Response of small mammals to clearcutting, burning, and glyphosate application in the Oregon Coast Range

Journal of Wildlife Management

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 1207-1216

  Cole, Elizabeth C ^a   McComb, William C ^b   Newton, Michael ^a   Leeming, J P ^a   Chambers, Carol L ^a,c  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^c School of Forestry   (United States)

Author keywords

Alnus rubra; Burning; Clearcutting; Forest habitat; Glyphosate application; Red alder; Riparian; Small mammals; Vegetation management

Indexed keywords

BUFFER ZONE; COMMUNITY RESPONSE; FOREST MANAGEMENT; MAMMAL;

OREGON; OREGON COAST RANGE; UNITED STATES;

ALNUS RUBRA; MICROTUS OREGONI; PEROMYSCUS MANICULATUS; SOREX PACIFICUS; SOREX TROWBRIDGII; SOREX VAGRANS; TAMIAS TOWNSENDII;

EID: 0031757691     PISSN: 0022541X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3801984     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. AHLGREN, C. E. 1966. Small mammals and reforestation following prescribed burning. Journal of Forestry 64:614-618.
2. ANTHONY, R. G., AND M. L. MORRISON. 1985. Influence of glyphosate herbicide on small mammal populations in western Oregon. Northwest Science 59:159-168.
3. BORRECCO, J. E., H. C. BLACK, AND E. F. HOOVEN. 1979. Response of small mammals to herbicideinduced habitat changes. Northwest Science 53: 97-106.
4. BROWN, E. R., editor. 1985. Management of wildlife and fish habitats in forests of western Oregon and Washington. U.S. Forest Service Publication R6-F & WL-192-1985.
5. CORN, P. S., AND R. B. BURY. 1991. Small mammal communities in the Oregon Coast Range. Pages 241-254 in L. F. Ruggiero, K. B. Aubry, A. B. Carey, and M. H. Huff, technical coordinators. Wildlife and vegetation of unmanaged Douglasfir forests. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-285.
6. CROSS, S. P. 1985. Responses of small mammals to forest riparian perturbations. Pages 269-275 in R. R. Johnson, C. D. Ziebell, D. R. Patton, P. F. Folliott, and R. H. Hamre, technical editors. Riparian ecosystems and their management: reconciling conflicting uses. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report RM-120.
7. _. 1988. Riparian systems and small mammals and bats. Pages 93-112 in K. J. Raedeke, editor. Streamside management: riparian wildlife and forestry interactions. University of Washington Institute of Forest Resources Contribution 59.
8. D'ANIERI, P., D. M. LESLIE, JR., AND M. L. MCCORMACK, JR. 1987. Small mammals in glyphosatetreated clearcuts in northern Maine. Canadian Field-Naturalist 101:547-550.
9. DOYLE, A. T. 1990. Use of riparian and upslope habitats by small mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 71:14-23.
10. FITTS, K. M., AND P. T. NORTHEN. 1991. Small mammal populations in clearcut areas of the Jackson Demonstration State Forest, Mendocino County, California. California Department of Fish and Game Technical Report.
11. FREEDMAN, B., A. M. POIRIER, R. MORASH, AND F. SCOTT. 1988. Effects of the herbicide 2,4,5-T on the habitat and abundance of breeding birds and small mammals of a conifer clearcut in Nova Scotia. Canadian Field-Naturalist 102:6-11.
12. GALINDO, C., AND C. J. KREBS. 1985. Habitat use and abundance of deer mice: interactions with meadow voles and red-backed voles. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63:1870-1879.
13. GASHWILER, J. S. 1970. Plant and mammal changes on a clearcut in west-central Oregon. Ecology 51: 1018-1026.
14. GOMEZ, D. M. 1993. Small mammal and herpetofauna abundance in riparian and upslope areas of five forest conditions. Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
15. HOOVEN, E. F. 1973. Response of the Oregon creeping vole to the clearcutting of a Douglas-fir forest. Northwest Science 47:256-264.
16. _, AND H. C. BLACK. 1976. Effects of some clearcutting practices on small mammal populations in western Oregon. Northwest Science 50: 189-208.
17. JOHNSON, D. R., AND R. M. HANSEN. 1969. Effects of range treatment with 2,4-D on rodent populations. Journal of Wildlife Management 33:125-132.
18. KIRKLAND, G. L., JR. 1977. Responses of small mammals to the clearcutting of northern Appalachian forests. Journal of Mammalogy 58:600-609.
19. LAUTENSCHLAGER, R. A. 1993a. Response of wildlife to forest herbicide applications in northern coniferous ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23:2286-2299.
20. _. 1993b. Effects of conifer release with herbicides on wildlife. (A review with an emphasis on Ontario's forests). Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Forest Research Information Paper 111.
21. LITTLE, T. M., AND F. J. HILLS. 1978. Agricultural experimentation: design and analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.
22. MARTELL, A. M. 1983. Changes in small mammal communities after logging in north-central Ontario. Canadian Journal of Zoology 61:970-980.
23. _, AND A. RADVANYI. 1977. Changes in small mammal populations after clearcutting of northern Ontario black spruce forest. Canadian Field-Naturalist 91:41-46.
24. MCCOMB, W. C. 1994. Red alder: interactions with wildlife. Pages 131-138 in D. E. Hibbs, D. S. DeBell, and R. F. Tarrant, editors. Biology and management of red alder. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
25. _, C. L. CHAMBERS, AND M. NEWTON. 1993a. Small mammal and amphibian communities and habitat associations in red alder stands, central Oregon Coast Ranee. Northwest Science 67: 181-188.
26. _, K. MCGARIGAL, AND R. G. ANTHONY. 1993b. Small mammal and amphibian abundance in streamside and upslope habitats of mature Douglas-fir stands, western Oregon. Northwest Science 67:7-15.
27. MEDIN, D. E. 1986. Small mammal responses to diameter-cut logging in an Idaho Douglas-fir forest. U.S. Forest Service Research Note INT-362.
28. MILLIKEN, G. A., AND D. E. JOHNSON. 1992. Analysis of messy data. Volume 1. Designed experiments. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, New York, USA.
29. NELSON, L., JR., AND F. W. CLARK. 1973. Correction for sprung traps in catch/effort calculations of trapping results. Journal of Mammalogy 54:295-298.
30. NEWTON, M., E. C. COLE, D. E. WHITE, AND M. L. MCCORMICK, JR. 1992. Young spruce-fir forests released by herbicides. I. Response of hardwoods and shrubs. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 9:126-130.
31. _, K. M. HOWARD, B. R. KELPSAS, R. DANHAUS, C. M. LOTTMAN, AND S. DUBELMAN. 1984. Fate of glyphosate in an Oregon forest eco-system. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 32:1144-1151.
32. OLORUNSOGO, O. O., E. A. BABABUNMI, AND O. BASSIR. 1979. Effect of glyphosate on rat liver mitochondria in vivo. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 22:357-364.
33. PETTICREW, B. G., AND R. M. F. SADLEIR. 1974. The ecology of the deer mouse Peromyscus maniculatus in a coastal coniferous forest. I. Population dynamics. Canadian Journal of Zoology 52:107-118.
34. POWELL, D. S., J. L. FAULKNER, D. R. DARR, Z. ZHU, AND D. W. MACCLEARY. 1992. Forest resources of the United States. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report RM-234.
35. RITCHIE, D. C., A. S. HARESTAD, AND R. ARCHIBALD. 1987. Glyphosate treatment and deer mice in clearcut and forest. Northwest Science 61:199-202.
36. SABIN, T. E., AND S. G. STAFFORD. 1990. Assessing the need for transformation of response variables. Oregon State University Forest Research Laboratory Special Publication 20.
37. SANTILLO, D. J., D. M. LESLIE, JR., AND P. W. BROWN. 1989. Responses of small mammals and habitat to glyphosate application on clearcuts. Journal of Wildlife Management 53:164-172.
38. SAS INSTITUTE. 1990. SAS/STAT user's guide. Version 6. Fourth edition. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
39. STEEL, R. G. D., AND J. H. TORRIE. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. Second edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, USA.
40. SULLIVAN, D. S., AND T. P. SULLIVAN. 1980. Deer mouse trappability in relation to bait preference. Canadian Journal of Zoology 58:2282-2284.
41. SULLIVAN, T. P. 1979. Demography of populations of deer mice in coastal forest and clear-cut (logged) habitats. Canadian Journal of Zoology 57:1636-1648.
42. _. 1980. Comparative demography of Peromyscus maniculatus and Microtus oregoni populations after logging and burning of coastal forest habitats. Canadian Journal of Zoology 58:2252-2259.
43. _. 1990. Demographic responses of small mammal populations to a herbicide application in coastal coniferous forest: population density and resiliency. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68:874-883.
44. _, AND S. O. BOATENG. 1996. Comparison of small-mammal community responses to broadcast burning and herbicide application in cutover forest habitats. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26:462-473.
45. _, AND C. J. KREBS. 1981. Microtus population biology: demography of M. oregoni in southwestern British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Zoology 59:2092-2102.
46. _, AND D. S. SULLIVAN. 1981. Responses of a deer mouse population to a forest herbicide application: reproduction, growth, and survival. Canadian Journal of Zoology 59:1148-1154.
47. TEVIS, L., JR. 1956. Responses of small mammal populations to logging of Douglas-fir. Journal of Mammalogy 37:189-196.
48. TUCHMANN, E. F., K. P. CONNAUGHTON, L. E. FREEDMAN, AND C. B. MORIWAKI. 1996. The Northwest Forest Plan. A report to the President and Congress. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of Forestry and Economic Assistance, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, USA.
49. WHITAKER, J. O., JR., AND C. MASER. 1976. Food habits of five western Oregon shrews. Northwest Science 50:102-107.
50. WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. 1994. Glyphosate. Environmental Health Criteria 159. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.