The effects of drug discrimination history on drug discrimination and on punished and unpunished responding

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 93-105

  Li, M I ^a   Mcmillan, D E ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioral history; Buspirone; Cocaine; Diazepam; Drug discrimination; Methamphetamine; Morphine; Phencyclidine; Pigeons; Punishment

Indexed keywords

BUSPIRONE; COCAINE; DIAZEPAM; METHAMPHETAMINE; MORPHINE; PENTOBARBITAL; PHENCYCLIDINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DISCRIMINATION; INTRAMUSCULAR DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MALE; NONHUMAN; PIGEON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUNISHMENT;

ANIMALS; BUSPIRONE; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; COLUMBIDAE; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRUG INTERACTIONS; GENERALIZATION, RESPONSE; HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES; MALE; METHAMPHETAMINE; MORPHINE; NARCOTICS; PENTOBARBITAL; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SEROTONIN AGONISTS;

AVES; COLUMBA;

EID: 0031753361     PISSN: 00913057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0091-3057(98)00077-X     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Azrin, N. H.: A technique for delivering shock to pigeons. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2:161-163;1959.
2. Geller, I.: Relative potencies of benzodiazepines as measured by their effects on conflict behavior. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. Ther. 149:243-247;1964.
3. Geller, I.; Seifter, J.: The effects of mono-urethans, di-urethans, and barbiturates on a punishment discrimination. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 136:284-288;1962.
4. Hendry, J. S.; Balster, R. L.; Rosecrans, J. A.: Discriminative stimulus properties of buspirone compared to central nervous system depressants in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 19:97-101; 1983.
5. Kelleher, R. T.; Morse, W. H.: Escape behavior and punished behavior. Fed. Proc. 23:808-817;1964.
6. Leaf, R. C.; Muller, A.: Effects of shock intensity, deprivation and morphine in a simple approach-avoidance conflict situation. Psychol. Rep. 17:819-823;1965.
7. McMillan, D. E.: Drugs and punished responding I: Rate dependent effects under multiple schedules. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 19:133-145; 1973.
8. McMillan, D. E.: Determinants of drug effects on punished responding. Fed. Proc. 34:1870-1875; 1975.
9. McMillan, D. E.; Cole-Fullenwider, D. A.; Hardwick, W. C.; Wenger, G. R.: Phencyclidine discrimination in the pigeon using color tracking under second-order schedules. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 37:143-147;1982.
10. McMillan, D. E.; Li, M.; Hardwick, W. C.: Discriminative stimulus effects and antipunishment effects of drugs measured during the same session. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 56:161-166;1997.
11. McMillan, D. E.; Sun, W.-L.; Hardwick, W. C.: Effects of drug discrimination history on the generalization of pentobarbital to other drugs. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 278:50-61;1996.
12. Witkin, J. W.; Carter, R. B.; Dykstra, L. A.: Discriminative stimulus properties of d-amphetamine-pentobarbital combinations. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 68:269-276; 1980.
13. Witkin, J. W.; Perez, L. A.: Comparison of effects of buspirone and gepirone with benzodiazepines and antagonists of dopamine and serotonin receptors on punished behavior of rats. Behav. Pharmacol. 1:247-254; 1990.