Economic and fragmentation effects of clearcut restrictions

Forest Science

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 569-577

  Barrett, T M ^a   Gilless, J K ^b   Davis, L S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adjacency constraints; Forest practice regulations; GIS; Landscape ecology

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031742605     PISSN: 0015749X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. AIGNER, M. 1987. Graph theory: A development from the 4-color problem. BCS Assoc., Moscow, ID. 226 p.
2. APPEL, K., AND W. HAKEN. 1989. Every planar map is four colorable. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI. 741 p.
3. BARRETT, T.M. 1996. A methodology for evaluation of the economic, forest fragmentation, and wildlife habitat effects of policies restricting size and adjacency of clearcut timber harvests. Ph.D. diss., U.C.-Berkeley. University Microfilms Intl., San Francisco, CA. 160 p.
4. BARRETT, T.M. 1997. Voronoi tessellation methods to delineate harvest units for spatial forest planning. Can. J. For. Res. 27:903-910.
5. BARRETT, T.M., L.S. DAVIS, AND F.G. SCHURR. 1994. Using tree growth and yield simulators to create ecological yield tables for silvicultural prescriptions. West. J. of Appl. For. 9(3):91-94.
6. BISWELL, H.H. 1989. Prescribed burning in California wildlands vegetation management. Univ. of Cal. Press, Berkeley, CA. 255 p.
7. BOOTH, D.L., D.W.K. BOULTER, D.J. NEAVE, A.A. ROTHERHAM, AND D.A. WELSH. 1993. Natural forest landscape management: a strategy for Canada. For. Chron. 69(2):141-145.
8. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION. 1994. California forest practice rules, Title 14, California Code of Regulations, June 1994 version, first printing. CDFFP, 1416 Ninth Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. 172 p.
9. DAVIS, L.S., AND R.H. BARRETT. 1992. Spatial integration of wildlife habitat analysis with long-term forest planning over multiple-owner landscapes. P. 143-154 in Proc. of a workshop on modeling sustainable forest ecosystems, LeMaster, D., and R. Sedjo (eds.). Forest Policy Center, American Forests, Washington, DC.
10. DAUST, D.K., AND J.D. NELSON. 1993. Spatial reduction factors for strata-based harvest schedules. For. Sci. 39(1):152-165.
11. ELLEFSON, P.V., A.S. CHENG, AND R.J. MOULTON. 1995. Regulation of private forestry practices by state governments. Minn. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 605-1996. Univ. of Minn., St. Paul, MN.
12. EU, M.F. 1990. Proposition 130: Text of proposed law. P. 94-101 in the California ballot pamphlet for the November 6, 1990 general election. Secretary of State, Sacramento, CA. 143 p.
13. FORESTRY INITIATIVES STUDY GROUP. 1990. New directions for private forests in California: A report to the California legislature on effects of implementing propositions 130 and 138. Available at: California State Library, Sacramento, CA.
14. FRANKLIN, J.F. 1993. Preserving biodiversity. Ecol. Applic. 3(2):202-205.
15. FRANKLIN, J.F., AND R.T. FORMAN. 1987. Creating landscape patterns by forest cutting: ecological consequences and principles. Landscape Ecol. 1:5-18.
16. GUSTAFSON, E.J., AND T.R. CROW. 1994. Modeling the effects of forest harvesting on landscape structure and the spatial distribution of cowbird parasitism. Landscape Ecol. 9(4):237-248.
17. HARRIS, L.D. 1984. The fragmented forest: Island biogeography theory and the preservation of biotic diversity. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. 211 p.
18. HUNTER, M.L. 1990. Wildlife, forests and forestry; principles of managing forests forbiological diversity. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 370 p.
19. HUNTER, M.L. 1997. The biological landscape. P. 57-67 in Creating a forestry for the 21st century, Kohm, K.A., and J.F. Franklin (eds.). Island Press, Washington, DC. 475 p.
20. MAINE FOREST SERVICE. 1993. Forest regeneration and clearcutting standards and summary. October 1990 with January 1991 revisions. For. Inf. Cent., SHS#22, Augusta, Maine 04333.
21. MAINE FOREST SERVICE. 1995. An evaluation of the effects of the forest practices act, submitted to the joint standing committee of the 117th legislature, agriculture, conservation and forestry. April 11, 1995. Maine For. Serv., State House Station 22, Augusta, Maine 04333. 30 p.
22. MAYER, K.E., AND W.F. LAUDENSLAYER JR. (EDS.). 1988. A guide to wildlife habitats of California. Cal. Dep. of Forestry and Fire Protection, Sacramento, CA 95 814. 166 p.
23. NELSON, J.D., AND D. ERRICO. 1993. Multiple-pass harvesting and spatial constraints: an old technique applied toa new problem. For. Sci. 39(1): 137-151.
24. NELSON, J.D., AND S.T. FINN. 1991. The influence of cut-block size and adjacency rules on harvest levels and road networks. Can. J. For. Res. 21:595-600.
25. O'HARA, A.J., B.H. FAALAND, AND B.B. BARE. 1989. Spatially constrained timber harvest scheduling. Can. J. For. Res. 19:715-724.
26. OLIVER, C.D. 1990. Forest stand dynamics. McGraw-Hill, New York. 467 p.
27. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY. June 1, 1993. Oregon forest practice rules and statutes. Oregon Dep. of For., 2600 State St., Salem, OR 97310. 29 p.
28. SNYDER, S., AND C. REVELLE. 1997. Dynamic selection of harvests with adjacency restrictions: The SHARe model. For. Sci. 43(2):213-222.
29. SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS. 1993. Task force report on sustaining long-term forest health and productivity. Soc. Am. For., 5400 Grosvenor Lane, Bethesda, MD 20814.
30. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. 1993. Forest health and clearcutting: hearings before the subcommittee on forests, family farms, and energy of the committee on agriculture. Serial 102-97. 699 p.
31. WEINTRAUB, A., M. GUIGNARD, AND R. EPSTEIN. 1994. Exact and approximate algorithms for forest management problems. P. 372-377 in Proc. of the 1994 symp. on Systems analysis in forest resources. Sessions, J., and J.D. Brodie (eds.). Oregon State University, Corvallis.
32. WILKINSON, C.F., AND H.M. ANDERSON. 1987. Land and resource planning in the national forests. Island Press, Covelo, CA. 396 p.
33. WOODCOCK, C.E., ET AL. 1990. Timber inventory using Landsat thematic mapper imagery and canopy reflectance models. P. 937-948 in 23rd internat, symp. on Remote sensing of environment. Environ. Res. Inst. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
34. WYKOFF, W.R., N.L. CROOKSTON, AND A.R. STAGE. 1982. User's guide to the stand prognosis model. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-133. 112 p.
35. YOSHIMOTO, A., AND J.D. BRODIE. 1994. Short-and long-term impacts of spatial restrictions on harvest scheduling with reference to riparian zone planning. Can. J. For. Res. 24:1617-1628.