Effects of plant cutting and dredging on habitat conditions in streams

Archiv fur Hydrobiologie

Volumn 143, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 257-273

  Kaenel, Barbara R ^a   Uehlinger, Urs ^a  

^a SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF AQUATIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CUTTING; DREDGING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; HABITAT STRUCTURE; STREAM; VEGETATION;

SWITZERLAND;

EID: 0031767539     PISSN: 00039136     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1127/archiv-hydrobiol/143/1998/257     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. AUSTIN, M. P. (1987): Models for the analysis of species response to environmental gradient. - Vegetatio 69: 35-45.
2. BIGGS, B. (1996): Hydraulic habitat of plants in streams. - Regul. Riv.: Res. Managem. 12: 131-144.
3. BIONDINI, M. E., MIELKE, P. W. & BERRY, K. J. (1988): Data-dependent permutation techniques for the analysis of ecological data. - Vegetatio 75: 161-168.
4. BROOKER, M. P., MORRIS, D. L. & WILSON, C. J. (1978): Plant-flow relationships in the R. Wye catchment. - In: Proceedings EWRS 5th Symposium on Aquatic Weeds, Amsterdam, pp. 63-70.
5. BUTCHER, R. W. (1933): Studies on the ecology of rivers. - J. Ecol. 21: 58-91.
6. CAFFREY, J. M. (1990): Problems relating to the management of Potamogeton pectinatus L. in Irish rivers. - In: Proceedings EWRS 8th Symposium on Aquatic Weeds, Uppsala, pp. 61-68.
7. CONOVER, W. J. & IMAN, R. L. (1981): Rank transformation as a bridge between parametric and non-parametric statistics. - Amer. Statistician 35: 124-133.
8. DAWSON, F. H. (1978): The seasonal effects of aquatic plant growth on the flow of water in a stream. - In: Proceedings EWRS 5th Symposium on Aquatic Weeds, Amsterdam, pp. 71-78.
9. DAWSON, F. H., CLINTON, E. M. F. & LADLE, M. (1991): Invertebrates on cut weed removed during weed-cutting operations along an English river, the River Frome. -Aquacult. Fish. Managem. 22: 113-121.
10. DAWSON, F. H. & ROBINSON, W. N. (1984): Submerged macrophytes and the hydraulic roughness of a lowland chalkstream. - Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol. 22: 1944-1948.
11. DOWNES, B. J., LAKE, P. S. & SCHREIBER, E. S. G. (1993): Spatial variation in the distribution of stream invertebrates: implications of patchiness for models of community organization. - Freshwat. Biol. 30: 119-132.
12. EDWARDS, R. W. & OWENS, M. (1965): The oxygen balance of streams. - In: Ecology and the Industrial Society. Fifth Symposium of the British Ecological Society. -Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 149-172.
13. FISHER, S. G. & CARPENTER, S. R. (1976): Ecosystem and macrophyte primary production of the Fort River, Massachusetts. - Hydrobiologia 47: 175-187.
14. GORDON, N. D., MCMAHON, T. A. & FINLAYSON, B. L. (1992): Stream Hydrology: an introduction for ecologists. - John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, p. 526.
15. GREEN, R. H. (1979): Sampling design and statistical methods for environmental biologists. - John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, p. 257.
16. GREGG, W. W. & ROSE, F. L. (1982): The effects of aquatic macrophytes on the stream microenvironment. - Aquat. Bot. 14: 309-324.
17. HAMPEL, F. R., RONCHETTI, P. J., BOUSSEEUW, P. J. & STAHEL, W. A. (1986). Robust statistics: the approach based on influence functions. - John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, p. 502.
18. HASLAM, S. M. & WOLSELEY, P. A. (1987): River plants of Western Europe. The macrophytic vegetation of watercourses of the European Economic Community. -Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 200.
19. HEARNE, J. W. & ARMITAGE, P. D. (1993): Implications of the annual macrophyte growth cycle on habitat in rivers. - Regul. Riv.: Res. Managem. 8: 313-322.
20. HURLBERT, S. H. (1984): Pseudoreplication and design of ecological field experiments. - Ecol. Mon. 54: 187-211.
21. KAENEL, B. R., MATTHAEI, C. D. & UEHLINGER, U. (1998): Disturbance by aquatic plant management in streams: effects on benthic invertebrates. - Regul. Riv.: Res. Managem. 14: 341-356.
22. MADSEN, T. V. & WARNCKE, E. (1983): Velocities of currents around and within submerged aquatic vegetation. - Arch. Hydrobiol. 97: 389-394.
23. MARSHALL, E. J. P. & WESTLAKE, D. F. (1990): Water velocities around water plants in chalk streams. - Folia geobotanica et phytotaxonomica 25: 279-289.
24. MENSCH, R., KAENEL, B. & UEHLINGER, U. (1997): Kurzfristige Auswirkungen einer Entkrautung auf einen Mittellandbach (Chriesbach bei Dübendorf, ZH). - Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforsch. Ges. Zürich 142: 23-31.
25. NEWALL, A. M. (1995): The microflow environment of aquatic plants - an ecological perspective. - In: HARPER, D. M. & FERGUSON, A. J. D. (eds): The ecological basis for river management. - John Wiley & Sons Ltd., pp. 79-103.
26. PIETERSE, A. H. & MURPHY, K. J. (1990): Aquatic Weeds: The ecology and management of nuisance aquatic vegetation. - Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 593.
27. PITLO, R. H. & DAWSON, H. (1990): Flow-resistance of aquatic weeds. - In. PIETERSE, A. H. & MURPHY, K. J. (eds.): Aquatic Weeds. - Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 74-84.
28. POTVIN, C. & ROFF, D. A. (1993): Distribution-free and robust statistical methods: viable alternatives to parametric statistics? - Ecology 74: 1617-1628.
29. POWELL, K. E. C. (1978): Weed growth - a factor of channel roughness. - In HERSHEY, R. W. (ed.): Hydrometry: Principles and Practices. - John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, pp. 327-352.
30. RICE, W. R. (1989): Analyzing tables of statistical tests. - Evolution 43: 223-225.
31. ROTENBERRY, J. T. & WIENS, J. A. (1985): Statistical power analysis and community-wide patterns. - Amer. Nat. 125: 164-168.
32. TOFT, C. A. & SHEA, P. J. (1983): Detecting community-wide patterns: estimating power strengthens statistical inference. - Amer. Nat. 122: 618-625.
33. UEHLINGER, U. (1994): Sauerstoff in der Glatt: Photosynthese, Respiration und Sauerstoffhaushalt in einem anthropogen stark beeinflussten Mittellandfluss. -Gas, Wasser, Abwasser 2: 123-128.
34. WADE, P. M. (1992): Management of macrophytic vegetation. - In: CALOW, P. & PETTS, G. E. (eds.): The rivers handbook: hydrological and ecological principles. -Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 363-385.
35. WATSON, D. (1987): Hydraulic effects of aquatic weeds in U.K. rivers. - Regul. Riv.: Res. Managem. 1: 211-227.
36. WESTLAKE, D. F. (1968): The biology of aquatic weeds in relation to their management. - In: Proceedings of the 9th British Weed Control Conference, pp. 372-379.
37. WESTLAKE, D. F., CASEY, H., DAWSON, H., LADLE, M., MANN, R. H. K. & MARKER, A. F. H. (1972): The chalk-stream ecosystem. - In: KAJAK, Z. & HILLBRICHT-ILKOWSKA, A. (eds.): Proceedings of the IBP-UNESCO Symposium on Productivitv Problems of Freshwaters. - Kazimierz Dolny, Poland, pp. 615-635.
38. YOCCOZ, N. G. (1991): Use, overuse, and misuse of significance tests in evolutionary biology and ecology. - Bull. Ecol. Soc. Amer. 72: 107-111.