Evaluation of the Brusini glaucoma staging system for typing and staging of perimetric results

Ophthalmologica

Volumn 212, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 221-227

  Koçak, Inci ^a   Zulauf, Mario ^a,b   Bergamin, Oliver ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY EYE CLINIC   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Aulhorn Karmeyer staging; Automated perimetry; Brusini glaucoma staging system; Glaucoma; Visual field

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MALE; PERIMETRY; STAGING; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

EID: 0031745323     PISSN: 00303755     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000027296     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aulhorn E, Karmeyer H: Frequency distribution in early glaucomatous visual field defects. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1977;14:75-83.
2. Lachenmayr BJ, Vivell PMO: Perimetrie. Stuttgart, Thieme, 1992, pp 61-65.
3. Weber J: Topographie der funktionellen Schädigung beim chronischen Glaukom. Heidelberg, Karden, 1991, pp 10-21.
4. Flammer J: The concept of visual-field indices. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1986;224: 389-392.
5. Gollamudi SR, Liao P, Hirsch J: Evaluation of corrected loss variance as a visual-field index. II. Corrected loss variance in conjunction with mean defect may identify stages of glaucoma. Ophthalmologica 1988;197:144-150.
6. Mandava S, Caprioli J, Zulauf M: Pattern index to quantify glaucomatous visual-field loss. J Glaucoma 1992;1:187-183.
7. Augustiny L, Flammer J: The influence of artificially induced visual-field defects on the visual-field indices. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1985;42:55-67.
8. Zulauf M, LeBlanc RP, Flammer J: Normal visual fields measured with Octopus-Program G1. II. Global visual field indices. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1989;227:513-517.
9. Bebie H: Computerized techniques of visual-field analysis; in Drance SM, Anderson D (eds): Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma: A Practical Guide. London, Grune & Stratton, 1985, pp 147-157.
10. Zulauf M, Mandava S, Caprioli J, Zeyen T: Sensitivity and sepcificity of visual-field indices; in Mills RP (ed): Perimetry Update 1992/93. Amsterdam, Kugler, 1993, pp 19-23.
11. Zulauf M, Caprioli J: Fluctuation of the visual field in glaucoma; in Caprioli J (ed): Contemporary Issues in Glaucoma. Ophthalmology Clinics of North America Series. WB. Sanders Co., Philadelphia, N. J., 1991, vol 4, pp 671-697.
12. Brusini P: Clinical use of a new method for visual-field damage classification in glaucoma: New method for visual-field damage classification in glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol, in press.
13. Brusini P: A comparison of three methods for distinguishing diffuse, localized, and mixed visual-field defects in glaucoma; in Wall M, Heijl A (eds): Perimetry Update 1996/97. Amsterdam, Kugler, 329-339.
14. Brusini P, Nicosia S, Weber J: Automated visual field management in glaucoma with the PeriData program; in Mills RP, Heijl A (eds): Perimetry Update 1990/91. New York, Kugler, 1991, pp 273-277.
15. Kaiser HJ, Flammer J, Messer C, Stümpfig D, Hendrickson Ph: Thirty-month visual-field follow-up of glaucoma patients treated with β-blockers. J Glaucoma 1992;1:153-155.
16. Messmer C, Flammer J, Stümpfig D: Influence of betaxolol and timolol on the visual fields of patients with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1991;112:678-681.
17. Flammer J, Bebie H, Jenni F, Keller B: The Octopus Glaucoma Program G1. Glaucoma 1987; 9:67-72.
18. Funkhouser AT, Fankhauser F, Weale RA: Problems related to diffuse versus localized loss in the perimetry of glaucomatous visual fields. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1992;230: 243-247.
19. Bebie H, Flammer J, Bebie Th: The cumulative defect curve: Separation of local and diffuse components of visual-field damage. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1989;227:9-12.
20. Anderson DR, Feuer WJ, Alward WLM, Skuta GL: Threshold equivalence between perimeters. Am J Ophthalmol 1989;107:493-505.
21. Johnson CA, Kellner JL, Lewis RA: Joint automated weighting statistic: A method of converting results between automated perimeters. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1987;49:563-568.
22. Vivell PMO, Lachenmayr BJ, Schaumberger MM, Zimmermann P, Dietrich J, Bain C: Conversion of normal visual field data between the Humphrey Field Analyzer 640, the Rodenstock Peristat 433, and the Octopus 1-2-3; in Mills RP (ed): Perimetry Update 1992/1993. Amsterdam, Kugler, 1993, pp 353-357.