Hybrid vigor for clonal growth in Carpobrotus (Aizoaceae) in coastal California

Ecological Applications

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 1196-1205

  Vilà', Monserrat ^a,b   D'Antonio, Carla M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Biological invasion; Clonal growth; Exotic species; Hybrid superiority; Mammalian herbivory

Indexed keywords

CLONING; HYBRIDIZATION; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT GENETICS; PLANT GROWTH; SURVIVAL; UNITED STATES;

CLONAL GROWTH; GROWTH RESPONSE; HERBIVORY; HYBRIDIZATION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

CARPOBROTUS; CARPOBROTUS CHILENSIS; CARPOBROTUS EDULIS;

EID: 0031766471     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2640972     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abbott, R. J. 1992. Hybridization and the evolution of new plant taxa. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7:401-405.
2. Albert, M. E. 1995a. Morphological variation and habitat association within the Carpobrotus species complex in coastal California. Thesis. University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
3. _. 1995b. Portrait of an invader: II. The ecology and management of Carpobrotus edulis. California Exotic Plant Pest Council News 3:4-6.
4. Albert, M. E., C. M. D' Antonio, and K. A. Schierenbeck, 1997. Hybridization and introgression in Carpobrotus spp. (Aizoaceae) in California: I. Morphological evidence. American Journal of Botany 84:896-904.
5. Anderson, L. W. J., L. DiTomaso, A. Howald, J. Randall. M. Rejmanek, and J. S. Chairman. 1996. Exotic pest plants of greatest ecological concern in California. California Exotic Plant Pest Council Special Publication.
6. Arnold, M. L. 1992. Natural hybridization as an evolutionary process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23:237-261.
7. Arnold, M. L., and S. A. Hodges. 1995. Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10:67-70.
8. Barton, N. H., and G. M. Hewitt. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16: 113-148.
9. Bennet, B. D., and J. B. Grace. 1990. Shade tolerance and its effect on the segregation of two species of Louisiana iris and their hybrids. American Journal of Botany 77: 100-107.
10. Bicknell, S. H., and E. M. Mackney. 1988. Evidence of early occurrence of Carpobrotus aequilaterus N. E. Br. at Marina Beach State Park, CA. Department of Parks and Recreation Final Report 05-10-065.
11. Boecklen, W. J., and R. Spellenberg. 1990. Structure of herbivore communities in two oak (Quercus spp.) hybrid zones. Oecologia 85:92-100.
12. Crawley, M. J. 1993. GLIM for ecologists. Blackwell Scientific, Cambridge. Massachusetts, USA.
13. D'Antonio, C. M. 1990. Seed production and dispersal in the non-native, invasive succulent Carpobrotus edulis (Aizoaceae) in coastal strand communities of central California. Journal of Applied Ecology 27:693-702.
14. -. 1993. Mechanisms controlling invasion of coastal plant communities by the alien succulent Carpobrotus edulis. Ecology 74:83-95.
15. D'Antonio, C. M., D. C. Odion, and C. M. Tyler. 1993. Invasion of maritime chaparral by the introduced succulent Carpobrotus edulis: the roles of fire and herbivory. Oecologia 95:14-21.
16. Dobzhansky, T. 1970. Genetics of the evolutionary process. Columbia University Press. New York, New York, USA.
17. Ellstrand, N. 1992. Gene flow by pollen: implications for plant conservation genetics. Oikos 63:77-86.
18. Emms, S. K.,and M. L. Arnold. 1997. The effect of habitat on parental and hybrid fitness: transplant experiments with Louisiana irises. Evolution 51:1112-1119.
19. Eriksson, O. 1993. Dynamics of genets in clonal plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8:313-316.
20. Frankel, R. 1983. Heterosis. Monographs on theoretical and applied genetics. 6. Springer-Verlag. Berlin. Germany.
21. Fritz, R. S., C. M. Nichols-Orians, and S. J. Brunsfeld. 1994. Interspecific hybridization of plants and resistance to herbivores: hypothesis, genetics, and variable responses in a diverse herbivore community. Oecologia 97:106-117.
22. Gallagher, K. G., K. A. Schierenbeck, and C. M. D'Antonio. 1997. Hybridization and introgression in Carpobrotus spp. (Aizoaceae) in California: II. Isozyme evidence. American Journal of Botany 84:905-911.
23. Gottlieb, L. D. 1984. Genetics and morphological evolution in plants. American Naturalist 123:681-709.
24. Graham, J. H., D. C. Freeman, and E. D. McArthur. 1995. Narrow hybrid zone between two subspecies of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata: Asteraceae). II. Selection gradients and hybrid fitness. American Journal of Botany 82:709-716.
25. Harrison, R. G. 1993. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
26. Hickman, J. C., editor. 1993. The Jepson manual. University of California Press. Berkeley, California, USA.
27. Hilu, K. W. 1983. The role of single-gene mutations in the evolution of flowering plants. Evolutionary Biology 26:97-128.
28. Holm, L., D. L. Plucknett, J. Pancho, and J. P. Herberger, 1970. The world's worst weeds: distribution and biology. Hawaii University Press, Honolulu, Hawaii.
29. Mitton, J. B., and M. C. Grant. 1984. Associations among protein heterozygosity, growth rate, and developmental homeostasis. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15:479-499.
30. Moore, W. S. 1977. An evaluation of narrow hybrid zones in vertebrates. Quarterly Review of Biology 52:263-277.
31. Percy, R. G., and E. L. Turcotte. 1991. Early-maturing, short-statured American pima cotton parents improve agronomic traits of interspecific hybrids. Crop Science 31:709-712.
32. Pollard, A. J. 1992. The importance of deterrence: responses of grazing animals to plant variation. Pages 216-239 in R. S. Fritz and E. L. Simms. editors. Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
33. Rhymer, J. M., and D. Simberloff. 1996. Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27:83-109.
34. Rieseberg, L. H. 1995. The role of hybridization in evolution: old wine in new skins. American Journal of Botany 82:944-953.
35. Rosenthal, J. P., and P. M. Kotanen. 1994. Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:145-148.
36. Schoneweis, S., and H. T. Erickson. 1989. Heterosis for vegetative growth in indeterminate lima beans. Hortscience 2:1018-1020.
37. Shaw, R. G., and T. Mitchell-Olds. 1993. ANOVA for unbalanced data: an overview. Ecology 74:1638-1645.
38. Sinha, S. K., and R. Khanna. 1975. Physiological, biochemical, and genetic basis of heterosis. Advances in Agronomy 27:123-173.
39. Strauss, S. Y. 1990. The role of plant genotype, environment and gender in resistance to a specialist chrysomelid herbivore. Oecologia 84:111-116.
40. _. 1994. Levels of herbivory and parasitism in host hybrid zones. Trends in Ecolocy and Evolution 9:209-213.
41. Thompson, J. D. 1991. The biology of an invasive plant. BioScience 41:393-401.
42. Vilà, M., and C. M. D'Antonio. 1998a. Fruit choice and seed dispersal of invasive vs. non-invasive Carpobrotus (Aizoaceae) in coastal California. Ecology 79:1053-1060.
43. Vilà, M., and C. M. D'Antonio. 1998b. Fitness of invasive Carpobrotus (Aizoaceae) hybrids in coastal California. Ecoscience 5, in press.
44. Walton, P. D. 1971. Heterosis in spring wheat. Crop Science 11:422-424.
45. Westoby, M. A. 1974. An analysis of diet selection by large generalist herbivores. American Naturalist 108: 290-305.
46. Whitman, T. G., P. A. Morrow, and B. M. Potts. 1994. Plant hybrid zones as centers of biodiversity: the herbivore community of two endemic Tasmanian eucalypts. Oecologia 97:481-490.
47. Williamson, M. 1996. Biological invasions. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
48. Wisura, W., and H. F. Glen. 1993. The South African species of Carpobrotus (Mesembryanthema-Aizoaceae). Contributions from the Bolus Herbarium 15:76-107.
49. Zar, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey, USA.