Point, counterpoint, and a statistical review on community living research

Mental Retardation

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 217-218

  Taylor, Steven J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFACT; MEDICAID; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MENTAL DEFICIENCY; PEER REVIEW; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESIDENTIAL CARE; RESIDENTIAL HOME; SHORT SURVEY; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

EID: 0031746080     PISSN: 00476765     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1352/0047-6765(1998)036<0217:tep>2.0.co;2     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Conroy, J. W. (1996). The small ICF/MR program: Dimensions of quality and cost. Mental Retardation, 34, 13-26.
2. Conroy, J. W. (1998). Response to Crinella, McCleary, and Swanson. Mental Retardation, 36, 225-226.
3. Conroy, J., Efthimiou, J., &. Lemanowicz, J. (1982). A matched comparison of the developmental growth of institutionalized and deinstitutionalized clients. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 581-587.
4. Crinella, F. M., McCleary, R., &. Swanson, J. M. (1998). How a regression artifact makes intermediate care facilities for the mentally retarded look ineffective. Mental Retardation, 36, 219-225.
5. Heifetz, L. J. (1998). Break the data-bank with Monte Carlo? Statistical problems in the debate between Conroy (1996) and Crinella, McCleary, and Swanson (1998). Mental Retardation, 36, 227-236.
6. Taylor, S. J. (in press). On the possibility of reaching a common ground: The continuum and current controversies. Journal on Developmental Disabilities.