Transitive responding in animals and humans: Exaptation rather than adaptation?

Behavioural Processes

Volumn 42, Issue 2-3, 1998, Pages 107-137

  Delius, Juan D ^a   Siemann, Martina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Darwinian fitness; Deductive reasoning; Humans; Learning models; Neural networks; Pigeons; Primates; Rats; Transitive inference; Transitive responding; Utility landscapes

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; COGNITION; LOGIC; MODEL; NONHUMAN;

EID: 0031749359     PISSN: 03766357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-6357(97)00072-7     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. Archer, J., 1992. Ethology and Human Development. Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York.
2. Belke T.W. Stimulus preference and the transitivity of preference. Anim. Learn. Behav. 20:1992;401-406.
3. Berry D.C. The role of action in implicit learning. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 43A:1991;881-906.
4. Biederman G.B., Poulos C.X., Heighinton G.A. Paradoxical preference for more frequently occurring negative stimuli and for less frequently occurring positive stimuli as a function of amount of training in simultaneous discrimination learning. Learn. Motiv. 7:1976;603-613.
5. Biegler R., Morris R.G. Landmark stability is a prerequisite for spatial but not discrimination learning. Nature. 361:1993;631-633.
6. Bingman, V.P., 1990. Spatial navigation in birds. In: Kesner, R.P., Olton, D.S. (Eds.), Neurobiology of Comparative Cognition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp. 423-447.
7. Boysen S.T., Berntson G.G., Shreyer T.A., Quigley K.S. Processing of ordinality and transitivity by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J. Comp. Psychol. 107:1993;208-215.
8. Breslow L. Reevaluation of the literature on development of transitive inferences. Psychol. Bull. 89:1981;325-351.
9. Brown P.L., Jenkins H.M. Autoshaping of the pigeon's key peck. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 11:1968;1-8.
10. Bryant P.E., Trabasso T. Transitive inferences and memory in young children. Nature. 232:1971;456-458.
11. Burt C. The development of reasoning in schoolchildren. J. Exp. Pedagogy. 5:1919;68-77.
12. Bush R.R., Mosteller F. A mathematical model for simple learning. Psychol. Rev. 38:1951;313-323.
13. Carmesin H.O., Schwegler H. Parallel versus sequential processing of relational stimulus structures. Biol. Cybernet. 71:1994;523-529.
14. Chalmers M., McGonigle B. Are children any more logical than monkeys on the five-term series problem? J. Exp. Child Psychol. 37:1984;355-377.
15. Chase I.D. The sequential analysis of aggressive acts during hierarchy formation: An application of the 'jigsaw puzzle' approach. Anim. Behav. 33:1985;86-100.
16. Churchland, P.S., Sejnowski, T.J., 1993. The Computational Brain. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Coombs, C.H., Dawes, R.M., Tversky, A., 1970. Mathematical Psychology, an Elementary Introduction. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
18. Couvillon P.A., Bitterman M.E. Performance of honeybees in reversal and ambiguous-cue problems: Tests of a choice model. Anim. Learn. Behav. 14:1986;225-231.
19. Couvillon P.A., Bitterman M.E. A conventional conditioning analysis of 'transitive inference'. J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Processes. 18:1992;308-310.
20. Dall S.R.X., Cuthill I.C. Searching in patches by European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris. Behav. Processes. 39:1997;149-159.
21. Davies D.G.S., Staddon J.E.R., Machado A., Palmer R.G. The process of recurrent choice. Psychol. Rev. 100:1993;310-320.
22. Davis, H., 1992a. Logical transitivity in animals. In: Honig, W.K., Fetterman, J.G. (Eds.), Cognitive Aspects of Stimulus Control. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp. 405-429.
23. Davis H. Transitive inference in rats. J. Comp. Psychol. 106:1992;342-349.
24. Davis H. Underestimating the rat's intelligence. Cogn. Brain Res. 3:1996;291-298.
25. Davison, M., McCarthy, D., 1988. The Matching Law. Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
26. Dawkins R. A threshold model of choice behaviour. Anim. Behav. 17:1969;120-133.
27. Delius, J.D., 1994. Comparative cognition of identity. In: Bertelson, P., Eelen, P., d'Ydewalle, D. (Eds.), International Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1. Erlbaum, Hove, pp. 25-40.
28. Delius J.D., Pellander K. Hunger dependence of electrical brain self-stimulation in the pigeon. Physiol. Behav. 28:1982;63-66.
29. De Soto C.B., London M., Handel S. Social reasoning and spatial paralogic. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2:1965;513-521.
30. De Villiers, P., 1977. Choice in concurrent schedules and a quantitative formulation of the law of effect. In: Honig, W.K., Staddon, J.E.R. (Eds.). Handbook of Operant Behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 233-287.
31. de Vries H. An improved test of linearity in dominance hierarchies containing unknown or tied relatioships. Anim. Behav. 50:1995;1375-1389.
32. De Waal, F.B.M., 1982. Chimpanzee Politics. Jonathan Cape, London.
33. Emmerton, J., Delius, J.D., 1993. Beyond sensation: Visual cognition in pigeons. In: Zeigler, H.P., Bischof, H.-J. (Eds.). Vision, Brain and Behavior in Birds. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 377-390.
34. Evans, J.S.B.T., Newstead, S.E., Byrne, R.M.J., 1993. Human Reasoning: The Psychology of Deduction. Erlbaum, Hove.
35. Gebhardt, R.P., Siemann, M., 1997. Processing of linear and nonlinear relationships in human adults (submitted).
36. Gillan D.J. Reasoning in the chimpanzee: II. Transitive inference. J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Processes. 7:1981;150-164.
37. Gould S.J., Vrba E.S. Exaptation, a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology. 8:1982;4-15.
38. Greenberg G. Anagenetic theory in comparative psychology. Int. J. Comp. Psychol. 8:1995;31-41.
39. Hall G. An investigation of ambiguous-cue learning in pigeons. Anim. Learn. Behav. 8:1980;283-286.
40. Harris M., McGonigle B. A model of transitive inference. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 47B:1994;310-348.
41. Henley N., Horsfall R., De Soto C. Goodness of figure and social structure. Psychol. Rev. 76:1969;194-204.
42. Herrnstein R.J. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 4:1961;267-272.
43. Higa J.J., Staddon J.E.R. 'Transitive inference' in multiple conditional discriminations. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 59:1993;265-291.
44. Hogue M.E., Beaugrand J.P., Lague P.C. Coherent use of information by hens observing their former dominant defeating or being defeated by a stranger. Behav. Processes. 38:1996;241-252.
45. Huttenlocher J. Constructing spatial images: A strategy in reasoning. Psychol. Rev. 75:1968;550-560.
46. Johnson-Laird, P.N., 1983. Mental Models. University Press, Cambridge.
47. Kandel, E.R., Schwartz, J.H., Jessell, T.M. (Eds.), 1991. Principles of Neural Science, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, London.
48. Keller, C., Siemann, M., 1996. Implicit and explicit transitive inferences in human adults in a non-verbal task. In: Elsner, N., Schnitzler, H.U. (Eds.), Göttingen Neurobiology Report 1996, Thieme, Stuttgart, pp. 780.
49. Kosslyn S.M., Thompson W.L., Kim I.J., Alpert N.M. Topographical representations of mental images in primary visual cortex. Nature. 378:1994;496-498.
50. Krebs, J.R., Davies, N.B., 1984. Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford.
51. Luce, R.D., 1959. Individual Choice Behavior. Wiley, New York.
52. Mackintosh, N.J., 1974. The Psychology of Animal Learning. Academic Press, London.
53. Mandler, G., 1989. Memory: conscious and unconscious. In: Solomon, P.C., Goethals, G.R., Kelley, C.M., Stephens, B.R. (Eds.), Memory: Interdisciplinary Approaches. Springer, New York, pp. 84-106.
54. McFarland, D., Bösser, T., 1993. Intelligent Behaviour in Animals and Robots. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
55. McGonigle B., Chalmers M. Are monkeys logical? Nature. 267:1977;694-696.
56. McGonigle, B., Chalmers, M., 1986. Representation and strategies during inference. In: Myers, T., Brown, K., McGonigle, B. (Eds.), Reasoning and Discourse Processes. Academic Press, New York, pp. 141-164.
57. McGonigle B., Chalmers M. Monkeys are rational! Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 45B:1992;189-228.
58. Olton, D.S., 1990. Spatial perception: Behavioral and neural analyses. In: Stebbins, W.C., Berkley, M.A. (Eds.), Comparative Perception: Complex Signals. Wiley, New York, pp. 217-244.
59. Palm G. On the information storage capacity of local learning rules. Neural Comput. 4:1992;703-711.
60. Pearce, J.M., 1997. Animal Learning and Cognition, An Introduction, 2nd edn. Psychology Press, Hove.
61. Pepperberg I.M. Numerical competence in an African Gray Parrot (Psittacus erithacus). J. Comp. Psychol. 108:1994;36-44.
62. Piaget J. Une forme verbal de la comparison chez l'enfant (A verbal form of comparisons in the child). Arch. Psychol. 1921:1921;141-172.
63. Piaget, J., 1953. Logic and Psychology, 1st edn. University Press, Manchester.
64. Reber, A.S., 1993. Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
65. Rensch, B., 1973. Gedächtnis, Begriffsbildung und Planhandlung bei Tieren (Memory, Concept Formation, and Planned Behaviour in Animals). Parey, Berlin.
66. Rensch B., Dücker G. Discrimination of patterns indicating four and five degrees of reward by birds. Behav. Biol. 9:1973;279-288.
67. Rescorla, R.A., Wagner, A.R., 1972. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In: Black, A.H., Prokasy, W.F. (Eds.), Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp. 64-99.
68. Roberts W.A., Phelps M.T. Transitive inference in rats: A test of the spatial coding hypothesis. Psychol. Sci. 5:1994;368-374.
69. Rolls, E.T., 1975. The Brain and Reward. Pergamon, Oxford.
70. Rudy J.W. Development of learning: From elemental to configural associative networks. Adv. Infancy Res. 7:1992;247-289.
71. Sapolsky, R.M., 1992. Stress, the Aging Brain, and the Mechanisms of Neuron Death. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
72. Savage-Rumbaugh, E.S., Lewin, R., 1994. Kanzi: The Ape at the Brink of the Human Mind. Wiley, New York.
73. Seyfarth, R.M., Cheney, D.L., 1988. Do monkeys understand their relations? In: Byrne, R.W., Whiten, A. (Eds.), Machiavellian Intelligence. Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes and Humans. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 69-84.
74. Shanks D.R., St. John M.F. Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behav. Brain Sci. 17:1994;367-447.
75. Siegel, L.S., 1978. The relationship of language and thought in the preoperational child: A reconsideration of nonverbal alternatives to Piagetian tasks. In: Siegel, L.S., Brainerd, C.J. (Eds.), Alternatives to Piaget: Critical Essays on the Theory. Academic Press, New York, pp. 43-68.
76. Siemann, M., 1993. Transitive Inferenz: Experimentelle Untersuchung einer kognitiven Leistung (Transitive Inference: Experimental Investigation of a Cognitive Performance). PhD Thesis, Universität Konstanz.
77. Siemann M. Überprüfung einfacher Modelle zum transitiven Schluβfolgern bei nonverbaler Aufgabenstellung (Test of simple models of transitive deduction with nonverbal tasks). Z. Exp. Angew. Psychol. 41:1994;584-616.
78. Siemann M. Transitive Inferenz bei nonverbaler Präsentationsform, ein Überblick (Transitive inference using a nonverbal form of presentation, a review). Z. Psychol. 204:1996;233-259.
79. Siemann, M., Daniel, D., Dombrowski, D., Delius, J.D., 1993. Value transfer in pigeon conditioning. In: Elsner, N., Heisenberg, M. (Eds.), Gene, Brain and Behavior. Thieme, Stuttgart, p. 856.
80. Siemann M., Delius J.D. Implicit deductive responding in humans. Naturwissenschaften. 80:1993;364-366.
81. Siemann M., Delius J.D. Processing of hierarchic stimulus structures has advantages in humans and animals. Biol. Cybernet. 71:1994;531-536.
82. Siemann M., Delius J.D. Influences of task concreteness upon transitive responding in humans. Psychol. Res. 59:1996;81-93.
83. Siemann, M., Delius, J.D., 1997. Learning and neural network models for transitive and nontransitive responding in humans and animals. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. (in press).
84. Siemann M., Delius J.D., Dombrowski D., Daniel S. Value transfer in pigeon discrimination learning. Psychol. Rec. 46:1996;707-728.
85. Siemann M., Delius J.D., Wright A.A. Transitive responding in pigeons: Influences of stimulus frequency and reinforcement history. Behav. Processes. 37:1996;185-195.
86. Siemann M., Gebhardt R.P. Einfluβ der Instruktion und Aufgabenkomplexität auf transitive Entscheidungen (Influence of instructions and task complexity on transitive decisions). Z. Exp. Psychol. 43:1996;435-460.
87. Siemann, M., Krug, I., 1996. Further evidence for a value transfer in pigeons. In: Elsner, N., Schnitzler, H.U. (Eds.), Proc. Göttingen Neurobiology Meeting, Thieme, Stuttgart, p. 782.
88. Smedslund J. Development of concrete transitivity of length in children. Child Dev. 34:1963;389-405.
89. Spetch M.L. Further studies of pigeons' spatial working memory in the open-field task. Anim. Learn. Behav. 18:1990;332-340.
90. Staddon, J.E.R., 1983. Adaptive Behavior and Learning. University Press, Cambridge.
91. Steirn J.N., Weaver J.E., Zentall T.R. Transitive inference in pigeons: Simplified procedures and a test of value transfer theory. Anim. Learn. Behav. 23:1995;76-82.
92. Tinbergen, N., 1951. The Study of Instinct. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
93. Trabasso, T., Riley, C.A., 1975. The construction and use of representations involving linear order. In: Solso, R.L., (Ed.). Information Processing and Cognition. The Loyola Symposium, Erlbaum, New York, pp. 381-410.
94. Treichler F.R., Van Tilburg D. Concurrent conditional discrimination tests of transitive inference by macaque monkeys: List linking. J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Processes. 22:1996;105-117.
95. Trivers, R., 1985. Social Evolution. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park.
96. von Fersen, L., 1989. Kognitive Prozesse bei Tauben (Columba livia) (Cognitive Processes in Pigeons (Columba livia)). Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus.
97. von Fersen, L., Delius, J.D., 1992. Schluβfolgerndes Denken bei Tauben (Deductive Thinking in Pigeons). Spektrum Wiss. 7, 18-22.
98. von Fersen L., Wynne C.D.L., Delius J.D., Staddon J.E.R. Transitive inference formation in pigeons. J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Processes. 17:1991;334-341.
99. Weaver J.E., Steirn J.N., Zentall T.R. Transitive inference in pigeons: Control for differential value transfer. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 4:1997;113-117.
100. Werner U., Köppl U., Delius J.D. Transitive Inferenz bei nichtverbaler Aufgabendarbietung (Transitive inference with nonverbal task presentation). Z. Exp. Angew. Psychol. 39:1992;662-693.
101. Whiten, A., Byrne, R.W., 1988. The Machiavellian intelligence hypotheses: editorial. In: Byrne, R.W., Whiten, A. (Eds.), Machiavellian Intelligence. Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes and Humans. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 1-10.
102. Wilkie D.M., Carr J.A.R., Galloway J., Parker K.J., Yamamoto A. Some characteristics of spatial associative memory in the pigeon (Columba livia). Behav. Processes. 38:1996;67-76.
103. Wilkie D.M., Willson R.J. More evidence of robust spatial associative memory in the pigeon (Columba livia). Anim. Learn. Behav. 23:1995;69-75.
104. Woocher F.D., Glass A.L., Holyoak K.J. Positional discriminability in linear orderings. Mem. Cognit. 6:1978;165-173.
105. Wynne C.D.L. Reinforcement accounts for transitive inference performance. Anim. Learn. Behav. 23:1995;207-217.
106. Wynne C.D.L. Transverse patterning in pigeons. Behav. Processes. 38:1996;119-130.
107. Wynne C.D.L. Pigeon transitive inference: Tests of simple accounts of a complex performance. Behav. Processes. 39:1997;95-112.
108. Wynne C.D.L., von Fersen L., Staddon J.E.R. Pigeons' inferences are transitive and the outcome of elementary conditioning principles: A response. J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Processes. 18:1992;313-315.
109. Zayan R. Mental representations in the recognition of conspecific individuals. Behav. Processes. 33:1994;233-246.
110. Zentall T.R., Sherburne L.M. Transfer of value from S+ to S- in a simultaneous discrimination. J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Processes. 20:1994;176-183.
111. Zentall T.R., Sherburne L.M., Roper K.L., Kraemer P.J. Value transfer in a simultaneous discrimination appears to result from within-event Pavlovian conditioning. J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Processes. 22:1996;68-75.
112. Zentall T.R., Weaver J.E., Sherburne L.M. Value transfer in concurrent-schedule discriminations by pigeons. Anim. Learn. Behav. 24:1996;401-409.