Functional restoration and other rehabilitation approaches to chronic musculoskeletal pain disability syndromes

Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 209-221

  Mayer, Tom G ^a   Polatin, Peter B ^b   Gatchel, Robert J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Functional restoration; Physical deconditioning; Quantification of function; Tertiary care

Indexed keywords

CHRONIC PAIN; DISABILITY; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE; PAIN; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; WORKMAN COMPENSATION;

EID: 0031760434     PISSN: 08962960     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1615/CritRevPhysRehabilMed.v10.i3.10     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. van Tulder, M., Koes, B., and Bouter, L., Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions, SPINE, 22, 2128, 1997.
2. Rainville, J., Sobel, J., Hartigan, C., and Wright, A., The effect of compensation involvement on the reporting of pain and disability by patients referred for rehabilitation of chronic low back pain, SPINE, 22, 2016, 1997.
3. Greenough, C. and Fraser, R., The effects of compensation on recovery from low back injury, SPINE, 14, 947, 1989.
4. Hadler, N., Carey, T., and Garrett, J., The influence of indemnification by workers' compensation insurance on recovery from acute backache, SPINE, 20, 2710, 1995.
5. Sanderson, P., Todd, B., Holt, G., and Getty, C., Compensation, work status, and disability in low back pain patients, SPINE, 20, 554, 1995.
6. Polatin, P., Kinney, R., Gatchel, R., Lillo, E., and Mayer, T., Psychiatric illness and chronic low back pain: the mind and the spine - which goes first? SPINE, 18, 66, 1993.
7. Gatchel, R., Mayer, T., Hazard, R., Rainville, J., and Mooney, V., Editorial: functional restoration. Pitfalls in evaluating efficacy, SPINE, 17, 988, 1992.
8. Hazard, R., Spine update: functional restoration, SPINE, 20, 2345, 1995.
9. Hazard, R., Fenwick, J., Kalish, S., Redmond, J., Reeves, G., Reid, S., and Frymoyer, J., Functional restoration with behavioral support: a one-year perspective study of chronic low back pain patients, SPINE, 14, 157, 1989.
10. Mayer, T., Gatchel, R., Mayer, H., Kishino, N., Keeley, J., and Mooney, V., A prospective two-year study of functional restoration in industrial low back injury: an objective assessment procedure, JAMA, 258, 1763, 1987.
11. McMahon, M., Gatchel, R., Polatin, P., and Mayer, T., Early childhood abuse in chronic spinal disorder patient: a major barrier to treatment success, SPINE, 22, 2408, 1997.
12. Turner, J., Ersek, M., Herron, et al., Patient outcomes after lumbar spinal fusions, JAMA, 268, 907, 1992.
13. Mayer, T., Kondraske, G., Beals, S., and Gatchel, R., Spinal range of motion: accuracy and sources of error with inclinometric measurement, SPINE, 22, 1976, 1997.
14. Adams, M., Dolan, P., Marks, C., and Hutton, C., An electroinclinometer technique for measuring lumbar curvature, Clin. Biomech., 1, 130, 1986.
15. American Medical Association Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 3rd ed., revised, AMA Press, Chicago, 1990.
16. American Medical Association Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 4th ed., Doege, T., Ed., AMA Press, Chicago, IL, 1993.
17. Keeley, J., Mayer, T., Cox, R., Gatchel, R., Smith, J., and Mooney, V., Quantification of lumbar function. Part 5. Reliability of range of motion measures in the sagittal plane and an in vivo torso rotation measurement technique, SPINE, 11, 31, 1986.
18. Loebl, W., Measurements of spinal posture and range in spinal movements, Ann. Phys. Med., 9, 103, 1967.
19. Mayer, T., Barnes, D., Kishino, N., Nichols, G., Gatchel, R., Mayer, H., and Mooney, V., Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation. I. An erratum, SPINE, 15, 5, 1990.
20. Mayer, T., Tencer, A., Kristoferson, S., and Mooney, Use of noninvasive techniques for quantification of spinal range-of-motion in normal subjects and chronic low-back dysfunction patients, SPINE, 9, 588, 1984.
21. Reynolds, P., Measurement of spinal mobility: acomparison of three methods, Rheum. Rehabil., 14, 180, 1975.
22. Mayer, T., Pope, P., Tabor, J., Bovasso, E., and Gatchel, R., Physical progress and residual impairment quantification after functional restoration. Part I. Lumbar mobility, SPINE, 19, 389, 1994.
23. Mayer, T., Gatchel, R., Keeley, J., and Mayer, H., Optimum spinal strength normalization factors among male railroad workers, SPINE, 18, 239, 1993.
24. Mayer, T., Gatchel, R., Keeley, J., Mayer, H., and Richling, D., A male incumbent worker industrial database. Part 1. Lumbar spinal physical capacity, SPINE, 19, 755, 1994.
25. Mayer, T., Brady, S., Bovasso, E., Pope, P., and Gatchel, R., Noninvasive measurement of cervical triplanar motion in normal subjects, SPINE, 18, 2191, 1993.
26. Waddell, G., Somerville, D., Henderson, I., and Newton, M., Objective clinical evaluation of physical impairment in chronic low back pain, SPINE, 17, 617, 1992.
27. Pederson, O., Peterson, R., and Staffeldt, E., Back pain and isometric back muscle strength of workers in a Danish factory, Scand. J. Rehabil. Med., 7, 125, 1975.
28. Davies, G. and Gould, J., Trunk testing using a prototype Cybex II isokinetic stabilization system, J. Orthoped. Sports Phys. Ther., 3, 164, 1982.
29. Delitto, A., Crandell, C., and Rose, S., Peak torque to body weight ratios in the trunk: a critical analysis, Phys. Ther., 69, 138, 1989.
30. Hazard, R., Reid, S., Fenwick, J., and Reeves, J., Isokinetic trunk and lifting strength measurements: variability as an indicator of effort, SPINE, 13, 54, 1988.
31. Mayer, T., Smith, S., Keeley, J., and Mooney, V., Quantification of lumbar function. Part 2. Sagittal plane trunk strength in chronic low back pain patients, SPINE, 10, 765, 1985.
32. Mayer, T., Smith, S., Kondraske, G., Gatchel, R., Carmichael, T., and Mooney, V., Quantification of lumbar function. Part 3. Preliminary data on isokinetic torso rotation testing with myoelectric spectral analysis in normal and low back pain subjects, SPINE, 10, 912, 1985.
33. Smidt, G. and Blantied, P., Analysis of strength tests and resistive exercises commonly used for low-back disorders, SPINE, 12, 1025, 1987.
34. Smith, S., Mayer, T., Gatchel, R., and Becker, T., Quantification of lumbar function. Part 1. Isometric and multi-speed isokinetic trunk strength measures in sagittal and axial planes in normal subject patients, SPINE, 10, 757, 1985.
35. Thompson, N., Gould, J., Davies, G., Ross, D., and Price, S., Descriptive measures of isokinetic trunk testing, J. Orthoped. Sports Phys. Ther., 7, 43, 1985.
36. Thorstensson, A. and Nilsson, J., Trunk muscle strength during constant and velocity movement, Scand. J. Rehabil. Med., 14, 61, 1982.
37. Newton, M. and Waddell, G., Trunk strength testing with iso-machines. Part 1. Review of a decade of scientific evidence, SPINE, 7, 801, 1993.
38. Newton, M., Thow, N., Somerville, D., Henderson, I., and Waddell, G., Trunk strength testing with isomachines. Part 2. Experimental evaluation of the Cybex II back testing system in normal subjects and patients with chronic low back pain, SPINE, 7, 812, 1993.
39. Brady, S., Mayer, T., and Gatchel, R., Physical progress and residual impairment quantification after functional restoration. Part 2. Isokinetic trunk strength, SPINE, 18, 395, 1994.
40. Mayer, T., Gatchel, R., Keeley, J., Mayer, H., and Richling, D., A male incumbent worker industrial database. Part 2. Cervical spinal physical capacity, SPINE, 19, 762, 1994.
41. Langrana, N. and Lee, C., Isokinetic evaluation of trunk muscles, SPINE, 9, 171, 1984.
42. Marras, W., King, A., and Joynt, R., Measurements of loads on the lumbar spine under isometric and isokinetic conditions, SPINE, 9, 175, 1984.
43. Mellin, G., Measurement of thoracolumbar posture and mobility with Myrin inclinometer, SPINE, 22, 2408, 1997.
44. Mayer, T., Barnes, D., Kishino, N., Nichols, G., Gatchel, R., Mayer, H., and Mooney, V., Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation. Part 1. A standardized protocol and normative database, SPINE, 13, 993, 1988.
45. Mayer, T., Barnes, D., Nichols, G., Kishino, N., Coval, K., Piel, B., Hoshino, D., and Gatchel, R., Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation. Part 2. A comparison with isokinetic lifting in a disabled chronic low back pain industrial population, SPINE, 13, 998, 1988.
46. Chaffin, D., Human strength capability and low back pain, J. Occup. Med., 16, 248, 1974.
47. Chaffin, D., Herrin, G., and Keyserling, W., Pre-employment strength testing: an updated position, J. Occup. Med., 20, 403, 1978.
48. Kishino, N., Mayer, T., Gatchel, R., Parrish, M., Anderson, C., Gustin, L., and Mooney, V., Quantification of lumbar function. Part 4. Isometric and isokinetic lifting simulation in normal subjects and low back dysfunction patients, SPINE, 10, 921, 1985.
49. Mayer, T. and Gatchel, R., Functional restoration for spinal disorders: the sports medicine approach, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA, 1988.
50. Porterfield, J., Mostardi, R., King, S., Ariki, P., Moats, E., and Noe, D., Simulated lift testing using computerized isokinetics, SPINE, 12, 683, 1987.
51. Mayer, T., Gatchel, R., Keeley, J., Mayer, H., and Richling, D., A male incumbent worker industrial database. Part 3. Lumbar/cervical functional testing, SPINE, 19, 765, 1994.
52. Curtis, L., Mayer, T., and Gatchel, R., Physical progress and residual impairment after functional restoration. Part 3. Isokinetic and isoinertial lifting capacity, SPINE, 18, 401, 1994.
53. Cady, L., Bischoff, D., O'Connel, E., Thomas, P., and Allan, J., Strength and fitness and subsequent back injuries in firefighters, J. Occup. Med., 21, 269, 1979.
54. Schmidt, A., Cognitive factors in the performance level of chronic low back pain patients, J. Psychosomat. Res., 29, 183, 1985.
55. Bigos, S., Spengler, D., Martin, N., Zeh, J., Fisher, L., Nachemson, A., and Wang, M., Back injuries in industry: a retrospective study II. Injury factors, SPINE, 11, 246, 1986.
56. Bigos, S., Spengler, D., Martin, N., Zeh, J., Fisher, L., Nachemson, A., and Wang, M., Back injuries in industry: a retrospective study III. Employee-related factors, SPINE, 11, 252, 1986.
57. Spengler, D., Bigos, S., Martin, N., Zeh, J., Fisher, L., and Nachemson, A., Back injuries in industry: a retrospective study I. Overview and cost analysis, SPINE, 11, 241, 1986.
58. Nachemson, A., Work for all, Clin. Orthoped. Rel. Res., 179, 77, 1983.
59. Gatchel, R., Mayer, T., Capra, P., Diamond, P., and Barnett, J., Quantification of lumbar function. Part 6. The use of psychological measures in guiding physical functional restoration, SPINE, 11, 36, 1986.
60. Million, R., Haavik, N., Jayson, M., and Baiser, R., Evaluation of low back pain and assessment of lumbar corsets with and without back support, Ann. Rheum. Dis., 40, 449, 1981.
61. Mooney, V., Cairns, D., and Robertson, J., A system for evaluating and treating chronic back disability, West. J. Med., 124, 370, 1976.
62. Gatchel, R., Psychological disorders and chronic pain: cause and effect relationships, in Psychological Approaches to Pain Management: A Practitioner's Guide, Gatchel, R. J. and Turk, D. C., Eds., Guilford Publications, New York, 1996.
63. Beck, A., Steer, R., and Garbin, W., Psychometric properties ofthe beck depression inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation, Clin. Psychol. Rev., 8, 77, 1988.
64. Kinney, R., Gatchel, R., Polatin, P., Fogarty, W., and Mayer, T., Prevalence of psychopathology in acute and chronic low back pain patients, J. Occup. Rehabil., 3, 95, 1993.
65. Faas, A., Van Eijk, J., Chavannes, A., and Gubbels, J., A randomized trial of exercise therapy in patients with acute low back pain, SPINE, 20, 941, 1995.
66. Stuckey, S., Jacobs, A., and Goldfarb, J., EMG biofeedback training, relaxation training, and placebo for the relief of chronic back pain, Percept. Motor Skills, 63, 1023, 1986.
67. Beals, R., Compensation and recovery from injury, West. J. Med., 104, 233, 1984.
68. Dzioba, R. and Doxey, N., A prospective investigation into the orthopedic and psychologic predictors of outcome of first lumbar surgery following industrial injury, SPINE, 9, 614, 1984.
69. Fordyce, W., Roberts, A., and Sternbach, R., The behavioral management of chronic pain: a response to critics, Pain, 22, 112, 1985.
70. Jackson, R., Boston, D., and Edge, A., Lateral mass fusion: a prospective study of a consecutive series with long-term follow-up, SPINE, 10, 828, 1983.
71. Mayer, T., Gatchel, R., Kishino, N., Keeley, J., Mayer, H., Capra, P., and Mooney, V., A prospective short-term study of chronic low back pain patients utilizing novel objective functional measurement, Pain, 25, 53, 1986.
72. Kohles, S., Barnes, D., Gatchel, R., and Mayer, T., Improved physical performance outcomes following functional restoration treatment in patient with chronic low back pain: early vs. recent training results, SPINE, 15, 1321, 1990.
73. Mayer, T., Gatchel, R., Kishino, N., Keeley, J., Capra, P., Mayer, H., Barnett, J., and Mooney, V., Objective assessment of spine function following industrial injury: a prospective study with comparison group and one-year follow-up, 1985 Volvo Award in Clinical Sciences, SPINE, 10, 482, 1985.
74. Hazard, R., Haugh, L., Reid, S., McFarlane, G., and MacDonald, R., Early physician notification of patient disability risk and clinical guidelines after low back injury: a randomized, controlled trial, SPINE, 22, 2951, 1997.
75. Mooney, V. and Robertson, J., The facet syndrome, Clin. Orthoped., 115, 149, 1976.
76. Ward, N., Tricyclic antidepressants for chronic low back pain: mechanisms of action and predictors of response, 1986 Volvo Award in Clinical Sciences, SPINE, 11, 661, 1986.
77. Mayer, T., McMahon, M., Gatchel, R., Sparks, B., Wright, A., and Pegues, P., Socioeconomic outcomes of combined spine surgery and functional restoration in workers' compensation spinal disorders with matched controls, SPINE, 23, 598, 1998.
78. Jordan, K., Mayer, T., and Gatchel, R., Should extended disability be an exclusion criterion for tertiary rehabilitation: socioeconomic outcomes of early vs. late functional restoration in compensation spinal disorders, in press.
79. Fishbain, D., Rosomoff, H., Goldbert, M., Cutler, R., Abdel Moty, E., Khalil, T., and Rosomoff, R., The prediction of return to the workplace after multidisciplinary pain center treatment, Clin. J. Pain, 9, 3, 1993.
80. Garcy, P., Mayer, T., and Gatchel, R., Recurrent or new injury outcomes after return to work in chronic disabling disorders: tertiary prevention efficacy of functional restoration treatment, SPINE, 21, 952, 1996.