Compared randomized roles and pain factor by Vabra land Wallach Endocell in endometrial evaluation

Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 258-261

  Lambert, Bernard ^a,b   Gonthier, Mariette ^a   Dery, Jean Paul ^a   Lepage, Yves ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b University of Montreal ^*  (Canada)

Author keywords

Endometrial sampling; Endometrium histopathology; Pain factor

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOMETRIOSIS; ENDOMETRIUM; ENDOMETRIUM CELL; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PARITY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; UTERUS BLEEDING;

ADULT; AGED; CURETTAGE; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; ENDOMETRIUM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PARITY; UTERINE DISEASES; UTERINE HEMORRHAGE; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 0031745235     PISSN: 03787346     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000009979     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Jensen JG: Vacuum curettage. Dan Med Bull 1970;17:199-202.
2. Cornier E: The Pipelle: A disposable device for endometrial biopsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;148:109-110.
3. Lipscomb GH, Lopatine SM, Stovall TG, Ling FW: A randomized comparison of the Pipelle, Accurette, and Explora endometrial sampling devices. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:591-594.
4. Guido RS, Kanbour-Sakir A, Rulin MC, Christopherson WA: Pipelle endometrial sampling. J Reprod Med 1995;40:553-555.
5. Stovall TG, Photopulos GJ, Poston WM, Ling FW, Sandles LG: Pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with known endometrial carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:954-956.
6. Hill GA, Herbert CM III, Parker RA, Wentz CA: Comparison of late luteal phase endometrial biopsies using the Novak curette or Pipelle endometrial suction curette. Obstet Gynecol 1989;73:443-445.
7. Stovall TG, Ling FW, Morgan PL: A prospective, randomized comparison of the Pipelle endometrial sampling device with the Novak curette. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:1287-1289.
8. Kaunitz AM, Masciello A, Ostrowski M, Rovira EZ: Comparison of endometrial biopsy with the endometrial Pipelle and Vabra aspirator. J Reprod Med 1988;33:427-430.
9. Rodriguez GC, Yaqub N, King ME: A comparison of the Pipelle device and the Vabra aspirator as measured by endometrial denudation in hysterectomy specimens: The Pipelle device samples significantly less of the endometrial surface than the Vabra aspirator. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:55-59.
10. Koonings PP, Moyer DL, Grimes DA: A randomized clinical trial comparing pipelle and Tis-u-trap for endometrial biopsy. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:293-295.