Combined MRI and CFD analysis of fully developed steady and pulsatile laminar flow through a bend

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 1158-1171

  Weston, S J ^d   Wood, N B ^b,c   Tabor, G ^a   Gosman, A D ^a   Firmin, D N ^b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL BROMPTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d Icon Computer Graphics Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Comparative studies; Computational fluid dynamics; Evaluation; Flow phantoms; MRI; Phase imaging

Indexed keywords

AORTA; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; LAMINAR FLOW; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSATILE FLOW; SHEAR STRESS;

AORTA, THORACIC; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PULSATILE FLOW; RHEOLOGY;

EID: 0031759398     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880080523     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Fei D-Y, Kraft KA, Fatouros PP. Model studies of nonsteady flow using magnetic resonance imaging. ASME J Biomech Eng 1990; 112:93-99.
2. Firmin DN, Nayler GL, Klipstein RH, Underwood SR, Rees RSO, Longmore DB. In vivo validation of MR velocity imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987; 11:751-756.
3. Ku DN, Biancheri CL, Pettigrew RI, Peifer JW, Markou CP, Engels H. Evaluation of magnetic resonance velocimetry for steady flow. ASME J Biomech Eng 1990; 112:464-472.
4. Sun Y, Hearshen DO, Rankin GW, Haggar AM. Comparison of velocity-encoded MR imaging and fluid dynamic modelling of steady and disturbed flow. J Magn Reson Imaging 1992; 2:443-452.
5. Pedley TJ. The fluid mechanics of large blood vessels. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1980.
6. Nerem RM, Seed WA, Wood NB. An experimental study of the velocity distribution and transition to turbulence in the aorta. J Fluid Mech 1972; 52:137-160.
7. Nakano A, Taneshita K. The process of transition to turbulence in an oscillatory turbulent pipe flow. In: Advances in Bioengineering. ASME BED-22; 1992:529-532.
8. Taylor G I. The criterion for turbulence in curved pipes. Proc R Soc Lond A 1929; 124:243-249.
9. Axel L, McClean M, Tarnawski M, Doorly DJ, Dumoulin C, Caro CG. Magnetic resonance imaging of helical flows. In: Proceedings of the 4th annual scientific meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. New York: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1996.
10. Nikuradse J. Gesetzmässigkeit der turbulenten Strömung in glatten Rohren. Forschg Arb Ing-Wes 1932; 356.
11. Wood NB. Development of hot film anemometry for measurement of blood velocity profiles in arteries. Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial College, London, 1971.
12. Langhaar HL. Steady flow in the transition length of a straight tube. J Appl Mech 1942; 9:A55-A58.
13. He X, Ku DN. Unsteady entrance flow development in a straight tube. ASME J Biomech Eng 1994; 116:355-360.
14. Dean WR. The streamline motion of a fluid in a curved pipe. Phil Mag 1927; 4:208-223.
15. Dean WR. The streamline motion of a fluid in a curved pipe. Phil Mag 1928; 5:673-695.
16. Bryant DJ, Payne JA, Firmin DN, Longmore DB. Measurement of flow with NMR imaging using a gradient pulse and phase difference technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984; 8:588-593.
17. Nayler GL, Firmin DN, Longmore DB. Blood flow imaging by cine magnetic resonance. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986; 10: 715-722.
18. Caretto LS, Gosman AD, Patankar SV, Spalding DB. Two calculation procedures for steady, three-dimensional flows with recirculation. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Numerical Methods and Fluid Dynamics. Paris: International Conference on Numerical Methods and Fluid Dynamics, 1972.
19. Patankar SV. Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
20. Issa RI. Solution of implicitly discretized fluid flow equations by operator splitting. J Comput Phys 1986; 62:40-65.
21. Issa RI, Gosman AD, Watkins AP. The computation of compressible and incompressible recirculating flows by a non-iterative implicit scheme. J Comput Phys 1986; 62:66-82.
22. Sun H, Kuban BD, Schmalbrock P, Friedman MH. Measurement of the geometric parameters of the aortic bifurcation from magnetic resonance images. Ann Biomed Eng 1994; 22:229-239.
23. Olson DE. Fluid mechanics relevant to respiration-flow within curved or elliptical tubes and bifurcating systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial College, London, 1971.
24. Womersley JR. Method for the calculation of velocity, rate of flow and viscous drag in arteries when the pressure gradient is known. J Physiol 1955; 127:553-563.
25. Chang L-J, Tarbell JM. Numerical simulation of fully developed sinusoidal and pulsatile (physiological) flow in curved tubes. J Fluid Mech 1985; 161:175-198.
26. Tada S, Oshima S, Yamane R. Classification of pulsating flow in curved pipes. ASME J Biomech Eng 1996; 118:311-317.