Lessons from the past: reassessing the interwar disciplinary history of international relations

International Studies Quarterly

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 433-459

  Schmidt, Brian C ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GEOPOLITICS; INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS; POLITICAL DISCOURSE;

EID: 0031767799     PISSN: 00208833     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0020-8833.00091     Document Type: Article

References (137)

1. ALKER, H., AND T. BIERSTEKER (1984) The Dialectics of World Order: Notes for a Future Archeologist of International Savoir Faire. International Studies Quarterly 28:121-142.
2. AUSTIN, J. (1954) The Providence of Jurisprudence Determined and the Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence. New York: Noonday Press.
3. BALDWIN, D. (1993) "Neoliberalism, Neorealism, and World Politics." In Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, edited by D. Baldwin, pp. 3-25. New York: Columbia University Press.
4. BALDWIN, D. (1995) Security Studies and the End of the Cold War. World Politics 48:117-141.
5. BANKS, M. (1986) "The International Relations Discipline: Asset or Liability for Conflict Resolution?" In International Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice, edited by E. Azar and J. Burton, pp. 5-27. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
6. BARTELSON, J. (1995) A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. BENTLEY, A. (1908) The Process of Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. BIERSTEKER, T., AND C. WEBER (1996) State Sovereignty as Social Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. BLUNTSCHLI, J. C. (1880) "Lieber's Service to Political Science and International Law." In Miscellaneous Writings, Vol. II, edited by F. Lieber, pp. 7-14. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
10. BLUNTSCHLI, J. C. (1921) The Theory of the State, 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11. BOOTH, K. (1991) Security in Anarchy: Utopian Realism in Theory and Practice. International Affairs 67:527-545.
12. BOOTH, K. (1996) "75 Years On: Rewriting the Subject's Past - Reinventing Its Future." In International Theory: Positivism & Beyond, edited by S. Smith, K. Booth, and M. Zalewski, pp. 328-339. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. BORCHARD, E. M. (1924) "Political Theory and International Law." In A History of Political Theories: Recent Times, edited by C. Merriam and E. M. Barnes, pp. 120-140. New York: Macmillan.
14. BOYLE, F. (1985) World Politics and International Law. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
15. BRYCE, J. (1922) International Relations. Port Washington, WA: Kennikat Press.
16. BULL, H. (1972a) International Relations as an Academic Pursuit. Australian Outlook 26:251-265.
17. BULL, H. (1972b) "The Theory of International Politics, 1919-1969." In The Aberystwyth Papers: International Politics 1919-1969, edited by B. Porter, pp. 30-55. London: Oxford University Press.
18. BURGESS, J. (1933) The Foundations of Political Science. New York: Columbia University Press.
19. BURGESS, J. (1993) "The Idea and Forms of the State." In Discipline and History: Political Science in the United States, edited by J. Farr and R. Seidelman, pp. 49-58. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
20. BUZAN, B., ET AL. (1993) The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism. New York: Columbia University Press.
21. CALLAHAN, D. (1994) Between Two Worlds: Realism, Idealism, and American Foreign Policy After the Cold War. New York: HarperCollins.
22. CAPORASO, J. (1997) Across the Great Divide: Integrating Comparative and International Politics. International Studies Quarterly 41:563-592.
23. CARR, E. H. (1964) The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. New York: Harper & Row.
24. COKER, F. (1924) "Pluralistic Theories and the Attack upon State Sovereignty." In A History of Political Theories: Recent Times, edited by C. E. Merriam and H. E. Barnes, pp. 80-119. New York: Macmillan Co.
25. DICKINSON, G. L. (1916) The European Anarchy. New York: Macmillan Co.
26. DICKINSON, G. L. (1926) International Anarchy, 1904-1914. New York: Century Co.
27. DONNELLY, J. (1995) "Realism and the Academic Study of International Relations." In Political Science in History: Research Program and Political Traditions, edited by J. Farr, J. S. Dryzek, and S. T. Leonard, pp. 175-197. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. DOYLE, M. (1986) Liberalism and World Politics. American Political Science Review 80:1151-1169.
29. DUGGAN, S. (1919) The league of Nations: The Principle and the Practice. Boston: Atlantic Monthly Press.
30. DUNN, F. S. (1948) The Scope of International Relations. World Politics 1:142-146.
31. EISENBERG, A. (1995) Reconstructing Political Pluralism. Albany: State University of New York Press.
32. ELLIS, E. (1920) The Pluralistic State. American Political Science Review 14:393-407.
33. FARR, J. (1990) Francis Lieber and the Interpretation of American Political Science. Journal of Politics 52:1027-1049.
34. FARR, J. (1993) "Political Science and the State." In Discipline and History: Political Science in the United States, edited by J. Farr and R. Seidelman, pp. 63-79. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
35. FERGUSON, Y., AND R. MANSBACH (1988) The Elusive Quest: Theory and International Politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
36. FOLLETT, M. (1934) The New State: Group Organization and the Solution of Popular Sovereignty. London: Longmans, Green.
37. FOWLER, R., AND J. M. BUNCK (1995) Law, Power, and the Sovereign State: The Evolution and Application of the Concept of Sovereignty. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
38. GARNER, J. (1925) Limitations on National Sovereignty in International Relations. American Political Science Review 19:1-24.
39. GEORGE, J. (1994) Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
40. GOLDMAN, K. (1988) The Concept of Realism as a Source of Confusion. Cooperation and Conflict 23:1-14.
41. GOODNOW, F. (1904) The Work of the American Political Science Association. Proceedings of the APSA 1:35-46.
42. GRIFFITHS, M. (1992) Order and International Society: The Real Realism? Review of International Studies 18:217-240.
43. GROOM, A. J. R. (1994) "Introduction: The Past as Prelude." In Contemporary International Relations: A Guide to Theory, edited by A. J. R. Groom and M. Light, pp. 1-6. London: Pinter.
44. GUNNELL, J. (1991) Disciplinary History: The Case of Political Science. Strategies: A Journal of Theory, Culture and Politics 4/5:182-227.
45. GUNNELL, J. (1993) The Descent of Political Theory: A Genealogy of an American Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46. GURIAN, W. (1946) On the Study of International Relations. The Review of Politics 8:275-282.
47. HELD, D. (1991) Political Theory Today. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
48. HELD, D. (1995) Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
49. HERZ, J. (1950) Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma. World Politics 2:157-180.
50. HILL, D. (1896) International Justice. Yale Law Journal 6:1-19.
51. HILL, D. (1911) World Organization as Affected by the Nature of the Modern State. New York: Columbia University Press.
52. HILL, D. (1919) Present Problems in Foreign Policy. New York: D. Appleton and Co.
53. HIRST, P. (1993) The Pluralist Theory of the State. London: Routledge.
54. HOBHOUSE, L. T. (1918) The Metaphysical Theory of the State: A Criticism. New York: Macmillan Co.
55. HOBSON, J. (1916) Towards International Government. New York: Macmillan Co.
56. HOFFMANN, S. (1977) An American Social Science: International Relations. Daedalus 106:41-59.
57. KAHLER, M. (1993) "International Relations: Still an American Social Science?" In Ideas and Ideals: Essays on Politics in Honor of Stanley Hoffmann, edited by L. B. Miller and M. J. Smith, pp. 395-414. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
58. KAHLER, M. (1997) "Inventing International Relations: International Relations Theory After 1945." In New Thinking in International Relations Theory, edited by M. Doyle and J. Ikenberry, pp. 20-53. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
59. KAPLAN, M (1961) Is International Relations a Discipline? The Journal of Politics 23:462-476.
60. KEGLEY, C. (1993) The Neoidealist Moment in International Studies. International Studies Quarterly 37:131-146.
61. KEGLEY, C. (1995) "The Neoliberal Challenge to Realist Theories of World Politics." In Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge, edited by C. Kegley, pp. 1-24. New York: St. Martin's Press.
62. KEGLEY, C., AND E. WITTKOPF (1989) World Politics: Trend and Transformation. New York: St. Martin's Press.
63. KENNAN, G. (1951) American Diplomacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64. KEOHANE, R. (1990) "International Liberalism Reconsidered." In The Economic Limits to Modern Politics, edited by J. Dunn, pp. 165-194. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. KIRK, G. (1947) The Study of International Relations in American Colleges and Universities. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
66. KNUTSEN, T. (1992) A History of International Relations Theory. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
67. KRABBE, H. (1922) The Modern Idea of the State. New York: D. Appleton and Co.
68. KRASNER, S. (1995/96) Compromising Westphalia. International Security 20:115-151.
69. KRIPPENDORF, E. (1987) The Dominance of American Approaches in International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 16:207-214.
70. KROMBACH, H. (1992) International Relations as an Academic Discipline. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 21:243-258.
71. KUEHL, W. (1969) Seeking World Order: The United States and International Organization to 1920. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
72. KUPCHAN, C. A., AND C. A. KUPCHAN (1991) Concerts, Collective Security, and the Future of Europe. International Security 16:114-161.
73. LAKE, D. (1992) Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and War. American Political Science Review 86:24-37.
74. LASKI, H. J. (1921) The Foundations of Sovereignty and Other Essays. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
75. LASKI, H. J. (1927) "International Government and National Sovereignty." In The Problems of Peace: Lectures Delivered at the Geneva Institute of International Relations, pp. 288-312. London: Oxford University Press.
76. LEBOW, R., AND T. RISSE-KAPPEN (1995) International Relations Thoery and the End of the Cold War. New York: Columbia University Press.
77. LIEBER, F. (1880) Miscellaneous Writings. 2 vols. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co.
78. LIEBER, F. (1885) Manual of Political Ethics, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co.
79. LIEBER F. (1993) "History and Political Science, Necessary Studies in Free Countries." In Discipline and History, edited by J. Farr and R. Seidelman, pp. 21-32. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
80. LIJPHART, A. (1974) The Structure of the Theoretical Revolution in International Relations. International Studies Quarterly 18:41-74.
81. LITTLE, R. (1996) "The Growing Relevance of Pluralism?" In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, edited by S. Smith, K. Booth, and M. Zalewski, pp. 66-86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82. LONG, D (1996) Towards a New Liberal Internationalism: The International Theory of J. A. Hobson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
83. LONG, D., AND P. WILSON (1995) Thinkers of the Twenty Years' Crisis: Inter-War Idealism Reasessed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
84. MAGHROORI, R. (1982) "Introduction: Major Debates in International Relations." In Globalism Versus Realism: International Relations' Third Debate, edited by R. Maghroori and B. Ramberg, pp. 9-22. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
85. MERRIAM, C. (1924) "Recent Tendencies in Political Thought." In A History of Political Theories: Recent Times, edited by C. Merriam and H. E. Barnes, pp. 1-45. New York: Macmillan Co.
86. MILNER, H. (1991) The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: A Critique. Review of International Studies 17:67-85.
87. MORAVCSIK, A. (1992) Liberalism and International Relations Theory. Working Paper. Harvard CFIA, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
88. MORGENTHAU, H. (1948) Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
89. MURPHY, C. (1994) International Organization and Industrial Change: Global Governance Since 1850. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
90. NEAL, F., AND B. HAMLETT (1969) The Never-Never Land of International Relations. International Studies Quarterly 13:281-305.
91. OLSON, W. (1972) "The Growth of a Discipline." In The Aberystwyth Papers: International Politics 1919-1969, edited by B. Porter, pp. 3-29. London: Oxford University Press.
92. OLSON, W., AND A. J. R. GROOM (1991) International Relations Then and Now: Origins and Trends in Interpretation. London: HarperCollins.
93. OLSON, W., AND N. ONUF (1985) "The Growth of a Discipline: Reviewed." In International Relations: British and American Perspectives, edited by S. Smith, pp. 1-28. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
94. OPPENHEIM, L. (1908) The Science of International Law: Its Task and Method. American Journal of International Law 2:313-356.
95. OREN, I. (1995) The Subjectivity of the "Democrat," Peace: Changing U.S. Perceptions of Imperial Germany. International Security 20:147-184.
96. OWEN, J. (1994) How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace. International Security 19:87-125.
97. PALAN, R., AND B. BLAIR (1993) On the Idealist Origins of the Realist Theory of International Relations. Review of International Studies 19:385-399.
98. PALMER, N. (1980) The Study of International Relations in the United States. International Studies Quarterly 24:343-364.
99. PARKMAN, A. (1975) David Jayne Hill and the Problem of Peace. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.
100. PORTER, B. (1972) The Aberystwyth Papers: International Politics 1919-1969. London: Oxford University Press.
101. POTTER, P. (1923) Political Science in the International Field. American Political Science Review 27:381-391.
102. POTTER, P. (1925), An Introduction to the Study of International Organization. New York: Century Co.
103. POTTER, P. (1932) "International Organization." In Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 8, edited by R. A. Seligman, pp. 177-185. New York: Macmillan Co.
104. RAY, J. (1995) Democracy and International Conflict: An Evaluation of the Democratic Peace Proposition. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
105. REINSCH, P. (1900) World Politics at the End of the Nineteenth Century, As, Influenced by the Oriental Situation. New York: Macmillan Co.
106. REINSCH, P. (1905) Colonial Administration. New York: Macmillan Co.
107. REINSCH, P. (1911) Public International Unions, Their Work and Organization: A Study in International Administrative Law. Boston: Gin and Co.
108. RICHARDSON, J. (1990) "The Academic Study of International Relations." In Order and Violence: Hedley Bull and International Relations., edited by J. D. B. Miller and R. J. Vincent, pp. 140-185. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
109. ROSENAU, J. (1990) Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
110. ROSENBERG, J. (1990) What's the Matter with Realism? Review of International Studies 16:285-305.
111. RUNCIMAN, D. (1997) Pluralism and the Personality of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
112. RUSSETT, B. (1993) Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
113. SCHMIDT, B. (1994) The Historiography of Academic International Relations. Review of International Studies 20:349-367.
114. SCHMIDT, B. (1998) The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. Albany: State University of New York Press.
115. SCHUMAN, F. (1933) International Politics: An Introduction to the Western State System. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
116. SMITH, M. (1986) Realist Thought from Weber to Kissinger. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
117. SMITH, S. (1985) International Relations: British and American Perspectives. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
118. SMITH, S. (1987) Paradigm Dominance in International Relations: The Development of International Relations as a Social Science. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 16:189-206.
119. SOMIT, A., AND J. TANENHAUS (1967) The Development of American Political Science: From Burgess to Behavioralism. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
120. THOMPSON, K. (1960) Political Realism and the Crisis of World Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
121. THOMSON, J. (1995) State Sovereignty in International Relations: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Empirical Research. International Studies Quarterly 39:213-233.
122. TREITSCHKE, H. VON (1970) "Politics." In The Theory of International Relations: Selected Texts from Gentili to Treitschke, edited by M. G. Forsyth, pp. 325-353. New York: Atherton Press.
123. VASQUEZ, J. (1983) The Power of Power Politics: A Critique. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
124. WALKER, R. B. J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
125. WALTZ, K. (1959) Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
126. WALTZ, K. (1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
127. WEBSTER, C. (1933) The League of Nations in Theory and Practice. London: Allen and Unwin.
128. WENDT, A. (1992) Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization 46:391-425.
129. WILDE, J. (1991) Saved from Oblivion: Interdependence Theory in the First Half of the 20th Century. Aldershot, England: Dartmouth.
130. WILLOUGHBY, W. W. (1896) An Examination of the Nature of the State. New York: Macmillan Co.
131. WILLOUGHBY, W. W. (1904) The American Political Science Association. Political Science Quarterly 19:107-111.
132. WILLOUGHBY, W. W. (1918) The Juristic Conception of the State. American Political Science Review 12:192-208.
133. WOOLF, L. (1916) International Government: Two Reports. New York: Brentano's.
134. WRIGHT, Q. (1930) Research in International Law Since the War. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
135. WRIGHT, Q. (1955) The Study of International Relations. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
136. ZACHER, M., AND R. MATTHEW (1995) "Liberal International Theory: Common Threads, Divergent Strands." In Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge, edited by C. Kegley, pp. 107-150. New York: St. Martin's Press.
137. ZIMMERN, A. (1936) The League of Nations and the Rule of Law. London: Macmillan and Co.