Genotype-by-environment interaction effect on yield and its physiological bases in short-duration pigeonpea

Field Crops Research

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 141-150

  Chauhan, Y S ^a   Wallace, D H ^a   Johansen, C ^a   Singh, Laxman ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR THE SEMI ARID TROPICS ICRISAT   (India)

Author keywords

Cajanus cajan; Genotype by environment interaction; Pigeonpea; Yield

Indexed keywords

CROP YIELD; CULTIVAR; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GROWTH RATE; HYBRID; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PIGEONPEA;

CAJANUS CAJAN;

EID: 0031766968     PISSN: 03784290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4290(98)00117-8     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bidinger, F.R., Hammer, G.L., Muchow, R.C., 1996. The physiological basis of genotype by environment interaction in crop adaptation. In: Copper, M., Hammer, G.L. (Eds.), Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, IRRI, Manila, Philippines, and ICRISAT, Patancheru, India, pp. 329-348.
2. Chauhan Y.S., Johansen C., Saxena K.B. Physiological basis of yield variation in short-duration pigeonpea grown in different environments of semi-arid-tropics. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 174:1995;163-171.
3. Chauhan Y.S., Vekataratnam N., Sheldrake A.R. Factors affecting growth and yield of short-duration pigeonpea and its potential for multiple harvests. J. Agric. Sci., Camb. 109:1987;519-520.
4. Cober E.R., Tanner J.W. Performance of related indeterminate and tall determinate soybean lines in short-season areas. Crop Sci. 35:1995;361-364.
5. Cooper M., DeLacy I.H. Relationships among analytical methods used to study genotypic variation and genotype-by-environment interaction in plant breeding multi-environment experiments. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:1994;561-572.
6. Cram, J., 1980. The higher plant as a whole. In: Spanswick, R.M., Lucas, W.J., Dainty, J. (Eds.), Plant Membrane Transport: Current Conceptual Issues. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, New York, pp. 3-13.
7. Davis D.W., Gingera G.R., Sauter J.J. MN 1, MN 5, and MN 8 early duration pigeonpea lines. International Chickpea and Pigeonpea Newsletter. 2:1995;57-58.
8. Duncan W.G., McCloud D.E., McGraw R., Boote K.J. Physiological aspects of peanut yield improvement. Crop Sci. 18:1978;1015-1020.
9. Eberhart S.A., Russell W.A. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6:1966;36-40.
10. Finlay K.W., Wilkinson G.N. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14:1963;742-754.
11. Gauch, H. G., Jr., 1992. Statistical Analysis of Regional Yield Trials. AMMI Analysis of Factorial Designs. Elsevier, New York.
12. Gauch H.G. Jr., Zobel R.W. Identifying megaenvironments and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci. 37:1997;311-326.
13. Gupta S.C., Kapoor R.K. Inheritance of growth habit in pigeonpea. Crop Sci. 31:1991;1456-1459.
14. Laxman Singh, S.C. Gupta, Faris, D.G., 1990. Pigeonpea: Breeding. In: Nene, Y.L., Hall, S.D., Sheila, V.K. (Eds.), The Pigeonpea. CABI, Wallingford, UK and ICRISAT, Patancheru, India, pp. 375-399.
15. Reddy, S.J., Virmani, S.M., 1981. Pigeonpea and its climatic environment. In: Proc. Int. Workshop on Pigeonpeas. ICRISAT Center, India. vol. 1, Patancheru, AP 502324, India, pp. 259-270.
16. Saxena, K.B., Chauhan, Y.S., Laxman Singh, Kumar, R.V., Johansen, C., 1996. Research and development of hybrid pigeonpea. Research Bulletin no. 19. Patancheru 502324, Andhra Pradesh, India, p. 20.
17. Simmonds N.W. Selection for local adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82:1991;363-367.
18. van Eeuwijk F.A. Multiplicative interaction in generalized linear models. Biometrics. 51:1995;1017-1032.
19. Wallace, D.H., Zobel, R.W., 1995. Whole system research complements reductive research. In: Pessarkli, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Plant and Crop Physiology. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 833-848.
20. William J.H., Saxena N.P. The use of non-destructive measurement and physiological models of yield determination to investigate factors determining differences in seed yield between genotypes of 'desi' chickpeas (Cicer arietinum). Ann. Appl. Biol. 119:1991;105-112.
21. Yau S.K. Regression and AMMI analysis of genotype×environment interactions: An empirical comparison. Agron. J. 87:1995;121-126.
22. Zobel R.W., Wright M.J., Gauch H.G. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agron. J. 80:1988;388-399.