Interspecific mate choice by late-courting male western grebes

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 313-321

  Nuechterlein, Gary L ^a   Buitron, Deborah ^a  

^a NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aechromophorus; Grebes; Hybridization; Mate choice; Operational sex ratio

Indexed keywords

INTERSPECIFIC HYBRIDIZATION; ISOLATION PROCEDURE; MATING SYSTEM;

HYBRIDIZATION; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; LATE-COURTING; MATE CHOICE; SEX RATIO;

AECHMOPHORUS CLARKII; AECHMOPHORUS OCCIDENTALIS; AECHROMOPHORUS;

EID: 0031746268     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/9.3.313     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ahlquist JE, Bledsoe AH, Ratti JT, Sibley CG, 1987. Divergence of the single-copy DNA sequences of the western grebe (A. occidentalis) and Clark's grebe (A. clarkii), as indicated by DNA-DNA hybridization. Postula No. 200.
2. American Ornithologists' Union, 1985. Thirty-fifth supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union check-list of North American birds. Auk 102:680-686.
3. Bateson P, 1983. Optimal outbreeding. In: Mate choice (Bateson P, ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 257-278.
4. Berglund A, 1994. The operational sex ratio influences choosiness in a pipefish. Behav Ecol 5:254-258.
5. Berglund A, 1995. Many mates make male pipefish choosy. Behaviour 132:213-218.
6. Clutton-Brock TH, Parker GA, 1992. Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Q Rev Biol 67:437-456.
7. Cohen J, 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Colwell MA, Oring LW, 1988. Sex ratios and intrasexual competition for mates in a sex-role reversed shorebird, Wilson's phalarope (Phalaropus tricolor). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:165-173.
9. Coulson JC, 1966. The influence of the pair-bond and age on the breeding biology of the kittiwake gull Rissa tridactyla. J Animal Ecol 35:269-279.
10. Crowley PH, Travers SE, Linton MC, Cohn SL, Sih A, Sargeant CR, 1991. Mate density, predation risk, and the seasonal sequence of mate choices: a dynamic game. Am Nat 137:567-596.
11. Eichhorst BA, 1994. Mitochondrial DNA variation within the Western-Clark's Grebe complex (Podicipedidae, Aechmophorus) (PhD Dissertation). Grand Forks, ND University of North Dakota.
12. Eichhorst BA, Parkin BD, 1991. Clark's grebes and suspected western×Clark's grebe hybrids in Manitoba. Blue Jay 49:196-200.
13. Emlen ST, Oring LW, 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197:215-223.
14. Enders MM, 1993. The effect of male size and operational sex ratio on male mating success in the common spider mite, Tetranychus urtcae Koch (Acari: Teranychidae). Am Nat 46:835-846.
15. Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A, 1996. GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behav Res Meth Instr Compu 28:1-11.
16. Gibson RM, Langen TM, 1996. How do animals choose their mates? Trends Ecol Evol 11:468-470.
17. Gwynne DT, Simmons LW, 1990. Experimental reversal of courtship roles in an insect. Nature 346:172-174.
18. Johnstone RA, Reynolds JD, Deutsch JC, 1996. Mutual mate choice and sex differences in choosiness. Evolution 50:1382-1391.
19. Kruse KC, 1990. Male back space availability in the giant waterbug (Belostoma flumineum Say). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:281-290.
20. Kvarnemo C, Ahnesjö I, 1996. The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. Trends Ecol Evol 11:404-408.
21. Luttbeg B, 1996. A comparative Bates tactic for mate assessment and choice. Behav Ecol 7:451-460.
22. Mayr E, 1974. Populations, Species and Evolution, 3rd printing. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
23. Mills JA, 1973. The influence of age and pair-bond on the breeding biology of the red-billed gull (Larus novaehollandiae scopulinus). J Anim Ecol 42:147-162.
24. Noe R, Hammerstein P, 1994. Biological markets: supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:1-11.
25. Nuechterlein GL, 1981a. Courtship behavior and reproductive isolation of dark- and light-phase western grebes. Auk 98:335-349.
26. Nuechterlein GL, 1981b. Variations and multiple functions of the advertising display of western grebes. Behaviour 76:289-317.
27. Nuechterlein GL, 1982. Western grebes, the birds that walk on water. Natl Geogr 161:624-637.
28. Nuechterlein GL, Storer RW, 1982. Pair-formation displays of the western grebe. Condor 84:350-369.
29. Parker GA, 1983. Mate quality and mating decisions. In: Mate Choice (Bateson P, ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 141-164.
30. Ratti JT, 1979. Reproductive separation and isolating mechanisms between sympatric dark- and light-phase western grebes. Auk 96:573-586.
31. Real L, 1990. Search theory and mate choice. I. Models of single-sex discrimination. Am Nat 136:376-405.
32. Real L, 1991. Search theory and mate choice. II. Mutual interaction, assortative mating and equilibrium variation in male and female fitness. Am Nat 138:901-917.
33. Rowley I, 1983. Re-mating in birds. In: Mate choice (Bateson P, ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 331-360.
34. Ryan MJ, Rand AS, 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47:647-657.
35. Shelly TE, Bailey WJ, 1992. Experimental manipulation of mate choice by male katydids: the effect of female encounter rate. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:277-282.
36. Storer RW, Nuechterlein GL, 1985. An analysis of plumage and morphological characters of the two color forms of the western grebe (Aechmophorus). Auk 102:102-119.
37. Storer RW, Nuechterlein GL, 1992. Western and Clark's grebe. In: The birds of North America, No. 26 (Poole A, Stettenhem P, Gill F, eds). Philadelphia: The American Ornithologists' Union.
38. Vincent A, Ahnesjö I, Berlund A, 1994. Operational sex ratios and behavioral sex differences in a pipefish population. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 34:435-442.