Innovation and competitiveness: a review

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 363-395

  Clark, John ^a   Guy, Ken ^a  

^a Technopolis Group Austria   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVENESS; INDUSTRIAL POLICY; INNOVATION; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0031754920     PISSN: 09537325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537329808524322     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. M. Porter, Yhe Competitive Advantage of Nations (New York, Free Press, Macmillan, 1990);
2. OECD, Industrial Competitiveness (Paris, OECD, 1996);
3. D. J. Tecce (Ed.) The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal (Cambridge, MA, Ballinger, 1987).
4. M. Yoshitomi, 'New trends of Oligopolistic Competition in the Globalisation of High-Tech Industries: Interactions among Trade, Investment and Government', in: OECD, Strategic Industries in a Global Economy: Policy Issues for the 1990s (Paris, OECD, 1991);
5. T. M. G. L. Ncvcns, N. Summe & B. Uttal, 'Commercialising Technology: What the Best Companies Do', Harvard Business Review, May/June 1990.
6. N. Kaldor, 'The Role Of Increasing Returns, Technical Progress and Cumulative Causation in the Theory of International Trade and Economic Growth', Economic Appliquée (ISMEA), 34, 1981.
7. 1985, cited in OECD, Technology and the Economy-The Key Relationships (Paris, OECD, 1992).
8. P. Krugman, 'Competitiveness-A Dangerous Obsession", Foreign Affairs, March/April 1994, pp. 28-44.
9. OECD, op. Cit., Réf. 1.
10. Porter, op/ cit., Réf. 1.
11. M. E. Porter, 'Changing Patterns of International Competition' in: D. J. Teccc (Ed.), The Competitive Challenge (Cambridge, MA, Ballinger, 1987);
12. U. Muldur & R. Petrella with M. G. Colombo (Eds) The European Community and the Globalization of Technology and the Economy, EUR 15150 (Luxembourg, EC, 1994).
13. OECD, op. cit., Ref. 1.
14. OECD, op. Cit., Ref. 4;
15. G. Freeman (Ed.), The Economies of Innovation, International Library of Critical Writings In Economics, 2 (Aldershot, Edward Elgar, 1990);
16. C. Freeman, The Economics of Technical Change: A Critical Survey' Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18, 1994, pp. 463-514;
17. M. Dodgson & R. Rothwcll, The Handbook of Industrial Innovation (Aldershot, Edward Elgar, 1994);
18. G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg & L. Socle (Eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory (London, Frances Pintcr, and New York, Columbia University Press, 1988);
19. I. Kuusi (Ed.), Innovation Systems and Competitiveness (Helsinki, VATT, 1996);
20. P. Stoncman (Ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change (Oxford, Blackwcll Handbooks in Economics, 1995).
21. Adapted from M. Dodgson & T. Bessant, Effective Innovation Policy: A Xew Approach (London, International Thomson Business Press, 1996).
22. C. Freeman, 'Networks of Innovators: A Synthesis of Research Issues', Research Policy, 20, 1991), pp. 499-514.
23. G. Dosi, 'Sources, Procedures and Microcconomic Effects of Innovation', Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 1988, pp. 1126-1171.
24. OECD, op. cit., Ref. 1; Freeman, op. cit., Ref. 12;
25. E. von Hippcl, 'Cooperation Between Rivals: Informal Know-how Trading', Research Policy, 16, 1987, pp. 291-302.
26. C. Freeman, 'R & D Indicators: a Review', Paper prepared for OECD, Brighton, Science Policy Research Unit, 1982.
27. . Initially byj. Schmooklcr, Invention and Economic Growth (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966).
28. More recently by L. Socle, 'The Impact of Technological Innovation on International Trade Patterns: The Evidence Reconsidered', Research Policy, 16, 1987, pp. 101-130;
29. P. Patel & K. Pavitl, 'Patterns of Technology Activity', in: P. Stoneman (Ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change (Oxford, Blackwcll Handbooks in Economics, 1995).
30. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change Ibid.
31. C. Freeman (Ed.), Outpul Measurement in Science and Technology (Amsterdam, North Holland, 1987).
32. C. Freeman, J. Clark & L. Socte, Unemployment and Technical Innovation (London, Frances Pintcr, 1982).
33. D. Archibugi, P. Cohcndct, A. Kristcnscn & K.-A. SchalTcr, Evaluation of the Community Innovation Survey (CIS)-Phase I European Innovation Monitoring System (EIMS Publication 11, 1996).
34. From J. Calvcrt, C. Ibarra, P. Patcl, K. Pavitt & N. Von Tunzclmann, Innovation Outputs in European Industry: Analysis from CIS (Brighton, Science Policy Research Unit, 1996).
35. R. M. Solow, 'Technical Progress and the Aggregate Production Function', Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 1957, pp. 312-320.
36. Z. Grilichcs, 'R&D and Productivity: Econometric Results and Measurement Issues', in: P. Stoncman (Ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change (Oxford, Blackwcll Handbooks in Economics, 1995).
37. H. Capron & B. van I'ottclsbcrghe, 'Public Support to Business R&D: An Integrated Assessment Scheme and Some Additional Quantitative Evidence', Paper prepared for the OECD conference on Policy Evaluation Practices in Innovation and Technology, Paris, 1997.
38. Calvcrt et al, op. cit., Réf. 21.
39. L. Socte, 'A General Test of Technological Gap Trade Theory', Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 117, 1981, pp. 638-666.
40. J. Fagerberg, 'A Technology Gap Approach to Why Growth Rates Differ', Research Policy, 16, 1987, pp. 87-101.
41. Dosi, op. cit., Réf. 13.
42. K. Clark, 'Investment in New Technology and Competitive Advantage', in: D. J. Tccce (Ed.), The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal (Cambridge, MA, Ballinger, 1987).
43. J. Cobbenhagen, F. den Hartog & H. Pennings, Iledrijfsvemieuwing leaders in Innovation (The Hague, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Bcleidsstudies 29, 1995).
44. P. Hcydebrcck, 'Technological Interweavement: A Means for New Technology-based Firms to Achieve Innovation Success', in: D. Joncs-Evans & M. Klofstcn (Eds), Technology, Innovation and Enterprise-The European Experience (London, Macmillan, 1997).
45. J. A Schumpter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (New York, Harper, 1942).
46. W. Salter, Productivity and Technical Change (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1962);
47. P. Isard, 'Employment Impacts of Textile Imports and Investment: A Vintage Capital Model', American Economic Review, 63, 1973, pp. 402-416.
48. G. Silverberg & 15. Vcrspagcn, 'Evolutionary Theorising on Economic Growth', in: I. Kuusi (Ed.), Innovation Systems and Competitiveness (Helsinki, VATT, 1996).
49. R. R. Nelson & S. G. Winter, 'In Search of Useful Theory of Innovation', Research Polity, 6, 1977, pp. 36-76.
50. Silverberg & Vcrspagen, op. cit., Réf. 34.
51. European Commission, Growth, Competitiveness, Employment: The Challenges and Ways Forward into the 21st Century (Brussels, EC White Paper, 1994).
52. L. E. Andrcascn, B. Coriat, F. den Hertog & R. Kaplinsky (Eds.), Europe's Next Step: Organisational Innovation, Competition and Employment (London, Frank Cass, 1995).
53. Europe's next Step: Organisational Innovation, Competition and Employment Ibid.
54. N. Roscnbcrg, 'Perspectives: A View from the USA', in: L. E. Andreascn, et al. (Eds.), Europe's Next Step: Organizational Innovation, Competition and Employment (London, Frank Cass, 1995).
55. T. Kcalcy, Tlie Economic Laws of Scientific Research (London and New York: Macmillan and St Martin's Press, 1996).
56. K. Arrow, 'The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing', Review of Economic Studies, 29, 1962, pp. 155-173.
57. R. G. Lipsey & K. I. Carlaw, 'Policies to Encourage the Advancement ofTcchnological Knowledge', Paper presented to the Six Country Programme Conference, Gent, Belgium, 1996.
58. Six Country Programme Conference Ibid.
59. J. S. Mctcalfc, The Economic Foundations of Technolog)' Policy: Equilibrium and Evolutionary Perspectives, in: P. Stoneman (Ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change (Oxford, BlackwcII Handbooks in Economics, 1995).
60. C. Freeman, 'Japan: A New National System of Innovation', in: G. Dosi et al. (Eds), Technical Change and Economic Tlieory (Ixjndon, Frances Pintcr, and New York, Columbia University Press, 1988).
61. OECD, National Innovation Systems (Paris, OECD, 1997).
62. Dodgson & Bcssant, op. cit., Ref. 11.
63. For example, K. Pavitt & P. Patel, 'The International Distribution and Determinants of Tcchnological Activities', Oxford Review of Economic I'oliy, 4, 1988, pp. 35-55.
64. R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1993).
65. K. Guy & E. Arnold, Performance and Competitive Success: Government IT Policies in Competing Countries (London, NEDO, 1988);
66. K. Guy & E. Arnold, 'Information Technology Diffusion Policies' (Background paper for an ad hoc meeting of the OECD/ICCP Expert Group on the Economic Implications of Information Technologies, Paris, 7-8 November 1991;
67. E. Arnold & K. Guy, 'Policy Options for Promoting Growth through Information Technology, in: Information Technology and New Growth Opportunities, OECD/ICCP 19 (Paris, OECD, 1989);
68. N. Hanna, K. Guy & E. Arnold, The Diffusion of Information Technology: Experience of Industrial Countries and Lessons for Developing Countries, World Bank Discussion Papers 281 (Washington, DC, World Bank, 1995).
69. D. Mowcry, 'The Practice of Technology Policy', in: P. Stoneman (Ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change (Oxford, BlackwcII Handbooks in Economics, 1995).
70. Hanna et al., op. cit., Ref. 51.
71. OECD, Diffusing Technology to Industry: Government Policies and Programmes (Paris, OECD Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy, 1997).
72. A. Arundcl, G. van der Paal & L. Socle, PACE Report: Innovation Strategies of Europe's Largest Firms (Maastricht, MERIT, IJmburg University, 1995).
73. B. Martin & A. Sailer wilh D. Hicks, K. Pavitt, J. Senker, M. Sharp & N. von Tunzelmann, The Relationship between I'ublicly funded Basic Research and Economic Performance-A SPRU Review (Brighton, Science Policy Research Unit, 1996).
74. The Relationship between I'ublicly Funded Basic Research and Economic Performance-A SPRU Review Ibid.
75. Z. Griliches, 'Productivity, R&D, and Basic Research at the Firm Level in the 1970s', American Economic Review, 76, 1986, pp. 141-154; Griliches, op. cit., Réf. 23.
76. Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D, Patents and I'roductivity (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1984);
77. A. N. Link, 'An analysis of the composition of R&D spending', Southern Economic Journal, 49, 1982, pp. 342-349.
78. Capron & van Pottclsbcrghe, op/ cit., Rcf. 24.
79. P. Quintas & K. Guy, Collaborative, Pre-compctitive R&D and the Firm, Research Policy, 24, 1995, pp. 325-348.
80. D. Mowery & N. Roscnberg, Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth (New York, Cambridge University Press, 1989).
81. D. C. Mowery, 'Collaborative Ventures Between U.S. and Foreign Manufacturing Firms', Research Policy, 18, 1989, pp. 19-32.
82. National Academy of Engineering, Foreign Participation in US Research and Development, Asset or Liability? (Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1996).
83. K. Guy el al., The Synthesis Report of the Evaluation of the Inter-Regional Information Society Initiative (IRISI), Report to DGXIII, DGXVI and DGV of the European Commission (Brighton, Tcchnopolis, 1998).
84. M. Sharp, 'The Single Market and European Policies for Advanced Technologies', in: C. Freeman, M. Sharp & W. Walker (Eds), Technolog)' and the Future of Europe (London, Pinter, 1991);
85. M. Borrus, Competing for Control (Cambridge, MA, Ballinger, 1988); Mowery, op. cit., Rcf. 52.
86. K. Guy, L. Gcorghiou, P. Quintas, H. Cameron, M. Hobday, & T. Ray, Evaluation of the Alvey Programme Jar Advanced Information Technology (Ixindon, HMSO, 1991);
87. J. Stroyan & K. Guy with J. Barrctt, P. Wcissglas, D. Williams & M. Kaitcra, The Electronics Design and Manufacturing Technology Programme 1991-1995: Evaluation Report (Helsinki, TEKES, 1996).
88. Mower)', The Electronics Design and Manufacturing Technology Programme 1991-1995: Evaluation Report op. cit., Rcf. 52.
89. The Electronics Design and Manufacturing Technology Programme 1991-1995: Evaluation Report Ibid.
90. E. Mansfield, 'Patents and Imitation: An Empirical Study', Management Science, 32, 1986, pp. 173-181.
91. J.J. Cordes, 'Tax Incentives and R&D Spending: A Review of the Evidence', Research Policy, 18, 1988, pp. 119-133;
92. J.J. Cordes, The Effect of Tax Policy on the Creation of New Technical Knowledge: An Assessment of the Evidence', in: R. M. Cycrt & D. C. Mowery (Eds), The Impact of Technological Change on Employment and Economic Growth (Cambridge, MA, Ballinger, 1989).
93. OECD, Fiscal Measures to Promote R&D and Innovation (Paris, OECD, 1996).
94. IJpscy & Carlaw, op. cit., Ref. 43.
95. OECD, op. cit., Ref. 54.
96. I. Feller, 'Universities as Engines of R&D-bascd Economic Growth: They Think They Can', Research Policy, 19, 1990, pp. 335-348.
97. Research Policy Ibid.
98. K. Guy, 'The Evaluation of Innopoli and the Otanicmi Science Park Cluster', in: K. Guy, (Ed.), The Science Park Evaluation Handbook, Report Preparedfor Directorate General XIII of the European Commission (Brighton, Tcchnopolis, 1996).
99. OECD, op. cit., Rcf. 72.
100. Mowery, op. cit., Rcf. 52.
101. E. Arnold, P. Boekholt, M. Mcyer, P. Sowdcn & B. Thuriaux, Policies to Support Technological Capabilities, Report to the Research Council of Norway (Brighton, Tcchnopolis, 1997).
102. K. Guy & A. Cawson, Multimedia Demonstrator Programme, A Report prepared for the Multimedia Unit, Department of Trade and Industry (Brighton, Technopolis, 1995).
103. W. S. Baer, L. L. Johnson & E. W. Merrow, 'Government Sponsored Demonstrations of New Technologies', Science, 196, 1977, pp. 950-957.
104. Arnold et al, op. cit., Rcf. 80.
105. Guy et al, op. cit., Ref. 65.
106. Mowery, op. cit., Rcf. 52.
107. K. Guy & E. Arnold, SPRINT-The Evaluation of the Specific Projects Action Une, Report EUR 15931 EN (Luxembourg, Office for Officiai Publication of the European Community, 1995);
108. K. Guy, (Ed.), The Role of Technology Transfer Projects in the Innovation Process, Proceedings of an international conference sponsored by DGXIII, EUR 17010 (Luxembourg, Office for Official Publication of the European Community, 1996).
109. OECD, Small am! Medium-sized Enterprises: Technology and Competitiveness (Paris, OECD, 1993).
110. Arnold el ai, op. cit., Ref. 80.
111. OECD, op. cit., Ref. 87.
112. Freeman, 1994, op. cit., Ref. 10.
113. E. Arnold & K. Guy, 'Technology Diffusion Programmes and thé Challenge for Evaluation', Paper prepared for thé OECD conference on Policy Evaluation Practices in Innovation and Technology, OECD, Paris, 1997.