Impact of reorientation algorithms on quantitative myocardial SPECT perfusion imaging

Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Volumn 39, Issue 11, 1998, Pages 1864-1869

  Haddad, Mojgan ^a   Porenta, Gerold ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Image reorientation; Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy; Quantitative image analysis; SPECT image processing

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 0031773112     PISSN: 01615505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Garcia E, Van Train K, Maddahi J, et al. Quantification of rotational thallium-201 myocardial tomography. J Nucl Med 1985;26:17-26.
2. DePasquale E, Nody A, DePuey E, et al. Quantitative rotational thallium-201 tomography for identifying and localizing coronary artery disease. Circulation 1988;77:316-327.
3. Maddahi J, Train KV, Prigent F, et al. Quantitative single photon emission computed thallium-201 tomography for detection and localization of coronary artery disease: optimization and prospective validation of a new technique. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;14:1689-1699.
4. Van Train KF, Maddahi J, Berman DS, et al. Quantitative analysis of tomographic stress thallium-201 myocardial scintigrams: a multicenter trial. J Nucl Med 1990;31: 1168-1179.
5. ACC, AHA and SNM. Standardization of cardiac tomographic imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 1992;1:117-119.
6. O'Brien A, Gremmell H. Effectiveness of oblique section display in thallium-201 myocardial tomography. Nucl Med Commun 1986;7:609-616.
7. Metz C, Beck R. Quantitative effects of stationary linear image processing on noise and resolution of structure in radionuclide images. J Nucl Med 1975;15:164-170.
8. Carter W. Image sampling and interpolation. SPIE 1983;397:477-486.
9. King M, Schwinger R, Doherty P. Two-dimensional filtering of SPECT images using the Metz and Wiener filters. J Nucl Med 1984;25:1234-1240.
10. King MA, Glick SJ, Penney BC, Schwinger RB, Doherty PW. Interactive visual optimization of SPECT prereconstruction filtering. J Nucl Med 1987;28:1192-1198.
11. Shafer R, Rabiner L. A digital signal processing approach to interpolation. Proc IEEE 1973;61:692-702.
12. Maeland E. On the comparison of interpolation methods. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1988;7:213-217.
13. Kuhle W, Porenta G, Huang H, Phelps M, Schelbert H. Issues in the quantitation of reoriented cardiac PET images. J Nucl Med 1992;33:1235-1242.
14. Keys R. Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing. IEEE Trans Acoust, Speech, Signal Processing 1981;29:1153-1160.