Is urban sprawl back on the political agenda? Local growth control, regional growth management, and politics

Urban Affairs Review

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 179-212

  Leo, Christopher ^a   Beavis, Mary Ann ^a   Carver, Andrew ^a   Turner, Robyne ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT CONTROL; NOT IN MY BACK YARD RESPONSE; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 0031762333     PISSN: 10780874     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107808749803400201     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Abbott, C., and D. Howe. 1993. The politics of land use law in Oregon: Senate Bill 100, twenty years after. Oregon Historical Quarterly 94 (1): 5-35.
2. Abbott, C., D. Howe, and S. Adler, eds. 1994. Planning the Oregon way: A twenty-year evaluation. Corvallis: Oregon State University.
3. Aiken, J. D. 1989. State farmland preferential assessment statutes. RB-3-0. Agricultural Research Division, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
4. Alexander, D., and R. Tomalty. 1994. Urban policy for sustainable development: Taking a wide-angle view. Winnipeg: Institute of Urban Studies.
5. American Architectural Foundation. 1996. Back from the brink: Saving cities by design [video]. Washington, DC: Author.
6. American Farmland Trust (AFT). 1986. Eroding choices, emerging issues: The condition of California's agricultural land resources. San Francisco: AFT-California Field Office.
7. _. 1996. Putting dollars to work to save farmland: 20 years of PDR programs. American Farmland, Summer, 9-11.
8. Babcock, R. F., and F. P. Bosselman. 1973. Exclusionary zoning: Land use regulation and housing in the 1970s. New York: Praeger.
9. Baldassare, M. 1986. Trouble in paradise: The suburban transformation in America. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
10. Bank of America. 1995. Beyond sprawl: New patterns of growth to fit the new California. San Francisco: Author, [downloaded 12 July 1996]. Available from http://www.bankamerica. com/community/comm_env_urban1.html.
11. Barrows, R., and E. Troutt. 1989. National concerns over urbanization of rural land. In Land use transition in urbanizing areas: Research and information needs, edited by R. Heimlich, 1-14. Proceedings of the USDA-ERS and the Farm Foundation Workshop, Washington DC.
12. Beatley, T. 1995. Habitat conservation plans: A new tool to resolve land use conflicts. Landlines 7 (5): 6-7.
13. Beavis, M. A. 1991. Stewardship, planning and public policy. Plan Canada 31 (6): 75-82.
14. Beavis, M. A., and J. Patterson. 1992. A select, annotated bibliography on sustainable cities. Winnipeg: Institute of Urban Studies.
15. Bills, N. L. 1996. Farmland preservation: Agricultural districts, right to farm laws and related legislation (Staff Paper No. 96-01). Department of Agricultural, Resource, and Managerial Economics, Cornell University.
16. Bills, N. L., and N. Williams. 1991. Protecting farmland: State funded purchase of development rights (PDR) programs in the Northeast. Policy Issues in Rural Land Use 4(1). 1-3.
17. Blais, P. 1995. The economics of urban form. Background paper, Greater Toronto Area Task Force.
18. Buist, H., C. Fischer, J. Michos, and A. Tegene. 1995. Purchase of development rights and the economics of easements. AER-718, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
19. The costs of sprawl: Does growth management pay? 1996. CUPR Report 7 (3) [downloaded 20 February 1997]. Available from http://policy.rutgers.edu/cupr/CUPReport73/sprawl.htm.
20. Coughlin, R. E., et al. 1977. Saving the garden: The preservation of farmland and other environmentally valuable land. Philadelphia: Regional Science Research Institute.
21. Crerar, A. D. 1989. The sustainable city. Policy Options, March, 3-5.
22. Cullingworth, B. 1987. Urban and regional planning in Canada. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
23. DeGrove, J., and R. Turner. 1998. Local government in Florida: Coping with massive and sustained growth. In Government and politics in Florida, 2d ed., edited by R. Huckshorn, 169-92. Gainesville: Univ. of Florida Press.
24. DeGrove, J. M., with D. Miness. 1992. The new frontier for land policy: Planning and growth management in the states. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
25. Des Rosiers, F. 1992. Urban sprawl and the central city. Plan Canada, November, 14-18.
26. Downs, A. 1988. The real problem with suburban anti-growth policies. Brookings Review 6 (2): 23-29.
27. _. 1994. New visions for metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
28. Egan, T. 1996. Drawing the hard line on urban sprawl. The New York Times, 30 December, A1.
29. Ehrenhalt, A. 1997. The great wall of Portland. Governing [downloaded 20 November 1997]. Available from http://www.governing.com/5growth.htm.
30. Engwicht, D. 1993. Reclaiming our cities and towns: Better living with less traffic. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
31. Fischel, W. A. 1990. Do growth controls matter? A review of empirical evidence on the effectiveness and efficiency of local government land use regulation. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
32. Freund, P., and G. Martin. 1993. The ecology of the automobile. Montreal: Black Rose.
33. Garreau, J. 1991. Edge city. New York: Doubleday.
34. Gordon, D., ed. 1990. Green cities: Ecologically sound approaches to urban space. Montreal: Black Rose.
35. Greater Toronto Area (GTA) Task Force. 1996. Report. Toronto: Queen's Printer for Ontario.
36. Grossi, R. E. 1993. A green revolution: Retooling agricultural policy for greater sustainability. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 48 (4): 285-88.
37. Ha, T. T. 1997. Politicians will try to fill in the doughnut. Globe and Mail, 25 February, A2.
38. Haar, C. M., S. G. Horowitz, and D. F. Katz. 1980. Transfer of development rights: A primer. Policy Analysis Series Number 206. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
39. Hales, C. A. 1991. Higher density + certainty = affordable housing for Portland, Oregon. Urban Land, 12 September, 12-15.
40. Heimlich, R. E., and D. H. Brooks. 1989. Metropolitan growth and agriculture: Farming in the city's shadow. AER-619. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
41. Heimlich, R. E., and K. S. Krupa. 1994. Changes in land quality accompanying urbanization in U.S. fast-growth counties. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 49 (4): 367-74.
42. Hough, M. 1984. City form and natural process: Towards a new urban vernacular. London: Croom Helm.
43. Knaap, G., and A. C. Nelson. 1992. The regulated landscape: Lessons on state land use planning from Oregon. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
44. Langdon, P. 1992. How Portland does it. Atlantic, November, 134-41.
45. Laviolette, T. 1993. Twentieth anniversary of the Agricultural Land Review. City Magazine 14 (3): 13.
46. Leo, C. 1995. The state in the city: A political economy perspective on growth and decay. In Canadian metropolitics: Governing our cities, edited by J. Lightbody. Toronto: Copp Clark.
47. _. Regional growth management regime: The case of Portland, Oregon. Forthcoming/Journal of Urban Affairs.
48. Leonard, H. J. 1983. Managing Oregon's growth: The politics of development planning. Washington, DC: Conservation Foundation.
49. Lewis, P. G. 1996. Shaping suburbia: How political institutions organize urban development. Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh.
50. Logan, J. R., and M. Zhou. 1989. Do suburban growth controls control growth? American Sociological Review 54 (June):461-71.
51. Lynn, M., and K. Matthews. 1991. Super cities. Kiplinger's Personal Finance Magazine, 25 October, 42-43.
52. Mallach, A. 1984. Inclusionary housing programs: Policies and practices. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University.
53. Mantell, M. A., S. F. Harper, and L. Propst, eds. 1990. Creating successful communities: A guidebook to growth management strategies. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation.
54. McHarg, I. L. 1969. Design with nature. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.
55. Mollison, B. 1988. Permaculture: A designer's manual. Tyalgum, Australia: Tagari Publications.
56. National Agricultural Lands Study (NALS). 1981. Final report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
57. Newman, P. 1991. Sustainable cities: Restoring the commons. The Urban Ecologist, Fall, 3.
58. Newman, P.W.G., and J. R. Kenworthy. 1989. Cities and automobile dependence. Brookfield, VT: Gower Technical.
59. Nicholson-Lord, D. 1997. The greening of the cities. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
60. Noyelle, T. J., and T. M. Stanback. 1984. Economic transformation of American cities. Totowa, NJ: Allanheld & Rowman.
61. Office of State Planning, New Jersey. 1997a. The New Jersey state development and redevelopment plan [downloaded 20 February 1997]. Available from http://www.state.nj.us/ osp/ospplan2.htm.
62. _. 1997b. The New Jersey state development and redevelopment plan: Impact assessment study [downloaded 20 Febraury 1997]. Available from http://www.state.nj.us/osp/ospimpac.htm.
63. Orfield, M. 1997. Metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
64. Patterson, J. 1998. Testing the partnership model of growth management. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal, March.
65. Peddle, M. T. 1997a. The effects of growth management policies on agricultural land values. Working Paper CAE/WP 97-7. DeKalb, IL: American Farmland Trust Center for Agriculture in the Environment.
66. _. 1997b. Land value, agricultural land conversion, and the choice of local growth management tools. Proceedings of the American Farmland Trust Workshop, "Competition for the Land."
67. Perkins, R. 1993. What's happening in the suburbs of Greater Vancouver? City Magazine 14 (3).
68. Planners' web: Sprawl resource guide. 1997. Planning Commissioners Journal [downloaded 10 December 1997]. Available from http://www. plannersweb.com/sprawl/sprawl6.html.
69. Real Estate Research Corporation. 1974. The cost of sprawl: Environmental and economic costs of alternative residential development patterns at the urban fringe. Washington, DC: Author.
70. Rees, W. E., and M. Roseland. 1991. Sustainable communities: Planning for the 21st century. Plan Canada 31 (3): 15-26.
71. Rosen, K. T., and L. F. Katz. 1981. Growth management and land use controls: The San Francisco Bay Area experience. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association 9(3): 321-44.
72. Roth, B. 1994. Living earless in a carcrushed world. The Trumpeter 11 (1): 32-34.
73. Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront. 1992. Regeneration: Toronto's waterfront and the sustainable city: Final report. Toronto: Queen's Printer of Ontario.
74. Rusk, D. 1993. Cities without suburbs. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
75. San Jose Department of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement. 1996. General plan annual review report. Reference Nos. GP96-UGB & GP96-T-3. San Jose, CA: Author.
76. Savitch, H. V., and R. K. Vogel. 1996. Regional patterns in a post-city age. In Regional politics: America in a post-city age, edited by H. V. Savitch and R. K. Vogel. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
77. Schnidman, F., M. Smiley, and E. G. Woodbury. 1990. Retention of land for agriculture: Policy, practice and potential in New England. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
78. Spirn, A. W. 1984. The granite garden: Urban nature and human design. New York: Basic Books.
79. Sustainable cities. 1992. Winnipeg: Institute of Urban Studies.
80. Todd, N. J., and J. Todd. 1984. Bioshelters, ocean arks, city farming: Ecology as the basis of design. San Francisco: Sierra Club.
81. Tomalty, R., S. Hendler, and K. Flick. 1994. Planning for sustainable urban development. Winnipeg: Institute of Urban Studies.
82. Town planning: Where it works. 1990. The Economist, 1 September, 24-25.
83. Turner, R. S. 1990. New rules for the growth game: The use of rational state standards in land use policy. Journal of Urban Affairs 12 (1): 35-47.
84. United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (UNCHS). 1990. Human settlements and sustainable development: The role of human settlements and of human settlement policies in meeting government goals and in addressing the issues of sustainability at global and local levels. Nairobi, Kenya: Author.
85. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Soil Conservation Service. 1990. The second RCA appraisal: Soil, water, and related resources on nonfederal land in the United States - Analysis of conditions and trends. Misc. Pub. No. 1482. Washington, DC: Author.
86. Vandeman, M. 1991. Auto-free cities. The Urban Ecologist, Summer, 1.
87. Vesterby, M., R. E. Heimlich, and K. S. Krupa. 1994. Urbanization of rural land in the United States. AER-673. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
88. Warren, C. L., A. Kerr, and A. M. Turner. 1989. Urbanization of rural land in Canada, 1981-86. SOE Fact Sheet No. 89-1, Environment Canada.
89. Weiss, M. A. 1987. The rise of the community builders: The American real estate industry and urban land planning. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
90. Wheeler, S. 1991. Can the Bay Area stop sprawl? The Urban Ecologist, Spring, 13.
91. _. 1992. Planning bicycle-friendly cities. The Urban Ecologist, Winter, 1, 12.
92. When city hall learns to think like a business. 1991. Business Week, 25 October, 136.
93. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). 1987. Our common future. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.