District diabetes registers: More trouble than they're worth?

Diabetic Medicine

Volumn 15, Issue SUPPL. 3, 1998, Pages

  Elwyn, G J ^a   Vaughan, N J A ^b   Stott, N C H ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL SUSSEX COUNTY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIABETES MELLITUS; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RECORD; PATIENT INFORMATION; PRIVACY; REGISTER; REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM;

CONFIDENTIALITY; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIABETES MELLITUS; ETHICS; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; REGISTRIES;

EID: 0031766239     PISSN: 07423071     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9136(1998110)15:3+3.3.co;2-k     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. NHS Executive. Chronic Disease Management Registers: Executive Letter (1996) 72. Leeds: NHS Executive, 1996.
2. Charles C, Gafni A, and Whelan T. Shared decisionmaking in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 1997; 44: 681-692.
3. Sculpher MJ, Buxton MJ, Ferguson BA, Spiegelhalter DJ, Kirby AJ. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: a relative cost-effectivensss analysis of alternative modalities and strategies. Health Economics 1992; 1: 39-51.
4. Laairson DR, Pugh JA, Kapadia AS, Lorimor RJ, Jacobson J, Velez R, Cost-effectiveness of alternative methods for diabetic retinopathy screening. Diabetes Care 1992; 115: 1369-1377.
5. Rand LI. Financial implications of implementing standards of care for diabetic eye disease. Diabetes Care 1992; 15: 32-35.
6. Stott NCH. Organisational methods for continuing care. In: Primary Care. Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice. Berlin/London: Springer-Verlag, 1983.
7. Murphy E, Kinmonth AL. No symptoms, no problem? Patients' understandings of non-insulin dependent diabetes. Family Practice 1995; 12: 184-192.
8. Vaughan NJ, Shaw M, Boer F, Billett D, Martin C. Creation of a district diabetic register using the DIALOG system. Diabetic Med 1996; 13: 175-181.
9. World Health Organization (Europe) and International Diabetes Foundation (Europe). Diabetes care and research in Europe: the St Vincent declaration. Diabetic Med 1990; 7: 360.
10. Marks L. Counting the Cost: the Real Impact of Non-insulin Dependent Diabetes. London: King's Fund Policy Institute, 1996.
11. Hurwitz B, Goodman C, Yudkin J. Prompting the clinical care of non-insulin dependent (type II) diabetic patients in an inner city area: one model of community care. Br Med J 1995; 306: 624-630.
12. Hoskins PL, Fowler PM, Constantino M, Forrest J, Yue DK, Turtle JR. Sharing the care of diabetic patients between hospital and general practitioners: does it work? Diabetic Med 1993; 10: 81-86.
13. Diabetes Integrated Care Evaluation Team. Integrated care for diabetes: clinical, psychosocial, and economic evaluation. Br Med J 1994; 308: 1208-1212.
14. Greenhalgh PM. Shared Care for Diabetes. A Systematic Review. Occasional Paper 67. London: Royal College of General Practitioners, 1994.
15. Vaughan NJ, Hopkinson N, Chishty VA. DIALOG: coordination of the annual review process through a district diabetes register linked to the FHSA database. Diabetic Med 1996; 13: 182-188.
16. Burnett SD, Woolf CM, and Yudkin JS. Developing a district diabetic register. Br Med J 1992; 305: 627-630.
17. Howitt AJ, Cheales NA. Diabetes registers: a grassroots Approach. Br Med J 1993; 307: 1046-1048.
18. Langley JD, Botha JL. Use of record linkage to maintain the Leicestershire Diabetes Register. Computer Methods & Programs in Biomedicine 1994; 4: 287-295.
19. Holloway G, Garson P. Security, confidentiality and consent in district disease registers. Audit Trends 1997; 5: 13-16.
20. General Medical Council. The Duties of a Doctor: Confidentiality, Guidance from the GMC. London: General Medical Council, 1995.
21. Anderson RJ. Security in Clinical Information Systems. Commissioned for BMA Council by BMA Information Technology Committee, 1996.
22. Health Service Guidelines Circular: NHSE: HSG(96)18. The Protection and Use of Patient Information - Guidance from the Department of Health. London: Department of Health: 1996.
23. The Data Protection Act: A Code of Practice for General Medical Practitioners London GMSC: 1991.
24. http://www.morgannwg-maag.org.uk/gpac.htm.
25. Whitford DL, Southern AJ, Braid E, Roberts SH. Comprehensive diabetes care in North Tyneside. Diabetic Med 1995; 12: 691-695.
26. Morris AD, Boyle DIR, MacAlpine R, Emslie-Smith A, Jung RT, Newton RW, MacDonald TM for the DARTS/MEMO Collaboration. The diabetes audit and research in Tayside Scotland (DARTS) study: electronic record linkage to create a diabetes register. Br Med J 1997; 315: 524-528.
27. Vaughan NJ, Home PD. The UK Diabetes Dataset: a standard for information exchange. Diabetes Audit Working Group of the Research Unit of the Royal College of Physicians and the British Diabetic Association. Diabetic Med 1995; 12: 717-722.
28. Butler C, Peters J, Stott NCH. Glycosylated haemoglobin and metabolic control of diabetes mellitus: external versus locally established clinical targets for primary care. Br Med J 1995; 310: 784-788.
29. Griffin S. Lost to follow-up: the problem of defaulters from diabetes clinics. Diabetic Med 1998; 15 (suppl 3): S14-S24.
30. Rollnick S, Kinnersley P, Stott NCH. Methods of helping patients with behaviour change. Br Med J 1993; 307: 188-190.
31. Stott NC, Rollnick S, Rees MR, Pill RM. Innovation in clinical method: diabetes care and negotiating skills. Family Practice 1995; 12: 413-418.
32. Stott NC, Rees M, Rollnick S, Pill RM, Hackett P. Professional responses to innovation in clinical method: diabetes care and negotiating skills. Patient Education & Counselling, 1996; 29: 67-73.
33. Butler C, Smithers M, Stott NCH, Peters J. Audit-enhanced district wide primary care for people with diabetes mellitus. Eur J Gen Pract 1997; 3: 23-27.