Contrasting patterns of genetic diversity in neutral markers and agromorphological traits in wild and cultivated populations of Medicago sativa L. from Spain

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 30, Issue SUPPL., 1998, Pages

  Jenczewski, Eric ^a   Angevain, Michel ^a   Charrier, André ^a   Génier, Gérard ^a   Ronfort, Joëlle ^a   Prosperi, Jean Marie ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Gene flow; Genetic diversity; Genetic markers; Medicago sativa

Indexed keywords

ALFALFA; BIODIVERSITY; CONFERENCE PAPER; GENE POOL; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; SPAIN;

EMBRYOPHYTA; MEDICAGO SATIVA;

EID: 0031764076     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/gse:19980706     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. Antonovics J . Bradshaw A.D., Evolution of closely adjacent plant populations. VIII, Clinal patterns at a mine boundary. Heredity 25 (1970) 349-362.
2. Arias D.M., Rieseberg L.H., Gene flow between cultivated and wild sunflowers. Theor. Appl Genet. 89 (1994) 655-660.
3. Barrett S.C.H., Crop mimicry in weeds. Econ. Bot. 37 (1983) 255-282.
4. Barton N.H., Hewitt G.M., Analysis of hybrid zones, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16 (1985) 113-148.
5. Bonnin I., Prosperi J.M., Olivieri I., Genetic markers and quantitative genetic variation in Medicago truncatula (Leguminosae): a comparative analysis of population structure, Genetics 143 (1996) 1795-1805.
6. Crochemore M.L., Huyghe C., Kerlan M.C., Durand F., Julier B., Partitioning and distribution of RAPD variation in a set of populations of the Medicago sativa complex. Agronomie 16 (1996) 421-432.
7. de Wet J.M.J., Harlan J.R., Weeds and domesticates: evolution in man-made habitat, Econ. Bot. 29 (1975) 99-107.
8. Delgado Enguita I., The lucerne in Spain. Characterization of the cultivated and spontaneous ecotypes, in: The Genus Medicago in the Mediterranean Region: Current Situation and Prospects in Research. Hammamet, 19-22 October 1995, 1996, pp. 65-70.
9. Doebley J., Molecular evidence for gene flow among Zea species, Bioscience 40 (1990) 443-448.
10. Ellstrand N.C., Hoffman C.A., Hybridization as an avenue of escape for engineered genes, Bioscience 40 (1990) 438-442.
11. Excoffier L., Smouse P.E., Quattro J.M., Analysis of Molecular Variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data, Genetics 131 (1992) 479-491.
12. Frankelo O.H., Brown A.H.D., Burdon J.J., The Conservation of Plant Biodiversity, Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 1995.
13. Golding G.B., Strobeck C., Increased number of alleles found in hybrid populations due to intragenic recombination. Evolution 37 (1983) 17-29.
14. Harlan J.R., The possible role of weed races in the evolution of cultivated plants, Euphytica 14 (1965) 173-176.
15. Harlan J.R., de Wet J.M.J., Toward a rational classification of cultivated plants. Taxon 20 (1971) 509-517.
16. Harrison R. G., Hybrid zones: windows on evolutionary process, in: Futuyma D., Antonovics J. (Eds.), Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, vol. 7, Oxford University Press, New York, 1990, pp. 69-128.
17. Harrison S., Hastings A., Genetic and evolutionary consequences of metapopulation structure. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11 (1996) 180-183.
18. Heiser C., Introgression re-examined. Bot. Rev. 39 (1973) 347-366.
19. Klinger T., Arriola P.E., Ellstrand N.C., Crop-weed hybridization in radish (Raphanus sativus): effects of distance and population size. Am. J. Bot. 79 (1992) 1431-1435.
20. Langevin S.A., Clay K., Grace J.B., The incidence and effects of hybridization between cultivated rice and its related weed red rice (Oryza sativa L.), Evolution 44 (1990) 1000-1008.
21. Levin D.A., Local differentiation and the breeding structure of plant populations, in: Gottlieb L.D., Jain S.K. (Eds.). Plant Evolutionary Biology, Chapman and Hall, New York, 1988, pp. 305-329.
22. Manasse R.S., Ecological risks of transgenic plants: effects of spatial dispersion on gene flow. Ecol. Appl. 2 (1992) 431-438.
23. McCoy T.J., Echt C.S., Mancino L.C., Segregation of molecular markers supports an allotetraploid structure for Medicago sativa × Medicago papillosa interspecific hybrid. Genome 34 (1991) 574-578
24. Moody M.E., Mueller L.D., Soltis D.E., Genetic variation and random drift in autotetraploid populations. Genetics 134 (1993) 649-657.
25. Nei M., Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70 (1973) 3321-3323.
26. Prosperi J M., Delgado Enguita I., Angevain M., Prospection du genre Medicago en Espagne et au Portugal. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter 78/79 (1989) 27-29.
27. Prosperi J.M., Angevain M., Bonnin I., Chaulet E., Génier G., Jenczewski E., Olivieri I., Ronfort J., Genetic diversity. preservation and use of genetic resources of Mediterranean legumes: alfafa and medics, in: The Genus Medicago in the Mediterranean Region: Current Situation and Prospects in Research, Hammamet, 19-22 October 1995, 1996, pp. 71-89.
28. Raymond M., Rousset F., An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution 49 (1995) 1280-1283.
29. Rieseberg L.H., Ellstrand N.C., What can molecular and morphological markers tell us about plant hybridization? Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 12 (1993) 213-241.
30. Rieseberg L.H., Wendel J.F., Introgression and its consequences in plants, in: Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993. pp. 70-109.
31. Rieseberg L.H., Arias D.M., Ungerer M.C., Linder C.R., Sinervo B., The effects of mating design on introgression between chromosomally divergent sunflower species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93 (1996) 633-644.
32. Robert T., Lespinasse R., Pernès J., Gametophytic competition as influencing gene flow between wild and cultivated forms of pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoides), Genome 34 (1991) 195-200.
33. Saint Amand P.C., Skinner D.Z., Peaden R.N., Risk of alfalfa transgene dissemination and scale dependent effects, in: Report of the Thirty-Fifth North American Alfalfa Improvement Conference, Oklahoma City, 16-20 June 1996, 1996.
34. SAS® Institute Inc., SAS\STAT User's Guide, Version 6, 4th ed., SAS Institute. Cary, NC, 1989.
35. Schoen D., Brown A.H.D., Intraspecific variation in population gene diversity and effective population size correlates with the mating system in plants, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88 (1991) 4494-4497.
36. Slatkin M., Gene flow and the geographic structure of populations, Science 236 (1987) 787-792.
37. Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J., Biometry, 3rd ed., W.H. Freeman and Co., New York, 1995.
38. Stewart C.N. Jr., Excoffier L., Assessing population genetic structure and variability with RAPD data: application to Vaccinium macrocarpon (American Cranberry), J. Evol. Biol. 9 (1996) 153-171.
39. Tai T.H., Tanksley S.D., A rapid inexpensive method for isolation of total DNA from dehydrated plant tissue. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 8 (1990) 297-303.
40. Till-Bottraud I., Reboud X., Brabant P., Lefranc M., Rherissi B., Vedel F., Darmency H., Outcrossing and hybridization in wild and cultivated foxtail millets: consequences for the release of transgenic plants, Theor. Appl. Genet. 83 (1992) 940-946.
41. van Raamsdonk L.W.D., Wild and cultivated plants: the parallelism between evolution and domestication, Evol. Trends Plants 7 (1993) 73-84.
42. Weir B.S., Genetic Data Analysis II. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland. MA, 1996.
43. Weir B.S., Cockerham C.C., Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure, Evolution 38 (1984) 1358-1370.
44. Williams J.G.K., Kubelik A.R., Livak K.J., DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 18 (1991) 6531-6535.
45. Wilson H., Manhart J., Crop/weed gene flow: Chenopodium quinoa Willd. and C. berlandieri Moq., Theor. Appl. Genet. 86 (1993) 642-648.
46. Wilson H.D., Gene flow in squash species. Bioscience 40 (1990) 449-455.
47. Wright S., The genetical structure of populations. Ann. Eugen. 15 (1951) 323-354.
48. Yu K., Pauls K.P., Segregation of random amplified polymorphic DNA markers and strategies for molecular mapping in tetraploid alfalfa. Genome 36 (1993) 844-851.