & Mathison, P. K. (1995). Teleoperation of mobile equipment - A behavioral cybernetic analysis. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Environmental Systems (pp. 1-20). San Diego, CA: SAE International.
57. Smith, T. J., & Smith, K. U. (1987). Feedback-control mechanisms of human behavior. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors (pp. 251-293). New York: Wiley.
58. Smith, T. J., & Smith, K. U. (1988). The social cybernetics of human interaction with automated systems. In W. Karwowski, H. R. Parsaei, & M. R. Wilhelm (Eds.), Ergonomics of hybrid automated systems I (pp. 691-711). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
59. Smith, T. J., & Smith, K. U. (1989). The human factors of workstation telepresence. In S. Griffin (Ed.), Third annual workshop on space operations automation and robotics (Tech. Report NASA Conference Publication 3059, pp. 235-250). Houston, TX: NASA, Johnson Space Flight Center.
60. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communications, 42, 73-93.
61. Taylor, R., & Rushton, S. (1993). The psychology of "immersion" in virtual worlds. Intermedia, 21(3), 40-41.
62. Travis, D., Watson, T, & Atyeo, M. (1994). Human psychology in virtual environments. In L. MacDonald & J. Vince (Eds.), Interacting with virtual environments (pp. 43-59). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
63. Vertut, J., & Coiffet, P. (1985). Teleoperation and robotics: applications and technology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
64. Vertut, J., Fournier, R., Espiau, B., & Andre, G. (1985). Sensoraided and/or computer-aided bilateral teleoperator system (SCATS). In A. Morecki, G. Blanchi, & K. Kedzior (Eds.), Theory and practice of robots and manipulators, Proceedings of the RoManSy '84: The Fifth CISM-IFToMM Symposium (pp. 281-292). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65. Wickens, C. D. (1980). The structure of attentional resources. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 239-257). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. Wickens, C., Derrick, W., Berringer, D., & Micalizzi, J. (1980). The structure of processing resources: Implications for task configuration and workload. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 24th Annual Meeting (pp. 253-256). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
67. Wickens, C. D., Sandry, D. L., & Vidulich, M. (1983). Compatibility and resource competition between modalities of input, central processing, and output. Human Factors, 25, 227-248.
68. Wickens, C. D., Sandry, D. L., Vidulich, M., & Schiflett, S. (1981). Factors affecting the performance advantage of speech technology. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting (pp. 705-709). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
69. Williams, H. P., Wickens, C. D., & Hutchinson, S. (1994). Fidelity and interactivity in navigational training: A comparison of three methods. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting (pp. 1163-1167). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
70. Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1994). Measuring immersion in virtual environments (Tech. Report 1014). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
71. Zeltzer, D. (1992). Autonomy, interaction, and presence. Presence, 1, 127-132.
72. Zhai, S., & Milgram, P. (1992). Human-robot synergism and virtual telerobotic control. In The economics of ergonomics: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Association of Canada (pp. 201-206). Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: Human Factors Association of Canada.