Female voice communications in high level aircraft cockpit noises - Part II: Vocoder and automatic speech recognition systems

Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 69, Issue 11, 1998, Pages 1087-1094

  Nixon, Charles ^a,b   Anderson, Timothy ^a   Morris, Linda ^a   Mccavitt, Angela ^a   Mckinley, Richard ^a   Yeager, Donald ^a   McDaniel, Mark ^a  

^a AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b WP 441 Veridian ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AIRCRAFT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; VOICE;

ADULT; AEROSPACE MEDICINE; AVIATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEN; MILITARY PERSONNEL; NOISE, OCCUPATIONAL; RADIO; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; UNITED STATES; WOMEN;

EID: 0031756718     PISSN: 00956562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Air Force Occupational Safety, and Health. AFOSH Standard 48-19, Hazardous noise. 1993.
2. American national standard method for measuring the intelligibility of speech over communication systems. ANSI S3.2-1989 (ASA 85). New York: ASA Standards Secretariat.
3. Fletcher H. Speech and hearing in communication. New York: Van Nostrand Company, Inc. 1953.
4. House A, Williams S, Hecker CE, et al. Articulation testing methods: consonantal differentiation with a closed response set. J Acoust Soc Am 1965; 35:158-66.
5. Moore TJ, Nixon CW, McKinley RL. Comparative intelligibility of speech materials processed by standard Air Force communications systems in presence of simulated cockpit noise. Neuillysur-Seine, France: AGARD Conference Proceedings No. 311, Aural Communication in Aviation. 1981.
6. Nixon CW. Voice communications and positive pressure breathing. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: AFAMRL-TR-84-009. 1984.
7. Nixon CW, McKinley RL. Intelligibility in noise of three LPC voice channels with ANR headsets. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: AAMRL-TR-88-063. 1988.
8. Nixon CW, McKinley RL. LPC-10 intelligibility of oxygen masks and microphones in noise.Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: AAMRLTR-88-048. 1988.
9. Occupational Safety and Health Administratation (OSHA). Occupational noise exposure, hearing conservation amendment. Washington, DC: Federal Register 1983; 48(46):9738-85.
10. Simpson CA. Evaluation of speech recognizers for use in advanced combat helicopter crew station research and development. Moffet Field, CA: Ames Research Center. NASA Contractor Report 177547, U.S. Army Aviation Systems Command, TM-09-A-001. 1990.
11. Simpson CA, Marchionda-Frost K, Navarro T. Comparison of voice types for helicopter voice warning systems. Moffet Field, CA: Ames Research Center. NASA Contract NAS2-11341, Report 841611. 1987.
12. Williamson DT, Barry TP, Liggett KK. Flight test performance optimization of ITT VRS-1290 speech recognition system. NeuillySur-Seine, France: Audio Effectiveness in Aviation. AGARD-CP-596. 1997.
13. Werkowitz E. Speech recognition in the tactical environment: the AFTI-F-16 voice command. New York, NY: Proceedings of Speech Tech 1984, Media Dimensions. 1984.